Proximal femur geometry: a major predictor of proximal femur fracture subtypes

Abstract

Introduction:

Proximal femur geometry (PFG) represents an important risk factor for the occurrence of hip fractures. There are currently few studies regarding the correlation between PFG and the occurrence of a specific fracture subtype, and those that exist have small cohorts and present with different methodologies and contradictory results. Therefore, there is no consensus in the literature regarding this topic. The present study aimed to establish the contribution of the PFG in the occurrence of different subtypes of proximal femur fractures (PFF): intertrochanteric, neck and subtrochanteric.

Methods:

Analysis of 1022 plain anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of patients consecutively admitted to the emergency room of a Level 1 Trauma Centre between 2013 and 2019 after low energy trauma who presented with PFF and underwent surgical treatment. Patients were analysed considering age, gender and subtype of PFF (intertrochanteric, neck or subtrochanteric). Radiological parameters including cervicodiaphyseal angle (CDA), horizontal offset (HO), femoral neck width (FNW), femoral neck length (FNL), great trochanter-pubic symphysis distance (GTPSD), acetabular teardrop distance (ATD) and width of the intertrochanteric region (WIR) were measured and compared between the different subtypes of fractures (7154 measurements). Statistical analysis was conducted recurring to absolute measurements and measurements ratios. The correlation was assessed using t-test.

Results:

There were statistically significant differences in proximal femur geometry between the different subtypes of fractures. Patients presenting with femoral neck fractures had greater CDA (132.5 ± 6.9 vs. 130.0 ± 7.3; p < 0.001) and lower HO (45.8 ± 7.4 vs. 49.0 ± 8.0; p < 0.001), HO/ATD (0.34 ± 0.068 vs. 0.37 ± 0.072; p < 0.001) and HO/GTPSD (0.26 ± 0.049 vs. 0.28 ± 0.039; p < 0.001) than patients with intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric fractures.

Conclusions:

PFG represents an important contributor to the occurrence of different fracture subtypes. Femoral neck fractures are associated with greater CDA and lower HO, HO/ATD and HO/GTPSD when compared to intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures.

Keywords

Femoral neck fractures hip fractures hip geometry intertrochanteric fractures subtrochanteric fractures trochanteric fractures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Liu

Zhang

. Comparison of proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between femoral neck fractures and femoral intertrochanteric fractures in an elderly Chinese population. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018; 131: 2524–2530.

Ramponi

Kaufmann

Drahnak

. Hip fractures. Adv Emerg Nurs J 2018; 40: 8–15.

Sheehan

Shyu

Weaver

, et al. Proximal femoral fractures: what the orthopedic surgeon wants to know. Radiographics 2015; 35: 1563–1584.

Bouxsein

Zysset

Gluer

, et al. Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31: 393–408.

Diaz

Navas

. Risk factors for trochanteric and femoral neck fracture. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2018; 62: 134–141.

Panula

Savela

Jaatinen

, et al. The impact of proximal femur geometry on fracture type–a comparison between cervical and trochanteric fractures with two parameters. Scand J Surg 2008; 97: 266–271.

Lin

Cai

, et al. Influence of bone mineral density and hip geometry on the different types of hip fracture. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2016; 16: 35–38.

Lutnick

Kang

Freccero

. Surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures: a brief review. Geriatrics (Basel) 2020; 5: 22.

. Femoral neck fractures: a changing paradigm. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B: 43–47.

10.

Pires

Prata

Gibram

, et al. Radiographic anatomy of the proximal femur: correlation with the occurrence of fractures. Acta Ortop Bras 2012; 20: 79–83.

11.

Canto

RST

Silveira

Rosa

, et al. Morfologia radiográfica de quadril e pelve e sua relação com fraturas proximais do fêmur. Rev Bras Ortop 2003; 38: 12–20.

12.

Liu

, et al. Differences in bone mineral density and hip geometry in trochanteric and cervical hip fractures in elderly Chinese patients. Orthop Surg 2019; 11: 263–269.

13.

Patron

Duthie

Sutherland

. Proximal femoral geometry and hip fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 2006; 72: 51–54.

14.

Meinberg

Agel

Roberts

, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32(Suppl. 1): S1–S170.

15.

Glüer

Cummings

Pressman

, et al. Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 671–677.

16.

Alonso

Curiel

Carranza

, et al. Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11: 714–720.

17.

Gnudi

Ripamonti

Lisi

, et al. Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 69–73.

18.

Lecerf

Fessy

Philippot

, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95: 210–219.

19.

Kazemi

Qoreishy

Keipourfard

, et al. Effects of hip geometry on fracture patterns of proximal femur. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2016; 4: 248–252.

20.

Lee

Jung

Hong

, et al. Femoral geometry, bone mineral density, and the risk of hip fracture in premenopausal women: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17: 42.

21.

Lima

Miranda

Vasconcelos

. Radiographic anatomy of the proximal femur: femoral neck fracture vs. transtrochanteric fracture. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 52: 651–657.

22.

Michelotti

Clark

. Femoral neck length and hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1714–1720.

23.

Koo

. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155–163.