Levels of Anxiety and Pain during Chemotherapy with Peripheral versus Central Vascular Access: An Experimental Evaluation

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this research was to evaluate pain and anxiety levels in patients undergoing chemotherapy via central venous catheter (CVC) and peripheral venous access (PVA).

Method

The sample consisted of 56 cancer patients undergoing at least one chemotherapy treatment cycle. They were divided into two groups based on the administration method of the chemotherapeutic drug: the experimental group (patients with CVC) and the control group (patients with PVA). The instruments used were the following: for multidimensional pain evaluation the Italian Pain Questionnaire (QUID, devised by De Benedettis et al), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Chart of Pain. To evaluate the state and anxiety traits, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI questionnaire, by D. Spielberg) was used, and we used structured interviews for the statistical survey.

Results

Analyzing the data from the STAI questionnaire, it appeared that the state-trait anxiety levels of the experimental group and the control group were not significantly different (analysis of the mean difference made using the Student's t-test). The average scores of the STAI questionnaire for both groups fell within the normal range. This indicated that the anxiety level was unaffected by the introduction of the device (the CVC). The data collected with the QUID questionnaire and subsequent statistical analysis demonstrated that the difference between the means (Student's t-test) of the experimental group and the control group was significantly lower, as regards perception of the sensorial and evaluative quality of pain (p=0.05) in the experimental group. From the evaluation of the VAS method, it appeared that the difference between the means was not significant in either group, although the distribution of frequency tended towards lower values in the experimental group with respect to the control group. This confirms previous QUID research where a lower pain level is recorded.

Conclusions

Analysis of the data collected via the structured interview revealed that most of the CVC sample did not respond to catheter insertion as a sign of a worsening of their illness.

Keywords

Chemotherapy Anxiety Pain Central venous catheter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Biondi

, Costantini

, Grassi

. La mente e il cancro. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 1995; 20–31.

Teodori

. Trattato di medicina interna. Roma: Società Editrice Universo, 1993; 2773–807.

Bolacchi

M.G.

, Lera

. La malattia cronica e il suo effetto sulla psiche. In: Mengheri

, ed. E allora…il corpo recita i drammi della mente. Roma: Melusina Editrice 1985; 43–50.

Bonica

J.J.

. Cancer pain. In: Bonica

J.J.

ed. The management of pain, 2nd edn. Philadelphia/London: Lea and Febinger 1990; 400–60.

Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL).

Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 153–9.

Canestrari

. Nuovi metodi in psicometria. O.S. Firenze 1982; 7–23.

De Benedittis

, Corli

, Massei

, Nobili

, Pieri

. QUID. Questionario italiano del dolore. O.S. Firenze 1993; 8–19.

Fava

, Rafanelli

. Il processo diagnostico a partire dal dato quantitativo: il Symptom Questionnaire. In: Granieri

, ed. I test di personalità: quantità e qualità. Torino: UTET 1998; 52–66.

Dougherty

. Central venous access devices. The Royal Mardsen Hospital, London 2001.

10.

Romoli

, Bausi

. Il dolore e la sofferenza nella malattia neoplasica. Bologna: Edizioni La Mandragola, 1990; 32–47.

11.

Brown

D.F.

, Muirhead

M.J.

, Travis

P.M.

Mode of chemotherapy does not affect complications with an implantable venous access device.

Cancer 1997; 80: 966–72.

12.

Horattas

M.C.

, Trupiano

, Hopkins

Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.

Am J Infect Control 2001; 29: 32–40.

13.

Alexander

H.R.

. Vascular access in the cancer patients. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co, 1994; 11–25.

14.

Evans

. Vascular access device selection for parenteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Prat 1999; 14: 172–7.

15.

Turner

J.A.

, Romano

J.M.

. Psychological and psychosocial evaluation. In: Bonica

J.J.

ed. The management of pain, 2nd edn. Philadelphia/London: Lea and Febinger, 1990; 595–609.

16.

Bow

E.J.

, Kilpatrick

M.G.

, Clinch

J.J.

. Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: a randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact of quality of life. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1267.