A short bevel needle with a very thin tip improves vein puncture performance of peripheral intravenous catheters: An experimental study

Abstract

Background:

Peripheral intravenous catheter placement is frequently unsuccessful at the first attempt. One suggested risk factor is a small vein size, because of the consequences of mechanical forces generated by the needle tip. We developed short bevel needles with a very thin tip and evaluated their puncture performance in two in vitro models.

Methods:

Peripheral intravenous catheters with a new needle ground using the lancet method (experimental catheter (L)) or backcut method (experimental catheter (B)) were compared with a conventional peripheral intravenous catheter (Surshield Surflo®) in a penetration force test and a tube puncture test. Penetration forces were measured when peripheral intravenous catheters penetrated a polyethylene sheet. The tube puncture test was used to evaluate whether the peripheral intravenous catheters could puncture a polyvinyl chloride tube at two positions, at the center and at 0.5 mm from the center of the tube.

Results:

Mean penetration forces at the needle tip produced by experimental catheters (L) (0.05 N) and (B) (0.04 N) were significantly lower than those produced by the conventional catheter (0.09 N) (p < 0.01). At the catheter tip, mean forces produced by experimental catheter (B) and the conventional catheter were 0.16 N and 0.26 N, respectively (p < 0.05). In the tube puncture test, the frequency at which the conventional catheter punctured the center-shifted site on the tube at an angle of 20° and speed of 50 mm/min was low (40%). In contrast, experimental catheters (L) and (B) were 100% successful at puncturing both the center and center-shifted sites at 20°.

Conclusion:

Puncture performance was comparable between the lancet-ground and backcut-ground needles except for penetration forces at the catheter tip. The experimental catheters produced lower penetration forces and induced puncture without target displacement at smaller angles compared with the conventional catheter. Therefore, optimization of the needle can prevent vein deformation and movement, which may increase the first-attempt success rate.

Keywords

Backcut double-wall puncture first-attempt success rate lancet needle penetration force peripheral intravenous catheter short bevel small vein

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zingg

Pittet

. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 34(Suppl. 4): S38–S42.

Dychter

Gold

Carson

, et al. Intravenous therapy: a review of complications and economic considerations of peripheral access. J Infus Nurs 2012; 35(2): 84–91.

Keogh

. New research: change peripheral intravenous catheters as clinically indicated, not routinely. J Assoc Vasc Access 2013; 18: 153–154.

Idemoto

Rowbottom

Reynolds

, et al. The AccuCath intravenous catheter system with retractable coiled tip guidewire and conventional peripheral intravenous catheters: a prospective, randomized, controlled comparison. J Assoc Vasc Access 2014; 19: 94–102.

Riker

Kennedy

Winfrey

, et al. Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18(11): 1129–1134.

Sebbane

Claret

Lefebvre

, et al. Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. J Emerg Med 2013; 44(2): 299–305.

Aponte

Acosta

Rigamonti

, et al. The use of ultrasound for placement of intravenous catheters. AANA Journal 2007; 75: 212–216.

Balter

Chen

Maguire

, et al. The system design and evaluation of a 7-DOF image-guided venipuncture robot. IEEE Trans Robot 2015; 31(4): 1044–1053.

Kokotis

. Cost containment and infusion services. J Infus Nurs 2005; 28(3 Suppl.): S22–S32, quiz S33–S36.

10.

Panebianco

Fredette

Szyld

, et al. What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16(12): 1298–1303.

11.

Fields

Piela

, et al. Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 2014; 32(10): 1179–1182.

12.

Bensghir

Chkoura

Mounir

, et al. [Peripheral intravenous access in the operating room: characteristics and predictors of difficulty]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2012; 31(7–8): 600–604.

13.

Kuensting

DeBoer

Holleran

, et al. Difficult venous access in children: taking control. J Emerg Nurs 2009; 35(5): 419–424.

14.

Chen

Balter

Maguire

, et al. Real-time needle steering in response to rolling vein deformation by a 9-DOF image-guided autonomous venipuncture robot. Rep U S 2015; 2015: 2633–2638.

15.

Brannam

Blaivas

Lyon

, et al. Emergency nurses’ utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11(12): 1361–1363.

16.

Costantino

Parikh

Satz

, et al. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46(5): 456–461.

17.

Good

Rothman

Ackil

, et al. Hand motion analysis for assessment of nursing competence in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement. J Vasc Access 2019; 20(3): 301–306.

18.

Abolhassani

Patel

Moallem

. Needle insertion into soft tissue: a survey. Med Eng Phys 2007; 29(4): 413–431.

19.

Alterovitz

Goldberg

Pouliot

, et al. Sensorless motion planning for medical needle insertion in deformable tissues. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2009; 13(2): 217–225.

20.

Wang

Chen

Tai

, et al. Optimal needle design for minimal insertion force and bevel length. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36(9): 1093–1100.

21.

Suzuki

Tanaka

Fukuyama

, et al. Differences in penetration force of intravenous catheters: effect of grinding methods on inner needles of intravenous catheters. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2004; 29(4): 175–181.

22.

Cheng

Davies

Caldwell

, et al. A hand-held robotic device for peripheral intravenous catheterization. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2017; 231(12): 1165–1177.

23.

Oguzkurt

Tercan

Kara

, et al. US-guided placement of temporary internal jugular vein catheters: immediate technical success and complications in normal and high-risk patients. Eur J Radiol 2005; 55(1): 125–129.

24.

Gordon

Saliken

Johns

, et al. US-guided puncture of the internal jugular vein: complications and anatomic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9(2): 333–338.

25.

Fukutome

Jimi

Uehara

, et al. [Pathway of the radial artery located with a small-caliber Doppler probe for arterial cannulation in pediatric patients]. Masui: Japan J Anesth 1995; 44(3): 414–418.

26.

Okamoto

Ami

Oshima

. Assessment of needle insertion pain with flexor reflex responses in anesthetized rats. Pain Res 2012; 27: 215–225.

27.

Legoff

Dauphin

Pourriat

, et al. [Comparison of the penetration of various short venous catheters]. Ann Anesthesiol Fr 1978; 19(9): 783–789.