Tapered and non-tapered prosthetic grafts in upper extremity dialysis access: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective:

It is unclear whether tapered arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are superior to non-tapered AVGs when it comes to preventing upper extremity ischemic steal syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of tapered and non-tapered AVGs using systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods:

A literature search was systemically performed to identify all English publications from 1999 to 2019 that directly compared the outcomes of upper extremity tapered and non-tapered AVGs. Outcomes evaluated were the primary patency at 1-year (number of studies (n) = 4), secondary patency at 1-year (n = 3), and risk of ischemic steal (n = 5) and infection (n = 4). Effect sizes of individual studies were pooled using random-effects model, and between-study variability was assessed using the I² statistic.

Results:

Of 5808 studies screened, five studies involving 4397 patients have met the inclusion criteria and included in the analysis. Meta-analyses revealed no significant difference for the risk of ischemic steal syndrome (pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% Confidence Incidence (CI) 0.29–2.91, p = 0.89, I² = 48%) between the tapered and non-tapered upper extremity AVG. The primary patency (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.93–1.90, p = 0.12, I² = 10%) and secondary patency at 1-year (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.84–2.63, p = 0.17, I² = 13%), and rate of infection (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.30–1.27, p = 0.19, I² = 29%) were also similar between the tapered and non-tapered AVG.

Conclusions:

The risk of ischemic steal syndrome and patency rate are comparable for upper extremity tapered and non-tapered AVGs. This meta-analysis does not support the routine use of tapered graft over non-tapered graft to prevent ischemic steal syndrome in upper extremity dialysis access. However, due to small number of studies and sample sizes as well as limited stratification of outcomes based on risk factors, future studies should take such limitations into account while designing more robust protocols to elucidate this issue.

Keywords

Tapered graft non-tapered graft prosthetic grafts dialysis access upper extremity dialysis access end stage renal disease arteriovenous graft

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

United States Renal Data System. 2018 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2018.

Ravani

Palmer

Oliver

, et al. Associations between hemodialysis access type and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 24(3): 465–473.

Akoh

Prosthetic arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis. J Vasc Access 2009; 10: 137–147.

Lok

Fistula first initiative: advantages and pitfalls. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 1043–1053.

Sgroi

Patel

Wilson

, et al. The optimal initial choice for permanent arteriovenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58: 539–548.

Farber

Imrey

Huber

, et al. Multiple preoperative and intraoperative factors predict early fistula thrombosis in the hemodialysis fistula maturation study. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63: 163–170.

Lok

Huber

Lee

, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75: S1–S164.

Tynan-Cuisinier

Berman

SS.

Strategies for predicting and treating access induced ischemic steal syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 32: 309–315.

Krueger

Huhle

Krys

, et al. Effect of tapered grafts on hemodynamics and flow rate in dialysis access grafts. Artif Organs 2004; 28: 623–628.

10.

Sarmast

Niroomand-Oscuii

Ghalichi

, et al. Evaluation of the hemodynamics in straight 6-mm and tapered 6- to 8-mm grafts as upper arm hemodialysis vascular access. Med Biol Eng Comput 2014; 52: 797–811.

11.

Sarmast

Oscuii

Ghalichi

, et al. A comparative study of the hemodynamics in two types of grafts of 6 mm versus 6-8 mm as an upper arm straight graft hemodialysis access. In: IFMBE Proceedings, 6th world congress of biomechanics, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1–6 August 2010, pp.382–385.

12.

Roberts

Farber

Jones

, et al. Tapered arteriovenous grafts do not provide significant advantage over nontapered grafts in upper extremity dialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69: 1552–1558.

13.

Higgins

Thomas

Chandler

, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.0, www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (2019, accessed 1 March 2020).

14.

Liberati

Altman

Tetzlaff

, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. Epub ahead of print July 2009. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.

15.

EndNote. Clarivate analytics, 2018 (accessed 1 March 2020).

16.

Luchini

Stubbs

Solmi

, et al. Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. World J Metaanal 2017; 5: 80–84.

17.

Wells

. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses, http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed 1 March 2020)

18.

Higgins

Thompson

Deeks

, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J 2003; 327: 557–560.

19.

Mohan

Adler

DG.

Heterogeneity in systematic review and meta-analysis: how to read between the numbers. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 902–903.

20.

Borenstein

Hedges

Higgins

, et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis. Englewood, NJ: Biostat, 2013.

21.

Polo

Ligero

Diaz-Cartelle

, et al. Randomized comparison of 6-mm straight grafts versus 6- to 8-mm tapered grafts for brachial-axillary dialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 319–324.

22.

García-Pajares

Polo

Flores

, et al. Upper arm polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for dialysis access. Analysis of two different graft sizes: 6 mm and 6-8 mm. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 37: 335–343.

23.

Han

Seo

Ryu

JW.

Surgical outcomes of forearm loop arteriovenous fistula formation using tapered versus non-tapered polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 50: 30–35.

24.

Dammers

Planken

Pouls

, et al. Evaluation of 4-mm to 7-mm versus 6-mm prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop access for hemodialysis: results of a randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 143–148.

25.

Malik

Tuka

Kasalova

, et al. Understanding the dialysis access steal syndrome. A review of the etiologies, diagnosis, prevention and treatment strategies. J Vasc Access 2008; 9: 155–166.

26.

Lemson

Tordoir

Daemen

, et al. Intimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19: 336–350.

27.

Prischl

Kirchgatterer

Brandstätter

, et al. Parameters of prognostic relevance to the patency of vascular access in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 1613–1618.

28.

Valerianova

Kudlicka

Chytilova

, et al. Factors influencing dialysis arteriovenous graft survival. J Vasc Access 2017; 18: 139–143.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.53 MB