Abstract
Background:
Dysfunctional distal arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) with small caliber distal inflow arteries theoretically require percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) throughout the entire arterial length. However, in clinical practice, whole distal inflow arterial PTA is not frequently performed due to concerns about possible arterial rupture. Therefore, we investigated the safety and efficacy of this procedure at our center, comparing it with the standard venous PTA.
Methods:
From March 2017 to December 2022, 48 cases of distal AVF salvaged by whole distal inflow arterial PTA were assigned into a treatment group and 121 cases of distal AVF salvaged by venous standard PTA not involving the whole inflow artery were assigned into a control group. These two groups were then compared.
Results:
Those in the treatment group (who received whole distal inflow arterial PTA) were older than those in the control group (mean age, 69 vs 59 years, p < 0.001). Otherwise, differences between the two groups were unremarkable. After the salvage treatment, primary patency seemed to decrease in the treatment group with whole distal inflow arterial PTA compared to the control group with conventional PTA, although such decrease was not significant (p = 0.072). However, primary assisted patency and secondary patency were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.350 and p = 0.590, respectively). And in the treatment group, only one arterial dissection occurred, which was successfully managed with balloon tamponade so that no distal AVF was abandoned due to complications following whole distal inflow arterial PTA.
Conclusion:
Whole distal inflow arterial PTA is an effective and safe option for distal AVF salvage with a narrowed inflow artery, frequently refractory to conventional venous PTA.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.