This article discusses the relationship between technology and Inuit identity. Using interviews, it explores how a group of students from the Arctic College located in the community of Iqaluit in the Canadian Arctic, use the social network Facebook. It was found that in addition to an expected use of the social network associated with the script promoted by the technology, Inuit youth used Facebook to access content related to their identity in various groups, discuss sociocultural issues, and remember traditions. This article argues that Inuit identity is an example of how indigenous cultures have to be understood as something dynamic, constantly changing, for which information and communication technologies are fundamental. Furthermore, this article claims that rather than understanding Facebook as a tool that is adopted by Indigenous people—as previous literature tends to hold—the use of digital media should be conceived as part and parcel of identity.
AarsæherN.BaerenholdtJ. O. (2001). The reflexive north. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers.
2.
AarsæherN.RiabovaL.BærenholdtJ. (2004). Community viability. In NilssonA.LarsenJ. N.EinarssonN. (Eds.), Arctic human development report (pp. 139–154). Akureyri, Iceland: Stefansson Arctic Institute.
3.
AkrichM. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In BijkerW. E.LawJ. (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
BotangenK. A.VodanovichS.YuJ. (2017, January4–7). Preservation of indigenous culture among indigenous migrants through social media: The igorot peoples. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI.
6.
BreyP. (2017). The strategic role of technology in a good society. Technology in Society, 52, 39–45
7.
CallonM.LawJ. (1997). After the individual in society: Lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 22, 165–182.
8.
CarlsonB. (2013). The ‘new frontier’: Emergent Indigenous identities and social media. In HarrisM.NakataM.CarlsonB. (Eds.), The politics of identity: Emerging indigeneity (pp. 147–168). Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: University of Technology Sydney E-Press.
CarlsonB.FarrellyT.FrazerR.BorthwickF. (2015). Mediating tragedy: Facebook, Aboriginal peoples and suicide. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 19, 1–15.
11.
CarlsonB.FrazerR. (2015). “It’s like going to a cemetery and lighting a candle”: Aboriginal Australians, Sorry Business and social media. Alternative, 11, 2410.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
15.
ChristensenN. B. (2003). Inuit in cyberspace. Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen; Tusculanum Press.
16.
ChristensenN. B. (2006). A screen of snow and recognition reigned supreme? Journeys into the homeland of a Greenlandic webpage. In LandzeliusK. (Ed.), Native on the net: Indigenous and diasporic peoples in the virtual age (pp. 80–96). New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
CsonkaY.SchweitzerP. (2004). Societies and cultures: Change and persistence. In NilssonA.LarsenJ. N.EinarssonN. (Eds.), Arctic human development report (pp. 45–68). Akureyri, Iceland: Stefansson Arctic Institute.
18.
DahlJ. (2000). Saqqaq: An Inuit hunting community in the modern world. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
19.
DamasD. (2002). Arctic villagers: The transformation of Inuit settlement in the Central Arctic. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
20.
DicksD. (1977). From dog sled to dial phone: A cultural gap?Journal of Communications, 27, 120–129.
21.
DoraisL. J. (1997). Quaqtaq: Modernity and identity in an Inuit community. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
22.
DoraisL. J. (2010). Taitsumaninitaanit Siarumut: Language, community, identity, and the young Inuit in Quaqtaq. Québec City, Québec, Canada: Centre Interuniversitaire D’etudes Et De Recherches Autochtones (CIÉRA), Faculte De Sciences Sociales, Université Laval.
23.
DuarteM. E. (2015). Knowledge, technology, and self-determination. In WoonsM. (Ed.), Restoring indigenous self-determination: Theoretical and practical approaches (pp. 52–63). Bristol, UK: E-International Relations.
24.
DuarteM. E. (2017). Connected activism: Indigenous uses of social media for shaping political change. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21. Retrieved from http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1525/769 (accessed 25 May 2018).
GraburnN. (2006). Culture as narrative. In SternP.StevensonL. (Eds.), Critical Inuit studies: An anthology of contemporary Arctic Ethnography (pp. 139–155). Lincoln, OR; London, England: University of Nebraska Press.
27.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
28.
HIcksJ.WhiteG. (2000). Nunavut: Inuit self-determination through a land claim and public government? In DahlJ.HicksJ.JullP. (Eds.), Nunavut: Inuit regain control of their lands and their lives (No. 102). Copenhagen: IWGIA.
29.
HudsonH. E. (1977). The role of radio in the Canadian north. Journal of Communication, 27(4), 130–139.
30.
HutchbyI. (2001).Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35, 441–456.
31.
JonesA.JenkinsK. (2008). Rethinking collaboration: Working the indigene-colonizer hyphen. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 471–486). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
KempW. (1971). The flow of energy in a hunting society. Scientific American, 224, 105–115.
KroneO. (2007, April16–18). ICT in the Arctic -two elements for consideration. Paper presented at Knowledge and Power in the Arctic Conference, Rovaniemi, Finland.
35.
KroneO. (2008, September24–27). The Arctic and challenges of the exterior-Knowledge, ICT, and Autonomy. Paper presented at 5th NRF Open Assembly, Anchorage, Alaska.
36.
LandzeliusK. (2006). Introduction: Native on the net. In LandzeliusK. (Ed.), Native on the net: Indigenous and diasporic peoples in the virtual age (pp. 1–42). London, England: Routledge.
LatourB. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
LatourB. (1994). On technical mediation—Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3, 29–64.
40.
LumbyB. (2010). Cyber-indigeneity: Urban indigenous identity on Facebook. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 39, 68–75.
41.
McMahonR. (2013). Digital self-determination: Aboriginal peoples and the network society in Canada (Unpublished PhD thesis). Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
42.
MolyneauxH.O’DonnellS.KakekaspanC.WalmarkB.BudkaP.GibsonK. (2012, September24–28). Community resilience and social media: Remote and rural First Nations communities, social isolation and cultural preservation. Paper presented at 2012 International Rural Network Forum, Whyalla, South Australia, Australia.
43.
NiezenR. (2009). The rediscovered self: Indigenous identity and cultural justice. Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Kingston, Ontario, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
44.
OudshoornN.PinchT. (2003). Introduction: How users and non-users matters. In OudshoornN.PinchT. (Eds.), How users matters: The co-construction of users and technology (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
PetrayT. L. (2011). Protest 2.0: Online interactions and Aboriginal activists. Media, Culture & Society, 33, 923–994.
46.
RiceE. S.HaynesE.RoyceP.ThompsonS. C. (2016). Social media and digital technology use among Indigenous young people in Australia: A literature review. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15, 81.
47.
RogersS.DeGagnéM.DewarJ.LowryG. (2012). “Speaking my truth”: Reflections on reconciliation & residential school. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Aboriginal Healing Foundation.
48.
RoveriF. (2017). Argentina: Derechos de las culturas indígenas e internet. In BurchS. (ed.) América Latina en Movimiento: Internet y derechos económicos, sociales y culturales (pp. 30–32). Quito, Ecuador: ALAI and Asociación para el Progreso de las Comuncaciones.
49.
SavardJ. A. (1998). Theoretical debate on the social and political implications of Internet implementation for the Inuit of Nunavut. Wicazosa Review, 13, 83–97.
50.
ScobieW.WachowichN. (2010). Uploading selves: Inuit digital storytelling on YouTube. Études/Inuit/Studies, 34, 81–105.
51.
SouthcottC. (2005). Globalization, culture, and northern identities: Some considerations for a northern dimension foreign policy. Polar Geography, 292, 103–118.
ValaskakisG. G. (1982). Communication and Control in the Canadian North—the Potential of Interactive Satellites. Études/Inuit/Studies, 6, 19–28.
54.
VirtanenP. K. (2015). Indigenous social media practices in Southwestern Amazonia. Alternative, 11, 350–362.
55.
WachowichN.ScobieW. (2010). Uploading selves: Inuit digital storytelling on YouTube. Études/Inuit/Studies, 34(2), 81–105.
56.
WajcmanJ. (2015). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
WenzelG. W. (1991). Animal rights, human rights: Ecology, economy and ideology in the Canadian Arctic. London, England: Belhaven Press.
58.
WenzelG. W. (2009). Canadian Inuit subsistence and ecological instability—If the climate changes, must the Inuit?Polar Research, 28, 89–99.
59.
WhitridgeP. (2004). Whales, harpoons, and other actors Actor-network theory and hunter-gatherer archaeology. In CrothersG. M. (Ed.), Hunters and gatherers in theory and archaeology (pp. 445–474, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 31). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.
60.
WoolgarS. (2002). Introduction: Five rules of virtuality. In WoolgrS. (Ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
