Between Forests and Carbon Trading: AMAN’s Efforts in Advancing Indigenous Rights in Indonesia

Abstract

This article explores how the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN), Indonesia’s most influential Indigenous organization, mobilized advocacy strategies to challenge Indonesia’s forest carbon trade policy and advance Indigenous rights. Using the lens of policy entrepreneurship, it examines how AMAN employed strategies such as producing legal and spatial evidence, pursuing judicial review, engaging legislators, and leveraging electoral strategies to revoke the forest carbon trade policy and push for the long-delayed Indigenous Peoples Rights Bill as a safeguard. Based on semi-structured interviews and document analysis, the study finds that its efforts were constrained nationally by an oligarchic parliament, a different development mindset of the executive branch, and a closed judicial system in the Supreme Court. These barriers not only limited AMAN’s influence but also exposed structural challenges facing an Indigenous organization in climate policy. The findings underscore that supportive policy venues and networks are essential for transformative advocacy.

Keywords

AMAN carbon trade forestry sector Indigenous peoples policy entrepreneur

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acciaioli

(2001). Grounds of conflict, idioms of harmony: Custom, religion, and nationalism in violence avoidance at the Lindu Plain, Central Sulawesi. Indonesia, 72, 81. https://doi.org/10.2307/3351482

Aditya

Z. F.

Winata

M. R.

(2018). Rekonstruksi Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia [reconstruction of the hierarchy of legislation in Indonesia]. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v9i1.976

Aldy

J. E.

Stavins

R. N.

(2012). The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(2), 152–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442508

AMAN. (2022). Anggaran Rumah Tangga Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara 2022-2027 [Bylaws of the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN) 2022–2027]. https://aman.or.id/files/organization-document/25958ANGGARAN%20RUMAH%20TANGGA%20AMAN_FINAL.pdf

AMAN, WALHI, Yayasan Pikul, Yayasan Pusaka, JATAM, Greenpeace Indonesia, & Sekolah Ekonomi Demokratik (SED). (2023). Surat bersama masyarakat sipil terkait perdagangan karbon: Boikot perdagangan karbon, hentikan pelepasan dan pembongkaran emisi, dan percepat pengakuan wilayah adat serta wilayah kelola adat [Civil society joint letter on carbon trading: Boycott carbon trading, stop emission releases, and accelerate indigenous and local community areas]. https://www.walhi.or.id/uploads/buku/surat_terbuka_perdagangan_karbon_2023.pdf

AMAN. (2023). Perspektif Ekonomi Politik Perdagangan Karbon dan Dampaknya Bagi Masyarakat Adat [Political Economy Perspectives on Carbon Trading and Its Impact on Indigenous Communities]. https://aman.or.id/files/publication-documentation/46147Kertas_Posisi_Perdagangan_Karbon_2023%20-%20fin.pdf

AMAN. (2024). Catatan Akhir Tahun 2023: Masyarakat Adat di Tahun Politik [End-of-year notes 2023: Indigenous peoples in a political year]. https://aman.or.id/publication-documentation/catatan-tahun-2023-aliansi-masyarakat-adat-nusantara-(aman)

Arandito

(2024, March 18). Caleg Masyarakat Adat Gagal ke Senayan, tapi Tidak Kalah [Indigenous peoples’ legislative candidates failed to reach parliament, but did not lose]. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/caleg-masyarakat-adat-gagal-ke-senayan-tapi-tidak-kalah?status=sukses_login&utm_source=kompasid&utm_medium=login_paywall&utm_campaign=login&utm_content=https://www.kompas.id/artikel/caleg-masyarakat-adat-gagal-ke-senayan-tapi-tidak-kalah&loc=header

Arizona

(2022). Rethinking Adat strategies: The politics of state recognition of customary land rights in Indonesia. Leiden University. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/3309795

10.

Asian Development Bank. (2021). Article 6 of the Paris agreement: Drawing lessons from the joint crediting mechanism-Version II. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS210420-2

11.

Asrinaldi, Yusoff

M. A.

Karim

D. Z. A

. (2022). Oligarchy in the Jokowi government and its influence on the implementation of legislative function in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891121995564

12.

Astuti

McGregor

(2017). Indigenous land claims or green grabs? Inclusions and exclusions within forest carbon politics in Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(2), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1197908

13.

Badan Registrasi Wilayah Adat. (2024). Status Pengakuan Wilayah Adat di Indonesia, Edisi Agustus 2024 [Status of recognition of Indigenous territories in Indonesia, August 2024 Edition]. https://brwa.or.id/assets/image/rujukan/1723272701.pdf

14.

Brouwer

Huitema

Biermann

(2009, December 2–4). Towards adaptive management: The strategies of policy entrepreneurs to direct policy change [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2009 Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, vol. 2. https://edepot.wur.nl/233768

15.

Butt

Parsons

(2014). Judicial review and the supreme court in Indonesia: A new space for law? Indonesia, 97, 55–85. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.97.0055

16.

Cairney

Zahariadis

(2016). Multiple streams approach: A flexible metaphor presents an opportunity to operationalize agenda setting processes. In Zahariadis

(Ed.), Handbook of public policy agenda setting. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715922.00014

17.

Carmona

(2024). Climate change governance and Indigenous Peoples participation: An analysis from the Chilean case. Environmental Politics, 33(1), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2180911

18.

Cetera

(2022). Recognition of forest carbon rights in Indonesia: A constitutional approach. Lentera Hukum, 9(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v9i1.29331

19.

Cohen

(2016). Policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting. In Zahariadis

(Ed.), Handbook of public policy agenda setting. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715922.00019

20.

Cohen

Naor

(2017). Entrepreneurial failure in the transition to electric vehicles: A case study of support for sustainability policy in Israel. Policy and Society, 36(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1369678

21.

Darmawan

A. B.

Virgy

M. A.

(2023). Urgensi Pengesahan RUU MHA melalui Kerangka Indigenous Environmental Justice: Studi Kasus Pembangunan Pabrik Semen di Kendeng [The urgency of enacting the Indigenous Peoples bill through an Indigenous environmental justice framework: A case study of the Kendeng Cement Factory Development]. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 10(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v10i2.82649

22.

Darwin Holmes

A. G

. (2020). Researcher positionality—A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research—A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232

23.

Durmaz

Schroeder

(2025). Indigenous contestations of carbon markets, carbon colonialism, and power dynamics in international climate negotiations. Climate, 13(8), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13080158

24.

Ezroj

(2020). Carbon risk and green finance (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095996

25.

Fahmi

Stoll

P.-T.

Shabarullah

Rahman

Syukri

(2024). The state’s business upon Indigenous land in Indonesia: A legacy from Dutch colonial regime to modern Indonesian state. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(3), 1566. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i3.19992

26.

Fay

Denduangrudee

H.-M. S.

(2016). Emerging options for the recognition and protection of indigenous community rights in Indonesia. In McCarthy

J. F.

Robinson

(Eds.), Land and Development in Indonesia (pp. 91–112). ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814762106-009

27.

Frisch Aviram

Cohen

Beeri

. (2020). Wind(ow) of change: A systematic review of policy entrepreneurship characteristics and strategies. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 612–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12339

28.

Gilbert

Begbie-Clench

(2018). “Mapping for rights”: Indigenous peoples, litigation and legal empowerment. Erasmus Law Review, 11(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000092

29.

Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Presidential Regulation No. 98 of 2021 on the implementation of carbon economic value for achieving the nationally determined contribution targets and controlling greenhouse gas emissions in national development. https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/dok/perpres-98-tahun-2021/overview

30.

Guglyuvatyy

(2024). Indigenous engagement challenges and carbon mitigation activities in Malaysian forest policy. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 7, Article 1362330. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1362330

31.

Haar

R. N.

Krebs

L. F.

(2021). The Failure of foreign policy entrepreneurs in the Trump administration. Politics & Policy, 49(2), 446–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12399

32.

Hennink

M. M.

Hutter

Bailey

(2020). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

33.

Hidayah

N. P.

(2013). Pemberdayaan Kelompok Masyarakat Desa Kalumpang Kedamangan mantangai dalam Mendukung Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation Plus (REDD+) [Empowerment of the Kalumpang village community group, Mantangai Kedamangan, in supporting reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation plus (REDD+)]. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/63499

34.

Hidayat

A. S.

(2019). Penerapan Asas Audi Alteram Et Partem Pada Perkara Judicial review Di Mahkamah Agung [The application of the Audi Alteram Et Partem Principle in judicial review cases at the supreme court]. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 3(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v3i1.408

35.

Indonesian Parliamentary Center, P. (2022). INDEKS KINERJA LEGISLASI DPR RI TAHUN 2020-2021 [Legislative performance index of the Indonesian house of representatives (DPR RI), 2020–2021]. Indonesian Parliamentary Center. https://openparliament.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/IKL-DPR-RI-TS-2020-2021_Final.pdf

36.

Karunia

A. M.

Djumena

(2020, September 10). Kenapa Omnibus Law UU Cipta Kerja Terburu-buru Disahkan? Ini Menurut Pengamat [Why was the omnibus law on job creation rushed into passage? Here’s what analysts say]. https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/10/09/163900926/kenapa-omnibus-law-uu-cipta-kerja-terburu-buru-disahkan-ini-menurut-pengamat?page=all

37.

Khanal

Zhang

(2025). Forest carbon markets: A review. International Forestry Review, 27(3), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554825840319618

38.

Kingdon

J. W.

(1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4(4), 621. https://doi.org/10.2307/3323801

39.

Lakhani

(2021, November 3). A continuation of colonialism’: Indigenous activists say their voices are missing at COP26. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/02/cop26-indigenous-activists-climate-crisis

40.

Lala

(2023, August 11). Walhi: Perdagangan Karbon Berdampak Penggusuran Masyarakat [WALHI: Carbon trading leads to the displacement of communities]. https://betahita.id/news/detail/9105/walhi-perdagangan-karbon-berdampak-penggusuran-masyarakat.html?v=1701962668

41.

T. M.

(2001). Masyarakat adat, difference, and the limits of recognition in Indonesia’s forest zone. Modern Asian Studies, 35(3), 645–676.

42.

Maguire

Delahunt

(2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3). https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335/553

43.

Malau

(2021). Nasib RUU Masyarakat Adat Masih Menggantung di DPR [The fate of the Indigenous peoples bill remains uncertain in the house of representatives]. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2021/05/06/nasib-ruu-masyarakat-adat-masih-menggantung-di-dpr

44.

Margiansyah

Aidulsyah

Kurniawan

F. E.

Kusumaningrum

Aini

Sabilla

(2020). PETA PEBISNIS DI PARLEMEN POTRET OLIGARKI DI INDONESIA [A map of business actors in parliament: A portrait of oligarchy in Indonesia]. Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31169.17765

45.

Media Indonesia. (2022, October 30). Sekjen AMAN: RUU Masyarakat Adat belum disahkan DPR RI karena ditolak Fraksi PDIP dan Golkar [AMAN secretary general: The Indigenous peoples bill has not been passed by the DPR RI due to rejection by the PDIP and Golkar Factions]. https://mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/533660/sekjen-aman-ruu-masyarakat-adat-belum-disahkan-dpr-ri-karena-ditolak-fraksi-pdip-dan-golkar

46.

Meijerink

Huitema

(2010). Policy entrepreneurs and change strategies: Lessons from sixteen case studies of water transitions around the globe. Ecology and Society, 15(2), art21. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03509-150221

47.

Mercer

(2007). The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980601094651

48.

Miles

W. B.

(2021). The invisible commodity: Local experiences with forest carbon offsetting in Indonesia. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(2), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620905235

49.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 7 of 2023 on Procedures for Carbon Trading in the Forestry Sector [Permen LHK No. 7/2023]. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/254282/permen-lhk-no-7-tahun-2023

50.

Mintrom

(2015). Policy entrepreneurs and morality politics: Learning from failure and success. In Aflaki

I. N.

Miles

Petridou

(Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the Polis: Understanding political entrepreneurship (pp. 103–117). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315579931

51.

Mintrom

(2019). So you want to be a policy entrepreneur? Policy Design and Practice, 2(4), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1675989

52.

Mintrom

Salisbury

Luetjens

(2014). Policy entrepreneurs and promotion of Australian state knowledge economies. Australian Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2014.934657

53.

Pham

T. T.

Kengoum

Moeliono

Dwisatrio

(2021). Forest governance in DRC: An analysis from actors’ participation in REDD+ policy development. International Forestry Review, 23(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554821832140394

54.

Prihatiningtyas

Wijoyo

Wahyuni

Fitriana

Z. M.

(2023). PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN DALAM KEBIJAKAN PERDAGANGAN KARBON (CARBON TRADING) DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI UPAYA MENGATASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM [A Justice perspective in Indonesia’s carbon trading policy as an effort to address climate change]. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2023.v7.i2

55.

PPMAN. (2022). Analisa yuridis putusan 61 P/HUM/2022 tentang hak uji materiil terhadap Peraturan Presiden Nomor 98 Tahun 2021 tentang penyelenggaraan nilai ekonomi karbon untuk pencapaian target kontribusi yang ditetapkan secara nasional dan pengendalian emisi gas rumah kaca dalam pembangunan nasional [Juridical analysis of decision 61 P/HUM/2022 on judicial review of Presidential Regulation Number 98 of 2021 concerning the implementation of carbon economic value for achieving nationally determined contribution targets and greenhouse gas emission control in national development].

56.

Putra

D. S.

(2022). KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM JUDICIAL REVIEW TERHADAP PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI BAWAH UNDANG-UNDANG [The authority of the supreme court in conducting judicial review of regulations below the level of laws]. Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law, 2, 53–63.

57.

Redvers

Chan

Odochao

Pratt

Sim

Gougsa

Kobei

D. M.

Willetts

(2025). Carbon markets: A new form of colonialism for Indigenous Peoples? The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(5), e421–e430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00086-5

58.

Safitri

M. A.

(2015). Dividing the land: Legal gaps in the recognition of customary land in Indonesian forest areas. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 30(2), 31–48.

59.

Safitri

M. A.

Uliyah

(2014). Adat di tangan pemerintah daerah: Panduan penyusunan produk hukum daerah untuk pengakuan dan perlindungan hak masyarakat hukum adat [Customary law in the hands of local governments: A guide to drafting local legal instruments for the recognition and protection of Indigenous peoples’ rights] (Cetakan pertama). Epistema Institute.

60.

Safuta

(2021). When policy entrepreneurs fail: Explaining the failure of long-term care reforms in Poland. Social Policy & Administration, 55(6), 1098–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12714

61.

Sari

D. A. A.

Mayastuti

Rianto

Lutfiyah

(2018). Indigenous people’s forest management to support REDD program and Indonesia one map policy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 200, 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/200/1/012048

62.

Scott

J. C.

(2020). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed (Veritas paperback ed.). Yale University Press.

63.

Sherlock

(2012). Made by committee and consensus: Parties and policy in the Indonesian parliament. South East Asia Research, 20(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2012.0121

64.

Sherpa

P. D.

Sherpa

Rai

Sherpa

P. T.

(2018). Nepal: Customary resource management a foundation for REDD+. Tebtebba Foundation. https://www.tebtebba.org/index.php/resources-menu/publications-menu/books/61-customary-tenure-systems-and-redd-ensuring-benefits-for-indigenous-peoples/file

65.

Shiva

(2014). Homeless in the ‘global village’. In Mies

Vandana

(Eds.), Ecofeminism (pp. 98–107). Zed Books.

66.

Siscawati

Banjade

M. R.

Liswanti

Herawati

Esther

Wulandari

Tjoa

Silaya

(2017). Overview of forest tenure reforms in Indonesia. Center for International Forestry Research. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006402

67.

Slater

(2020). Indonesia’s tenuous democratic success and survival. In Power

Warburton

(Eds.), The democracy in Indonesia: From stagnation to regression (pp. 45–62). ISEAS Publishing. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/democracy-in-indonesia/indonesias-tenuous-democratic-success-and-survival/5F2B31FC9341BFAB379112060B6DA863

68.

Statistics Indonesia. (2023). Ini Luas Tutupan Hutan Indonesia, dari Sumatra sampai Papua [This is the extent of Indonesia’s forest cover, from Sumatra to Papua]. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/infografik/2023/01/16/ini-luas-tutupan-hutan-indonesia-dari-sumatra-sampai-papua#:~:text=Berdasarkan%20laporan%20Badan%20Pusat%20Statistik,mencapai%20191%2C69%20juta%20ha

69.

Subono

N. I.

(2017). Dari adat ke politik: Transformasi gerakan sosial di Amerika Latin [From customary communities to politics: The transformation of social movements in Latin America]. Marjin Kiri.

70.

Suntoro

Nureda

K. R.

(2022). OMNIBUS LAW: DOMINASI KEKUASAAN EKSEKUTIF DALAM PEMBENTUKAN LEGISLASI [Omnibus law: The dominance of executive power in the formation of legislation]. Veritas et Justitia, 8(1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v8i1.4340

71.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2011). Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2011 on the Right to Material Judicial Review [PERMA No. 1/2011]. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/209410/perma-no-1-tahun-2011

72.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Supreme court decree No. 61 of 2022.

73.

Tambunan

(2023). The intervention of oligarchy in the Indonesian legislative process. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(2), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231159395

74.

Tarabe

A. S.

(2018). Customary tenure systems and REDD+: Ensuring benefits for indigenous peoples. Tebtebba Foundation.

75.

Usop

S. R.

(2016). Ruang Masyarakat Adat dalam Pemanasan Global dan Perubahan Iklim Kasus Program REDD+ di Kalimantan Tengah [The space for Indigenous peoples in global warming and climate change: The case of the REDD+ program in Central Kalimantan]. Masyarakat Indonesia, 38(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v38i1.295

76.

Van Der Muur

. (2018). Forest conflicts and the informal nature of realizing Indigenous land rights in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445495

77.

Van Der Muur

W. E

. (2019). Land rights and the forces of adat in democratizing Indonesia: Continuous conflict between plantations, farmers, and forests in South Sulawesi. Leiden University. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/68271

78.

Yankey

I. K.

Onifade

T. T.

Sabau

(2024). Indigenous peoples in carbon pricing policymaking. Environmental Science & Policy, 162, 103927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103927

79.

Zahariadis

Allen

C. S.

(1995). Ideas, networks, and policy streams: Privatization in Britain and Germany. Review of Policy Research, 14(1–2), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00622.x

80.

Ziegenhain

(2008). The Indonesian legislature and its impact on democratic consolidation. In Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Routledge. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.eur.idm.oclc.org/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203934760-9/indonesian-legislature-impact-democratic-consolidation-patrick-ziegenhain