Alopecia Areata: An Updated Review for 2023

Abstract

Keywords

Epidemiology

Alopecia areata is an immune-mediated condition leading to non-scarring alopecia of the scalp and other hair-bearing areas of the body. It affects up to 2% of the global population.¹ It can affect all ages, but the prevalence appears higher in children compared to adults (1.92%, 1.47%).² A greater incidence has been reported in females than males, especially in patients with late-onset disease, defined as age greater than 50 years.³

Pathogenesis

Dysregulation of several pathways immune-mediated pathways has been implicated in the development of AA, occurring in susceptible patients often with concurrent multigenetic predisposition and environmental triggers.

In unaffected individuals, hair follicles have an immune privilege that is protective against autoimmunity. In patients with AA, attack of the hair follicle is thought to be directed at autoantigens in the follicle, mediated by disruption of its immune privilege, with both melanocyte and keratinocyte-related autoantigens being proposed.⁴ Immune attack has been attributed to activation of Th1, Th2 and Th17 cytokines, with Th1 cytokines (IL-2, TNF, IL-12) and Th17 (IL17 and IL17E) also correlating with disease activity.⁵

A genetic predisposition to AA is supported by the frequent history of affected family members. Several genome-wide associated studies have identified potential polymorphisms associated with disease. The strongest evidence is for a single nucleoid polymorphism in PTPN22, with weaker data supporting polymorphisms in FAS, FASL, PTPN22, CTLA4, and IL2RA.⁶

Several potential triggers of disease onset and flares have been identified. Viral infections associated with initial presentation and recurrence of AA include Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), hepatitis B and C viruses, and swine flu.⁷ Vaccines are another reported trigger, with many different vaccines implicated including influenza, hepatitis, and coronavirus.^8
-10

Associations

Alopecia areata is associated with many different comorbidities, including atopic diseases, metabolic syndrome, Helicobacter pylori infection, lupus erythematosus, iron deficiency anemia, thyroid diseases, psychiatric diseases, and vitamin D deficiency.¹¹ Autoimmune thyroid disease is a more commonly reported association, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.66; (95% CI, 0.82-3.38; prevalence, 13.9%), and thyroid dysfunction also frequently reported (OR 4.36; 95% CI, 1.19-15.99; prevalence, 12.5%). Other notable comorbidities in the systematic review included atopic dermatitis (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.80-3.09; prevalence, 9.6%), metabolic syndrome (OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.22-11.08; prevalence, 37.3%), Helicobacter pylori infection (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.23-3.34; prevalence, 62.8%), Lupus erythematosus (OR, 4.73; 95% CI, 3.70-6.10; prevalence, 0.8%), iron deficiency anemia (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.23-6.29; prevalence, 7.5%), and vitamin D deficiency (OR, 4.61; 95% CI, 2.33-9.10; prevalence, 65.4%).¹¹

With respect to psychiatric comorbidities, patients with AA appear to have a higher risk of both depression and anxiety.¹² The prevalence of anxiety is especially marked, with patients being reported to have 2.5-fold increased odds of having anxiety compared to control groups. Children and adolescents with AA have particularly high levels of anxiety.¹³ A recent study reported that 51% of pediatric AA patients met criteria for an anxiety disorder.¹⁴

Stress and anxiety have been implicated in triggering alopecia areata, and the burden and stigma associated with having alopecia has also been implicated in leading to anxiety in patients. Emotional stress can lead to increased catecholamines and decreased blood flow, and has been associated with upregulation of receptors for corticotropin-releasing hormone in skin around hair follicles.¹⁵

Presentation

There are multiple different patterns of presentation of hair loss in AA (Figure 1a-e). The most common is patch, with circular patches recognizable on the scalp or beard areas which may coalesce with progression. Ophiasis describes a band of alopecia along the parietal and occipital areas, whereas sisaipho refers to an opposite pattern. More extensive hair loss is seen in diffuse patterns, with a decrease in density diffusely, and totalis, with complete scalp alopecia.

Figure 1

Clinical Subtype Photos. a. Patch subtype with solitary patch. b. Patch subtype with multiple coalescing patches. c. Ophiasis Pattern. d. Sasaipho Pattern. e. Alopecia Totatalis

The presence of active disease can be assessed with the pull test. This involves grasping and firmly pulling on 50-60 hairs close to the scalp. A positive test, defined by >10% of hairs being pulled out, indicates active hair loss above normal shedding.¹⁶

There are also several nail findings associated with AA, with an overall prevalence of up to 30%.¹⁷ The most common changes include fine pitting in 0.6 to 11.4% of adults with AA, and trachyonychia in 8 to 14%. Less commonly reported findings include longitudinal ridging. Children may have a higher prevalence of nail pitting (13.2 to 18.8%), which is described as shallow pits in a grid-like distribution in contrast to the more irregularly distributed shallow pits seen with atopic dermatitis and the deeper irregular pits of psoriasis.

Trichoscopy

Many different signs have been described on examination of the scalp with a dermatoscope, which can aid in diagnosis and evaluation of disease activity (Table 1 and Figure 2a-d). The majority of these are not specific to AA, but some are sensitive, including yellow dots and short vellus hairs.^18,19 Yellow dots correspond with distention of the affected follicular infundibulum with keratinous material and sebum, and can help demonstrate persistence of hair follicles which are typically destroyed in scarring alopecias. Short vellus hairs, which are thin and nonpigmented, correlate with regrowth when seen within AA patches. Conversely, exclamation mark hairs and black dots are considered signs of active disease.²⁰ Exclamation marks hairs are fairly specific for AA; they have a wide distal shaft diameter that thins proximally, as a result of the lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate affecting the hair bulb. Black dots are the result of broken pigmented hair at the level of the scalp. An AA predictive score has been proposed based on 65 patients, with upright regrowing hairs and pigtail hairs given positive points for hair regrowth, while black dots, broken hairs, exclamation mark hairs, and tapered hairs are given negative points.²¹

Figure 2

Dermoscopy Photos. a. Black dots. b. Vellus Hairs in a regrowing patch. c. Upright regrowing hairs (right half) with a few exclamation mark hairs (left half). d. Empty Hair Follicles

Table 1

Trichoscopic Findings in AA and Their Significance

Sign	Description/ Etiology	Significance^a
Yellow Dots	Distention of the affected follicular infundibulum with keratinous material and sebum	Sensitive sign of AA Supports presence of non-scarring alopecia
Short Vellus Hairs	Thin and nonpigmented hairs	Sensitive sign of AA Supports regrowth when seen in AA
Black Dots	Broken pigmented hair at the level of the scalp	Specific for AA Supports presence of active disease Negative predictive marker for regrowth
Exclamation Mark Hairs	Pigmented short (1, 2mm) hairs with wide distal shaft diameter that thins proximally	Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate affecting the hair bulb Associated with active disease Negative predictive marker for regrowth
Tapered Hairs	Longer exclamation mark hairs (>2 mm)	Negative predictive marker for regrowth
Upright Regrowing hairs	Tapered end that thickens proximally, thicker than vellus hairs	Can be seen in many conditions Positive predictive marker for regrowth
Pigtail Hair	Short, regularly twisted hairs with short tapered end	Positive predictive marker for regrowth
Pohl-Pinkus Constrictions	Hairs with segmental thinning (constriction) or narrowing	Not specific for AA Presence of multiple segments supports cyclical disease activity

^aPredictive Markers based on Waskiel-Burnat et al

Work-Up

Consensus guidelines have been published to provide some guidance on the approach to investigations and treatment in patients with AA.^20,22 The diagnosis of AA can be made clinically in the vast majority of patients, with biopsies reserved for scenarios where a solitary patch is recalcitrant, when there is diffuse alopecia and when scarring alopecia cannot be excluded clinically. Biopsies should be performed at the edge of a patch and sectioned both horizontally and vertically for optimal interpretation.

Laboratory testing for comorbidities was not recommended uniformly in the consensus, with disagreement on the testing of thyroid and vitamin D. Tests to exclude potential mimickers of AA including fungal microscopy for tinea and capitis and viral serology for syphilis should be guided by clinical suspicion.

Assessment

Multiple assessment tools exist for objective scoring of alopecia.²³ The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score was initially described in 1999 and now referred to as the SALT I.²⁴ The tool involves splitting the scalp into 4 quadrants and summing the percentage of scalp area devoid of terminal hairs in each quadrant and then the whole scalp to provide a total area affected. It does not account for loss of facial hair (eyelashes, eyebrows, beard) or body hair. The Alopecia Density and Extent (ALODEX) score is a modification of the SALT score which increases the divisions of the scalp area to provide a more precise estimate of scalp surface area involvement.

Intervals of severity have also been proposed, where S0 = no hair loss; S1 = 1 to 24% hair loss; S2 = 25 to 49% hair loss; S3 = 50 to 74% hair loss; S4 = 75 to 99% hair loss; and S5 = 100% hair loss. Tools based on advanced photographic images of the scalp may provide better objective assessment of hair density and loss. One such system, Hairmount, was recently described and tested in 66 patients with AA aged of different races.²⁵ It provides a provides a percentage hair loss at every pixel that can be visualized as a contour plot for a qualitative evaluation.

In order to standardize treatment response assessment in clinical trials, an Investigator’s Global assessment was developed based on consensus from 10 experts and patients.²⁶ The majority agreed that for patients with ≥50% scalp hairloss, a successful treatment could be defined as regrowth to a SALT score of 20% or less.

A scoring system has also been proposed for assessment of hair loss severity of eyelashes, eyebrows, and nail findings, based on qualitative analysis of interviews with expert dermatologists and patients (Table 2).²⁷

Table 2

Assessment Scores for AA

Score	Components
SALT score	S0: no hair loss S1: 1% to 24% hair loss S2: 25% to 49% hair loss S3: 50% to 74% hair loss S4: 75% to 99%% hair loss S4A: 75% to 90% hair loss S4B: 91% to 99% hair loss S5: 100% hair loss
ClinRO Measure for Eyebrow Hair Loss (both eyebrows from 2 feet away)	0 The eyebrows have full coverage and no areas of hair loss 1 There are minimal gaps in eyebrow hair and distribution is even 2 There are significant gaps in eyebrow hair or distribution is not even 3 No notable eyebrow hair
ClinRO Measure for Eyelash Hair Loss (upper and lower eyelashes of both eyes)	0 The eyelashes form a continuous line along the eyelids on both eyes 1 There are minimal gaps and the eyelashes are evenly spaced along the eyelids on both eyes 2 There are significant gaps along the eyelids or the eyelashes are not evenly spaced along the eyelids 3 No notable eyelashes
ClinRO Measure for Nail Appearance (based on fingernails + toenails)	0 Nails are not at all damaged (e.g., pitted, rough, brittle, split) 1 At least 1 nail is a little damaged (e.g., pitted, rough, brittle, split) 2 At least 1 nail is moderately damaged (e.g., pitted, rough, brittle, split) 3 At least 1 nail is very damaged (e.g., pitted, rough, brittle, split) or subject has lost at least 1 nail
Alopecia Areata Progression Index	[%AA(L) ×SL(L) ×.18] + [%AA(R) ×SL(R) ×.18] + [%AA(T) ×SL(T) ×.4] + [%AA(B) ×SL(B) ×.24] %AA= % of surface area on the scalp: L = left, R = right, T = Top, B = bottom SL = Score of hair loss over 5 times: 0 = negative pull test, 1 = 10 to 20%, 2 => 20% of grasped hairs

Limitations of these scores include the lack of incorporation of disease activity or progression. One tool that incorporates the pull test is the Alopecia Areata Progression Index, where the surface area of active disease is multiplied by the degree of pull test positivity in each of 4 scalp quadrants (Table 2).²⁸

Quality of Life

There are several different assessment tools that can be used to qualify the impact of AA on quality of life (QOL).²⁹ Some challenges in characterizing impact include the frequent asymptomatic nature of the disease, in contrast to other dermatologic conditions such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and hidradenitis suppurativa.

AA-specific Health-related Quality of Life Instruments in include the AA Patients QOL (AAQ, 7 items directed at the past month), the AA QOL Index (AA-QLI, 21 items directed at the past month), and the AA Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS, 13 items directed at the past week). Hair-disease specific instruments have also been created, including the hairdex (48 items), the Hair-specific Skindex-29 (29 items), and the Scalpdex (23 items).

Although a single optimal tool has not been identified, the EADV task force suggested the use of the dermatology-specific DLQI questionnaire, hair disease-specific Scalpdex and either the AASIS or AA-QLI for the time being.²⁹

Treatments

Regrowth in patches of alopecia in AA in the absence of active treatment is well recognized, and likely affected by subtype of disease. Estimates of spontaneous regrowth can be calculated based on data from placebo-controlled trials of patients with AA.³⁰ In patients with patchy AA (10 studies, n = 264), regrowth occurred in 0% to 30.0%, with a pooled rate of 6.4% (CI:1.4-13.8) over a period of 1.5 to 11 months. In patients with severe disease (10 studies, n = 274): regrowth was reported in 0% to 33.3%, with a pooled rate of 7.2% (CI: 2.6-13.2) by 12-24 weeks.

Hair may initially regrow without pigment (Figure 3). Electron microscopy analysis of these regrowing nonpigmented hairs reveals fewer melanocytes and decreased melanization.³¹ This could be related to partial or incomplete melanocyte activation in early anagen of these follicles when there is still residual disease activity.

Figure 3

Patch type with non-pigmented hair regrowth

Camouflage

There are many different types of camouflage that can be offered and used by patients with AA. These include hairpieces (wigs, demiwigs, wiglets, toupees, cascades), hair thickening fibers, concealing powders.³² Semipermanent options include scalp micropigmentation which is a tattoo applied in a stippling pattern to mimic hair follicles. Realistic non-traumatic sticker tattoos can be useful for eyebrow regions and are a painless option in those who do not want a permanent option.³³

Microblading is an increasingly popular method of instilling pigment into the skin using a device and blade with stacked needles.³⁴ It is most commonly used to reproduce the appearance of eyebrows. Rare but concerning complications that have been reported include granulomatous reactions, sarcoid, allergic contact dermatitis, and preseptal cellulitis.^35

-38

Complementary and Alternative Medicines

A variety of different complementary and alternative treatments have been proposed to help treat AA as monotherapy or adjuncts. The best evidence exists for certain mixes of essential oils, topical garlic and oral glucosides of peony with compound glycyrrhizin.³⁹ Essential oils are thought to provide anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Two double blinded randomized controlled trials evaluated the use of a mixture of essential oils in adults with patchy AA compared to carrier oils alone. In the first study (n = 84), the combination of Thyme oil, rosemary oil, lavender oil, and Atlas cedarwood oil was association with 44% efficacy compared to 15% in the control group at 7 months.⁴⁰ The second evaluated the same combination with the addition of evening primrose oil in 40 patients, with 60% achieving at least moderate regrowth at 12 weeks with the intervention compared to 30% in the carrier oil group.⁴¹

Garlic may act as a topical irritant to trigger a contact dermatitis and distract the immune system from the hair follicle.³⁹ Its use in a 5% gel formulation in combination with betamethasone twice daily was reported to confer better efficacy as compared to betamethasone alone in a study of 40 children and adults with patchy AA at 3 months (95%, 5%, P = .001).⁴² However, a subsequent trial of garlic alone in children was terminated early because of lack of efficacy, suggesting more data is needed to clarify the context in which it may work best.⁴³

Finally, Glycyrrhizin is a plant extract that has been demonstrated to lower serum levels of Th17 cells, IL-6, IL-17, IL-22 and TGF-beta.⁴⁴ Two RCTs evaluated its use with vitamin B2, with and without the addition of glucosides of peony, one in adults with AA and >75% loss and one in pediatric patients with >50% loss. Marked regrowth was reported in 68.2% versus 71.4% of adults after 3 months, with non-significant superior regrowth in the combination group.⁴⁵ In children, marked regrowth was reported in 35% vs 45% at 3 months, with the combination group having statistically significantly higher regrowth rates.⁴⁶ On average, adverse effects were reported in 15% of patients across all groups in both studies, the most common being edema and weight gain.

Micronutrient Supplementation

Many patients and providers advocate for supplementation of micronutrients in the treatment of AA. Although data supports an association between lower levels of serum vitamin D, zinc, and folate levels in patients with AA as compared to controls, there is a lack of data evaluating the benefit of supplementation of these.⁴⁷

Anthralin

Anthralin is a contact irritant that has been used for many years to treat AA (Table 3). Treatment regimen vary greatly, with initial frequencies ranging from twice weekly to daily, and concentrations of 0.5% or 1% used in different vehicles. Most regimens involve gradual uptitration of frequency or contact duration until a target of skin irritation is achieved. In 4 studies of children with AA, the use of anthralin was associated with complete response rates between 32% and 33.3% with relapse rates of 9.5% to 64%.⁴⁸ In a trial of 60 patients over 13 years with patchy AA, anthralin application for 12 weeks was associated with complete response in 56% compared to 53.3% of a comparator group treated with azelaic acid.⁴⁹ Side effects of anthralin include staining of skin, regional lymphadenopathy, itching, burning, oozing, and bullous eruptions.⁴⁸ Although targeted, irritation can be treatment limiting, resulting in discontinuation of up to 11% of patients in some cohorts.⁵⁰

Table 3

Topical Treatments for AA: Highest Level of Evidence and Select Studies With Outcomes

Medication	Highest level of evidence	Dose/Frequency	Efficacy	Side effects
Anthralin	LoE 4: 1 prospective study (n = 31) 2 case series (n = 67), case reports	Anthralin 0.5 to 1% Titrated in frequency +contact time to target mild-moderate skin irritation	Complete regrowth: 32 to 56%	Staining of skin itching, burning, oozing bullous eruptions Lymphadenopathy
Contact Immunotherapy	LoE 1: Pooling of 45 studies (n = 2227)	Diphenylcyclopropenone 2% in acetone to a 4 × 4 cm area on scalp then after 2 weeks: 0.001% dilution 1 x/week, increasing concentration to a goal of mild eczema	Complete regrowth: 42.6% Major regrowth (>70%): 56.1%	Severe eczema: 30.8% Lymphadenopathy: 25.7% Generalized eczema: 16% Hyperpigmentation: 12.7% Influenza-like illness: 11% Contact urticaria: 9% Folliculitis: 7.1%
Calcipotriol	LoE 2: 1 prospective study (n = 22) Retrospective review (n = 48) Combinations: Randomized open label trial (n = 60) Comparative study (n = 100) Comparative study (n = 60)	0.005% lotion or cream twice daily 0.005% cream BID with clobetasol 0.005% cream BID with mometasone 0.005% / betamethasone diproprionate BID	12 week: SALT50: 46.2% (6/22) SALT100: 9% (2/22), 27.1% (13/48) 3 month change in SALT: 4.5 (combo) vs 3.1 (clobetasol alone) 2.92 (combo) vs 2.42 (mometasone alone) 53.6% combo vs 48.6% (clobetasol alone)	Irritation, erythema, pruritus, pigmentation, folliculitis: 31.8% (7/22) None Folliculitis (2%, 4%), erythema (2%), dermatitis (2%), atrophy (2%, 4%); Not specified (“fewer side effects” with calcipotriol)
Tacrolimus	LoE 3 Comparative studies and open label studies	0.1% ointment twice daily	Good regrowth: 0 to 17%	None reported
Corticosteroids	LoE 2 RCT, prospective, single blind (n = 42) RCT (n = 70)	Multiple options Clobetasol BID vs Hydrocortisone BID Desoximetasone 0.25% BID	Response at wk 24: Clobetasol 85% (vs Hydrocortisone 33%) 3 month CR: 58% (vs placebo 39%)	Clobetasol: Atrophy: 5% (n = 1/20) Irritation/acne: 12%
Prostaglandin Analogs	LoE 3 Retrospective review (n = 41) Prospective studies (n = 17, N = 71⁷² Prospective unblinded study (n = 44)	Bimatoprost 0.3 mg/ml solution daily or BID latanoprost 0.005% once daily	Eyelash growth at 1 yr: CR: 24% (10/41) Increased length/thickness: 2 year regrowth: CR: 17.5%, none: 25%	Conjunctivitis: 7.3%

Abbreviations: CR, complete regrowth; PR, good/moderate regrowth.

Levels of Evidence (LoE):

Level 1 (systematic review of randomized controlled trials [RCTs] or high-quality randomized controlled trial)

Level 2 (lesser quality RCT or prospective cohort study) level 3 (case-control study, non-randomized controlled cohort or follow-up study)

Level 4 (case series), or level 5 (expert opinion, mechanism-based reasoning).

Contact Immunotherapy

Topical application of sensitizing chemicals on patches of alopecia has been used extensively to treat AA (Table 3). The outcome of induced contact dermatitis on applied areas has been shown to induce apoptosis of perifollicular lymphocytes, resulting in regrowth in AA patches.⁵¹ The most commonly reported agents are diphenylcyprone and Squaric acid dibutyl ester. In a meta-analysis of 45 studies (n = 2227 patients), complete regrowth was reported in 42.6% of patients with patchy alopecia, with major regrowth defined by >70% in 56.1%.⁵² Better outcomes were associated with SALT scores < 50, lack of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, or asthma), and lack of nail involvement. Adverse effects include severe or generalized eczema, lymphadenopathy, flu-like symptoms and contact urticaria (Table 2). Recurrences were reported in 48.5% of patients (n = 637).

Corticosteroids

Steroids are used in topical, injectable, and systemic formulations in the treatment of AA (Tables 3 and 4). A large range of different topical corticosteroids are used in practice in varied regimens, and often in combination with other topical or systemic treatments. Few studies have formally evaluated the efficacy of topical steroids as monotherapy.^48,53
-55 In pediatric patients with AA, response is as high as 85% with clobetasol monotherapy after 24 weeks compared to 33% with hydrocortisone (n = 40), with atrophy reported in 5% (n = 1).⁵⁶ In 70 patients older than 15 years, dexosimetasone twice daily resulted in full regrowth in 58% at 3 months compared to 39% of patients applying placebo (n = 53).⁵⁵ Adverse effects included acneiform eruptions, burning and irritation in 12% in the corticosteroid group but no atrophy.

Table 4

Systemic Treatments for AA With select studies, regimens and outcomes of interest.

Medication	Highest level of evidence	Select dosing/ Frequency	Efficacy	Side effects
Minoxidil	LoE 2 retrospective study (n = 12 adults with tofacitinib)	2.5 mg PO daily (F) 2.5 mg PO BID (Male)	>75% SALT: 67% (combo with tofacitinib)	Hypertrichosis 50%
Antihistamines	LoE 2 1 RCT (fexofenadine) 3 clinical trials 3 retrospective reviews 2 case series 3 case reports	Fexofenadine 60-120mg/day Ebastine 20 mg/da y Oxatamide 60 mg/day	Hair regrowth Decreased erythema and pruritus	Headache with fexofenadine (n = 2) Mild sedation with ebastine
Systemic Coticosteroids	LoE 1 PULSE DOSING Any age: 41 studies (n = 1078) including 1 randomized placebo-controlled trial Children: 8 studies (n = 216)	Dexamethasone 2.5-5mg x2days/wkMethylprednisolone 500 mg-1g x1-3 days/month Dexamethasone 1.5 mg/kg/day x1-3days/month Methylprednisolone 8-30mg/kg/day x1-3 days/month	CR: 43% (466/1078) >50 regrowth:56%	Total SEs: 21% (225/1078) Acne: 0.01% (3/216) GI discomfort (7/216) Headache: 8/216 Cushings: 0.01% (2/216) Allergic reaction
Methotrexate	LoE 1 Adults: 11 studies (n = 361) Children: At least 6 studies (n = 68)	Adults: 15-25mg/week Children: 7.5-25mg/week (0.2, 0.4mg/kg/week)	Complete response: 45.7% (165/361)Good/complete response: 70.3% (154/219) Good/complete response:50% (34/68)	Total AEs: 24.2% (64/319) (Gastrointestinal symptoms, liver and hematologic abnormalities, all < 5%) Total AEs: 14.5% (6/44)
Cyclosporine	14 studies (n = 340)	Cyclosporine monotherapy: 5-6mg/kg/day Cyclosporine with systemic steroid: 2-4mg/kg/day	Response rate at end of treatment: CsA alone: 69.41%; (0 to 80%) CsA with steroid: 57.02% (6.67 to 100%)	Overall AEs: 36.8% (125/340) Gastrointestinal: n≥28 Hypertrichosis: n≥20 Hypertension: n≥9 Dyslipidemia: n≥8 Headache: n≥7
Azathioprine	LoE 1 Open-label pilot study (n = 20) Open-label, randomized comparative study (n = 50)	Azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day Azathioprine (Aza) 300 mg weekly vs Betamethasone (BM) 5 mg/dy x 2 days/wk	6 months: SALT < 25%: 50% 4 months: Change in SALT: Aza: 9.5 (0-13.5) BM: 14 (4-19)	Transaminitis: 5% (n = 1) Leukopenia: 15% (n = 3) Nausea/Vomiting: 5% (n-1) Aza: nausea: 35% BM: facial puffiness: 76.2% wt gain 33%, GERD 24%, Acne 24%, striae 9.5%
Dupilumab (IL4/13 inhibitor)	LoE 1 Randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial (n = 40)	300 mg subcutaneous once weekly	Week 24 SALT £30: Dupilumab: 17.5% Placebo: 10%	Week 24: Injection site reaction: 5% Conjunctivitis: 7.5% URTI: 5%
Tofacitinib (JAK1/3 inhibitor)	LoE 2 Open label comparative study, Case series	5 mg PO BID	Month 6 SALT50: 78.4%	URTI 8.1% Folliculitis 10.8% Headache: 5.4% wt gain: 5.4% Triglyceride increase 5.4%
Baricitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor)	LoE 1 2 randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trials (n = 654 + 546)	2 or 4 mg PO daily	Week 36 SALT ≤20: 4 mg: 38.8% 2 mg: 22.8% Placebo: 6.2%	Acne: 4.7%,5.8% Zoster: 0.9%, 1.9% HSV: 0%, 3.9% CK increase: 0%, 5.7% LDL increase: 20.5%, 30.3%
Beprocitinib (TYK2, JAK1/2 inhibitor)	LoE 1 Phase 2 a RCT (n = 47)	60 mg PO daily x 4 wks then 30 mg daily x 20 weeks	Week 24 SALT 50: 53.2%	URTI/Nasopharyngitis 32% Acne 11% Headache 9% *Rhabdomyolysis in 2/47
Ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor)	LoE 2 Open label comparative study	2 ng PO BID	Month 6 SALT50: 84.2%	Urinary tract infection 13.2% Headache 5.3% Folliculitis 2.6% wt gain 2.6% AST/ALT increase 7.9%
Deuroxolitinib (deuterated ruxolitinib)	LoE 2 Phase 2 clinical trial in adults (n = 140)	4 mg PO BID or 8mg PO BID or 12mg PO BID	Week 24 SALT ≤50% 12 mg: 58% 8 mg: 47% 4 mg: 21% Placebo: 9%	Acne: 13.48-16.7% Headache: 17.2- 19.4% CK increase: 10.3%, 5.3%, 2.8% LDL increase: 0, 10.5%, 0
Ritlecitinib (JAK3 inhibitor)	LoE 1 Phase 2 a RCT(n = 48)	200 mg PO daily x 4 wks then 50 mg daily x 20 weeks	Week 24 SALT 50: 39.6%	URTI/Nasopharyngitis 21% Acne 10% Headache 13% Folliculitis 6%

Abbreviations: CR, complete regrowth; PR, good/moderate regrowth.

Levels of Evidence (LoE):

Level 1 (systematic review of randomized controlled trials [RCTs] or high-quality randomized controlled trial)

Level 2 (lesser quality RCT or prospective cohort study)

level 3 (case-control study, non-randomized controlled cohort or follow-up study)

Level 4 (case series), or level 5 (expert opinion, mechanism-based reasoning).

Intralesional injection of corticosteroids has been reported to lead to better responses compared to topical steroids.^57,58 The most commonly used steroid for this purpose is triamcinolone acetonide, although betamethasone diproprionate use has been reported and may be associated with fewer adverse effects.^59,60 Different concentrations have been used, but comparative studies reported no increased efficacy of higher concentrations (10 mg/ml) versus the more commonly used 5mg/mL.⁶¹ Another method of triamcinolone administration is microneedling delivery, although this was not shown to offer any efficacy advantage over intradermal injections in a prospective randomized trial of 60 patients.⁶²

Systemic steroids have been used in a variety of regimens including intravenous or oral, and pulses or continuous administration.⁶³ A systematic review of pulse systemic steroids in adults and children with AA included 41 studies (1078 patients), of which only 1 was randomized controlled study.⁶³ Overall, complete response was reported in 43% (466/1078) of all patients, with relapses reported in 17%. In this review, pediatric patients had slightly higher response rates (51%) but also higher relapse rates (60%). Side effects were reported in 21% (n = 225) of all patients, and 12% of children (n = 8). In a subsequent pediatric review of 8 studies (216 children), 56% reported >50% regrowth of scalp hair.⁶⁴

Prostaglandin Analogs

Bimatoprost and latanoprost are prostaglandin analogs available in solutions for ophthalmic instillation that were noted to cause hypertrichosis when used to treat glaucoma.⁶⁵ This is likely related to their action on prostaglandin F receptors expressed in eyelash hair follicles in the dermal papilla and outer root sheath.⁶⁶

In prospective studies, latanoprost use on eyelids was associated with complete eyelash regrowth in 17.5% of 40 patients, and no response in 25% after 2 years.⁶⁷ On the scalp, monotherapy was less effective than betamethasone diproprionate in 50 adults with scalp AA after 16 weeks.⁶⁸ When added to clobetasol in a study of 30 patients with scalp AA, its use was associated with significantly increased hair density (37.2 +/- 26.1 vs. . 14.6 +/- 18.6) and regrowth (58.3 +/- 39.3 vs. . 21.6 +/- 24.1) compared to clobetasol alone at 12 weeks.⁶⁹ Similarly, the addition of latanoprost to betamethasone was associated with better SALT score reductions at a randomized controlled trial of 108 patients after just 2 weeks.⁷⁰ Of note, latanoprost is associated with irreversible iridial pigmentation at a high frequency (6.3% of patients at 1 month, 15.7% at 3 months, 37.8% at 6 months, and 56.5% at 12 months).⁷¹

The efficacy of bimatoprost has been limited in individuals with AA. A prospective study of pediatric patients with eyelash loss secondary to AA or chemotherapy (n = 71) did not demonstrate a treatment benefit in the AA subgroup.⁷² Another prospective study of adults with AA (n = 17) reported increase in length and thickness of eyelashes at 4 months, although there was no growth of new eyelashes.⁷³ Conversely, a retrospective study of 41 patients with AU reported complete regrowth in 24% after 1 year, with a mean time to regrowth of 4-8 months.⁷⁴ Application on patches on the scalp twice daily was associated with regrowth, with better response at a faster rate compared to mometasone in a study of 30 adults with S1 patchy disease.⁷⁵

Calcineurin Inhibitors

Topical tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, is associated with decreasing several cytokines including IL-2, IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha.⁷⁶ Its use has been evaluated in several studies and case reports in scalp AA with disappointing results overall. Good regrowth has been reported in 0 to 17% of treated patients, with inferior rates compared to topical steroids in several studies.^58,77
-79 It is typically administered twice daily. Side effects are minimal, with none reported in several studies (Table 3).

Calcipotriol and Intralesional Vitamin D

Calcipotriol is a vitamin D analog that has been used topically with reported success in patients with AA. Vitamin D receptors (1,25-(OH)2) are known to be expressed in hair follicles, with a decrease in this expression reported in active alopecia areata patches.⁸⁰ Calcipotriol is also proposed to promote a shift in phenotype from Th1 to Th2.⁸¹ In a prospective study of 22 adults with limited patchy AA, total regrowth was achieved in 9% at 12 weeks, and SALT50 achieved in 46.2% (6/22).⁸² Better response was associated with lower baseline vitamin D levels. In a retrospective review of 48 patients with mild-moderate AA (S1 or S2) who had failed topical steroids, calcipotriol monotherapy was associated with total hair regrowth in 27.1% (13/36) at 12 weeks, with 10 patients remaining free of recurrence at 1 year.⁸³

There are also comparative studies reporting improved responses with the combination of calcipotriol with potent corticosteroids, including mometasone and clobetasol as compared to monotherapy with the same corticosteroids.^77,84,85 Another study in 60 adults compared the combination of calcipotriol with betamethasone diproprionate to clobetasol, with a statistically small but significant improvement noted with the combination product after 3 months (53.6% mean SALT improvement vs 48.6%). The vast majority of patients in all groups in these studies were noted to have low vitamin D levels.

Intralesional Vitamin D has also been studied as a potential treatment for AA. In a randomized placebo-controlled trial of 60 adults with patchy AA, 1 ml of Vitamin D injected intralesionally every 4 weeks for up to 3 sessions was associated with a regrowth score of 4 in 53% (n = 16) compared to 0% in patients receiving saline injections.⁸⁶ Adverse effects included pain during injection (66.7%, 60%), pinpoint bleeding (33.3%, 43%) and vasovagal attack (4%, 0%) in patients treated with vitamin D vs controls.

Cyclosporine

Cyclosporine is a systemic calcineurin inhibitor usually given orally twice daily. Its use in AA was evaluated in a systematic review of 14 studies and 340 patients, excluding case reports⁸⁷ (Table 4). Overall, 65% of patients were reported to respond to cyclosporine, with increased response rates in patients receiving concurrent systemic corticosteroids compared to without (69.4%, 57.0%). Adverse effects were reported in 36.8%, including gastrointestinal symptoms, hypertrichosis, hypertension, dyslipidemia and headache. Factors associated with decreased incidence of relapse include concurrent corticosteroid treatment, increased duration of cyclosporine treatment more than 6 months, but not the daily dose.⁸⁸

Azathioprine

Azathioprine, a purine antagonist, is known to impair T-cell function and activation. In an open-label pilot study, 20 patients with AA affecting ≥20% of the scalp were treated with azathioprine monotherapy at 2mg/kg/day.⁸⁹ After 6 months, 2 patients had complete regrowth and 8 patients had <25% of the scalp affected. Side effects included increased liver enzymes in 1 patient requiring discontinuation, mild intermittent leukopenia in 3 patients, and nausea/vomiting in 1 patient. Subsequently, an open-label comparative clinical trial in 50 adults with AA and >10% scalp involvement evaluated the addition of azathioprine to twice weekly systemic betamethasone. After 4 months, the median percent scalp hair regrowth and the median change in SALT score was 44.52 and 9.5 in WAP group compared to 71.43 and 14 in betamethasone group.⁹⁰

Methotrexate

Methotrexate, a folic acid antagonist, has been demonstrated to inhibit upregulation of IL-15 and decrease levels of IFN-gamma and IL-2 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.⁹¹ There is evidence for the use of methotrexate as both monotherapy and combination with steroids in treating AA in children and adults (Table 4). In a systematic review that included 11 studies of adults with AA, complete response was reported in 45.7% (165/361) and good or complete response in 70.3% (154/219).⁹² Combination treatment of methotrexate with corticosteroids resulted in good or complete response in 72.7% (56/77) compared to 48.6% (18/37) without. Onset of hair regrowth based on 6 studies was 3.13 (95% CI 2.3-4.0) months, and recurrence rate based on 9 studies was 52% (100/192). Adverse effects were reported in 24.2% (64/319), with gastrointestinal symptoms being the most common as well as liver enzyme or hematologic abnormalities in <5% of patients.

There have also been several studies in children treated with methotrexate. Overall, methotrexate has been associated with lower response rates compared to adults, but also fewer recurrences after stopping and fewer side effects. Pooled data from 5 studies in children treated with methotrexate reported good or complete response in 50% (34/68).⁹³ An additional retrospective review reported partial response in 4 of 7 children treated with MTX.⁹⁴ Recurrence rate in children based on 4 studies was 31.7% (9/30), and adverse effects were reported in 14.5% (6/44).⁹²

Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors

JAK inhibitors are small molecules that interfere with the signaling of multiple cytokines that are implicated in AA including interferon-γ and interleukin-15.⁹⁵ Several JAK inhibitors have been used to treat AA in both topical and systemic formulations (Table 4).

Tofacitinib is a selective JAK1/3 inhibitor that has been used to treat patients with AA in multiple different topical formulations and concentrations. In general, results with topical formulation on scalp hair are unpredictable and do not commonly result in complete hair regrowth, likely related to suboptimal absorption and penetration to the level of the inflammatory infiltrate in AA.⁹⁶ The use of tofacitinib has also been reported for eyelash and facial hair growth. In a series of 119 patients, topical tofacitinib was associated with complete regrowth of eyebrows and eyelashes in 41% and 46% of patients respectively.⁹⁷ Systemic treatment has been reported in many case series in both adults and children.^98

-103 In a meta-analysis of 14 studies of patients treated with tofacitinib including 275 patients, pooled good/complete hair regrowth rate was reported in 54.0% (95% CI: 46.3% to 61.5%), and pooled partial response was 26.1% (20.7 to 32.2%).¹⁰⁴ Adverse effects from an open label study of 5 mg BID included folliculitis (10.8%), headache (5.4%) and weight gain (5.4%).¹⁰⁵ Weight increase has been postulated to result from leptin inhibitors wth some JAK inhibitors.¹⁰⁶ Relapse with discontinuation was reported in 25% of patients. Sublingual tofacitinib may offer increased absorption and decreased gastrointestinal side effects by bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism.¹⁰⁷

Ruxolitinib is a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor available in a 1.5% cream formulation with diasppointing data for treatment of AA. Its efficacy was evaluated in 78 patients aged ≥18 years with AA characterized by a baseline SALT of ≥25.¹⁰⁸ After 24 weeks of twice daily application, there was no significant difference in rates of 50% improvement in the ruxolitinib group compared to the group applying vehicle alone; no significant adverse effects were noted. Conversely, systemic administration is effective. In a study of adults, 20 mg BID was associated with SALT50 in 84.2% of 38 participants, with main adverse events including urinary tract infections (13.2%), headache (5.3%), elevated liver enzymes (7.9%), folliculitis (2.6%) and weight gain (2.6%).¹⁰⁵

There is some data reporting inferiority of topical JAK inhibitors to topical steroids in AA. A double blind, placebo-controlled pilot study evaluated 1% topical ruxolitinib, 2% tofactinib, clobetasol and placebo to 4 different locations in 16 adult patients with alopecia universalis (bilateral temples and eyebrows).¹⁰⁹ After 12 weeks, there was good regrowth in 10 locations treated with topical clobetasol compared to 6 locations with tofacitinib, 5 with ruxolitinib and none with placebo application.

Baricitinib, a selective reversible inhibitor of JAK1 and 2, was recently approved by the FDA for adult patients with severe alopecia areata. The approved dose is 2 mg PO daily which can be increased to 4 mg. If patients have severe AA or involvement of eyelashes and eyebrows, treatment can be initiated with 4 mg and decreased to 2 mg once response has been achieved. The efficacy was demonstrated in a phase 3 randomized double blinded placebo-controlled trial in which more than 30% of patients achieved a SALT score ≤20 after 36 weeks of treatment.¹¹⁰ Participants were aged 18 yrs or older with a baseline SALT of ≥50. Eyelash and Eyebrow ClinRO scores of 0-1 were reported in 36.2 to 36.8% and 35.2 to 38.9% of patients taking 4 mg of bariticinib daily at 36 weeks. Adverse effects included acne, infections, and LDL and CK elevations (Table 4). The likelihood of response has been shown to be influenced by the duration of alopecia, with patients who have not had growth in 10 years or more being less likely to respond.

Ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3 and TEC (tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma) inhibitor, and Beprocitinib, a TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor, have also been studied in AA patients. A phase 2 a study randomized adults with AA and a SALT of ≥50 to daily ritlecitinib (n = 48), beprocitinib (n = 47) or placebo (n = 47). At 24 weeks, a SALT score ≤30 was achieved by 50% of patients receiving ritlecitinib, 64% receiving brepocitinib, and 2% receiving placebo.¹¹¹ Subsequently, 5 dosing regimens of Ritlecitinib (30 mg or 50 mg daily with or without a 200 mg loading dose or 10 mg daily) were evaluated in a Phase 2b/3 placebo-controlled study.¹¹² After 24 weeks, efficacy was demonstrated in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest dosing regimen associated with a SALT score of ≤20 in 38% of participants at 24 weeks, compared to 1% of those receiving the lowest dose.

Interim results from the phase 3 open-label, multi-center long term study of ritlecitinib were presented orally at the EADV in September 2022 (ALLEGRO-LT), with 62.5% of 56 patients having a SALT ≤ 10 at 24 weeks, and 69.6% having a SALT ≤ 20.¹¹³ There were 447 patients included in the safety analysis with mean duration of treatment of 487 days ± 167, with 85.7% of patients being treated for at least 12 months. The most common adverse effects were headache (16.3%), acne (11.6%), and nasopharyngitis (8.5%). Herpes zoster was reported in 0.9%, and 13.4% had a positive SARS-COV-2 test, with serious infection in 2 patients (0.4%).

Deuruxolitinib (CTP-543) is a deuterated form of ruxolitinib. A dose ranging phase 2 trial was performed in 140 adults with AA for 6 months or longer, which reported SALT score decrease of 50% or more in 58% of participants receiving the highest dose (12 mg BID) amd 21% of those receiving 4 mg BID.¹¹⁴ Adverse effects included acne and headache in a dose dependent fashion (13.5 to 16.7% and 17.2 to 19.4%). More participants had CK increases in the lowest dose (10.3%) and LDL increased were highest with 8 mg BID (10.5%), but this was a relatively small study. There were no episodes of bleeding or thrombosis.

Minoxidil

Minoxidil is an antihypertensive that has been available in topical formulations and approved for androgenetic alopecia treatment since the 1990s. Several mechanisms of action in alopecia have been postulated including hair follicle aATP-dependent potassium channel activation, stimulation of adenosine dependent VEGF, prolongation of anagen and shortening telogen phases, and vasodilation leading to increase cutaneous delivery of oxygen and growth factors to hair follicles.¹¹⁵ It may also suppress Tcell functioning.¹¹⁶ It is activated to a sulfate form by a sulfotransferase in the hair follicle, thus patients with high activity of this enzyme may exhibit a higher response.¹¹⁷ In support of this theory is the benefit afforded with use of a newer formula that increases the activity of this enzyme in regrowing hair for males with androgenetic alopecia.¹¹⁸ Multiple studies support efficacy of the 5% formulation in children and adults with patchy AA.¹¹⁹ In a meta-analysis that included 6 studies (n = 255), minoxidil use was associated with significant regrowth rates compared to placebo of 7.86 (95% 3.74,16.5).¹¹⁹ Commercially available products include foam and solution vehicles with concentrations of 2 to 5%. The foam concentration has been associated with less hypertrichosis in men with androgenetic alopecia, and the propylene glycol in the solution has been associated with both irritant and allergic contact dermatitis.^120

-124 Much less common side effects reported include acquired trichorrhexis nodosa (possibly more notable in curly hair), headaches, edema, and rarely pericardial effusion.

Low dose systemic (oral) minoxidil has been used with increasing frequency in the past few years to treat a large range of alopecias (Table 4). In a case series of patients with AA, efficacy of low dose oral minoxidil ranged from 18 to 82.4%.¹¹⁶ Side effects reported with the use of minoxidil use for many different types of alopecia include hypertrichosis in up to 24%, pedal edema in 2%, postural hypotension in 1.1% and heart rate alterations in 1.3% of patients.¹²⁵ Many have adopted the practice of giving minoxidil in combination with other systemic agents, a clear advantage being the lack of added immunosuppression in these cases. A small retrospective review of 12 patients with AA who were prescribed minoxidil 2.5 mg daily (females) or BID (men) with tofacitinib, 67% achieved 75% scalp regrowth, with the most common side effect being hypertrichosis in 50%.¹²⁶ Pediatric use has also been described: in a series of 63 children aged 0-12yrs treated with 0.025-0.5mg daily, side effects included facial/back hypertrichosis (n = 13), postural hypotension (n = 4) and headaches (n = 2).¹²⁷ Accidental exposure to higher doses (mean dose 0.9 mg/kg/day) to 20 children aged 2 months-13 years through contaminated omeprazole has also allowed review of safety.¹²⁸ In this cohort, systemic side effects were reported in 3 patients (diarrhea/anxiety in 1, headache/facial edema in 1, and asthenia in 1), and hypertrichosis in 13 patients (65%).

Antihistamines

Several antihistamines have been reported to help patients with AA (Table 4). Proposed mechanisms include targeting perifollicular mast cells that are increased in subacute AA and stimulated by CD8 +tcells and IFNgamma.¹²⁹ A recent systematic review included 343 patients treated with various antihistamines: all reported, decreased pruritus and erythema, but only fexofenadine, oxatamide, and ebastine were associated with hair regrowth.¹³⁰

Hydroxychloroquine

Hydroxychloroquine is a systemic antimalarial known to affect the immune system via interference with Toll-like receptors and prevents activation of interferon-1.¹³¹ Its efficacy as treatment of AA was reported in 9 children who received doses of 50-400mg daily for 4-24 months, with partial regrowth in 56%, and none achieving full regrowth.¹³² Adverse effects included abdominal pain and headache.

Apremilast

Apremilast inhibits phosphodiesterase 4, resulting in a decrease in the production of multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines. Its lack of immunosuppressive effects confer a favorable side effect profile when compared to traditional immunosuppressants. Unfortunately, it was not effective in a small pilot study of 30 patients who were randomized to receive apremilast (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) orally for 24 weeks.¹³³ Only 1 patient achieved a 50% reduction in SALT at 24 weeks, and 8 patients withdrew from the apremilast arm due to lack of effect or side effects.

HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (statins) have been demonstrated to decrease proinflammatory cytokines, including IFN-g, TNF-a, IL-1b, and IL-6, which contribute to AA disease.¹³⁴ A combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe in a series of patients with AA affecting 40 to 70% of the scalp reported regrowth in 14 of 19 patients who completed 24 weeks of treatment.¹³⁵ However, in 2 other subsequent studies, there was no significant regrowth reported, calling into question the potential efficacy of this combination treatment.^136,137

Dupilumab

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-4 and IL-13, leading to downregulation of Th2-mediated inflammation. The role of Dupilumab in the treatment or triggering of AA continues to be studied, with cases of regrowth of AA in patients with atopic dermatitis contrasted with cases of new onset AA in others.¹³⁰ One possible but unproven explanation for the divergent responses to dupilumab involves considering AA in four classifications described by Ikeda.¹³⁸ In patients with severe atopic dermatitis and AA that is being perpetuated by massive interferon release, control of the dermatitis may be enough to allow for resolution of the alopecia. Conversely, in patients without preexisting AA, treatment with dupilumab may lead to a shift in the immune system, triggering alopecia areata mediated by autoreactive CD8 +T cells.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effect of weekly dupilumab for 48 weeks in 40 patients aged 18 years or older with alopecia areata with a minimum of 30% hair loss for 6 months.¹³⁹ Patients with increased baseline IgE and a personal or family history of atopy were more likely to regrow compared to controls (Table 4). Side effects included conjunctivitis (7.5%, 0%), injection site reactions (5%, 0%), and Upper respiratory tract infections (5%, 5%) in dupilumab compared to placebo groups at 24 weeks. In children, a recent case series of 16 patients with both atopic dermatitis and AA who were treated with dupilumab reported good regrowth in 4 of 8 children who had follow-up at 4 months.¹⁴⁰

Secukinumab

Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal IgG Antibody that inhibits IL-17A and F. Its use to treat AA was evaluated in a double-blinded, randomized prospective pilot study of 11 subjects, but none of the 7 participants achieved the primary outcome of SALT50 at week 24.¹⁴¹ No adverse events were reported.

Platelet Rich Plasma

Platelet Rich Plasma is a product that is prepared from whole blood that contains platelets, growth factors and cytokines. It is produced by centrifuging whole blood from a patient and is injected into affected alopecia skin. Its efficacy in the treatment of AA has been evaluated in multiple studies, using a large range of different protocols.¹⁴² Pooled results from 4 studies (n = 201 adults with AA), PRP was associated with nonsignficantly different decreases in SALT scores compared to traimcinolone acetonide injections (mean difference −2, CI −4.7-0.65, P: 0.14). Recurrence rates with PRP were lower than triamcinolone in 1 study (0%, 38% at 6 months, and 31% vs 71% at 12 months).¹⁴³ The most common cited adverse effect is pain, reported in 12% of PRP patients vs 0% of triamcinolone patients in a study of 50 adults.¹⁴⁴

Laser

Laser and Light therapies are another treatment modality that have been used in patients with AA. Types of laser reported include the fractional CO2 laser, the He-Ne laser, the 308 nm excimer laser, as well as light therapy with narrow-band UVB.¹⁴⁵

Fractional CO2 is thought to lead to apoptosis of the perifollicular lymphocytes, with effects including prolongation of anagen phase and increased blood flow to the dermal papilla. Five studies (n = 372) evaluating the use of this laser with minoxidil compared to minoxidil alone all reported superior response with fractional CO2, with a pooled response rate ratio of 1.29 (95% CI 1.14, 1.46).¹⁴⁵ Adverse effects include burning, irritation and hyperpigmentation.

The 308 nm excimer laser is also proposed to target and decrease the perifollicular lymphocyte infiltration, although depth of penetration may not be sufficient in most cases. Pooled response rate was greater in patients receiving the laser based on 3 studies (total N = 224, rate ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.12, 1.55). Phototherapy with narrow band UVB (311 nm) has a similar proposed mechanism of action and limitations. Its use was not associated with statistically superior responses compared to topical calcipotriol in study of 60 patients, and monotherapy was inferior to combination with intramuscular steroids in a retrospective reivew of 25 patients.^146,147

Prognosis

In a study of 75 patients with AA diagnosed in childhood or adolescence, 34.7% had full-hair regrowth over a period of >10 years, and 32.0% had no hair regrowth or aggravation.¹⁴⁸ Severity of AA at time of first consultation is an important prognostic factor, demonstrated in a study of 191 patient in which lack of disease at a mean follow-up of 17.74 years was present in 68.3% of patients with S1 at initial consultation compared to 9.1% of patients with S4.¹⁴⁹ A review of 9 studies (689 patients) with long-term outcome data reported recovery rates of 17.9% for AT and 9.3% for AU.¹⁵⁰

Factors associated with more progression to extensive disease (AU or AT) were identified in a survey study of 531 patients, including younger age of onset (P < .001), concurrent autoimmune or atopic disease (P = .047), atopic dermatitis (P = .021) and thyroid disease (P = .012).¹⁵¹

Conclusion

This review highlights the recent increase in important research on pathogenesis, associated comorbidities, and treatment modalities for AA. Given how prevalent AA is in the general population and its potential impacts on quality of life, continuation of these research efforts are needed to define optimal approaches to evaluation and management of those affected by this condition.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Cathryn Sibbald

References

Zhou

Wang

Zhang

. Alopecia areata: an update on etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2021;61(3):403-423.doi:10.1007/s12016-021-08883-0

34403083

Lee

HH.

Gwillim

Patel

et al. Epidemiology of alopecia areata, ophiasis, totalis, and universalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(3):675-682.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.032

31437543

MC.

Yang

C-C.

Tsai

RY.

Chen

. Late-onset alopecia areata: a retrospective study of 73 patients from Taiwan. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(4):468-472.doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04467.x

22339888

Jadeja

SD.

Tobin

. Autoantigen discovery in the hair loss disorder, alopecia areata: implication of post-translational modifications. Front Immunol. 2022;13:890027. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.890027

35720384

Waśkiel-Burnat

Osińska

Salińska

et al. The role of serum Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokines in patients with alopecia areata: clinical implications. Cells. 2021;10(12):3397. doi:10.3390/cells10123397

34943905

Gil-Quiñones

SR.

Sepúlveda-Pachón

IT.

Sánchez Vanegas

Gutierrez-Castañeda

. Effect of PTPN22, Fas/FasL, IL2RA and CTLA4 genetic polymorphisms on the risk of developing alopecia areata: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0258499. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258499

34735462

Fukuyama

Ito

Ohyama

. Alopecia areata: current understanding of the pathophysiology and update on therapeutic approaches, featuring the Japanese dermatological association guidelines. J Dermatol. 2022;49(1):19-36.doi:10.1111/1346-8138.16207

34709679

Sundberg

JP.

Silva

KA.

Zhang

et al. Recombinant human hepatitis B vaccine initiating alopecia areata: testing the hypothesis using the C3H/HeJ mouse model. Vet Dermatol. 2009;20(2):99-104.doi:10.1111/j.1365-3164.2008.00692.x

19175564

Chu

C-H.

Cheng

Y-P.

Chan

J-YL

. Alopecia areata after vaccination: recurrence with rechallenge. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33(3):e218-e219.doi:10.1111/pde.12849

27071855

10.

Scollan

ME.

Breneman

Kinariwalla

et al. Alopecia areata after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. JAAD Case Rep. 2022;20:1-5.doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.11.023

34931171

11.

Lee

CH.

Lee

W-S

. Comorbidities in alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(2):e16:466-477.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.013

30031145

12.

Okhovat

J-P.

Marks

DH.

Manatis-Lornell

Hagigeorges

Locascio

JJ.

Senna

. Association between alopecia areata, anxiety, and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.086 01 Jun 2019.31163237

13.

Bilgiç

Ö.

Bilgiç

Bahalı

Bahali

AG.

Gürkan

Yılmaz

. Psychiatric symptomatology and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with alopecia areata. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(11):1463-1468.doi:10.1111/jdv.12315

24237476

14.

Altunisik

Ucuz

Turkmen

. Psychiatric basics of alopecia areata in pediatric patients: evaluation of emotion dysregulation, somatization, depression, and anxiety levels. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(2):770-775.doi:10.1111/jocd.14122

33797195

15.

Katsarou-Katsari

Singh

LK.

Theoharides

. Alopecia areata and affected skin CRH receptor upregulation induced by acute emotional stress. Dermatology. 2001;203(2):157-161.doi:10.1159/000051732

11586016

16.

McDonald

KA.

Shelley

AJ.

Colantonio

Beecker

. Hair pull test: evidence-based update and revision of guidelines. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):472-477.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.10.002

28010890

17.

Chelidze

Lipner

. Nail changes in alopecia areata: an update and review. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57(7):776-783.doi:10.1111/ijd.13866

29318582

18.

Hegde

SP.

Naveen

KN.

Athanikar

SB.

Reshme

. Clinical and dermatoscopic patterns of alopecia areata: a tertiary care centre experience. Int J Trichology. 2013;5(3):132-136.doi:10.4103/0974-7753.125608

24574691

19.

Inui

Nakajima

Nakagawa

Itami

. Clinical significance of dermoscopy in alopecia areata: analysis of 300 cases. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47(7):688-693.doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03692.x

18613874

20.

Meah

Wall

York

et al. The alopecia areata consensus of experts (ACE) study: results of an international expert opinion on treatments for alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):123-130.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.004

32165196

21.

Waśkiel-Burnat

Rakowska

Sikora

Olszewska

Rudnicka

. Alopecia areata predictive score: a new trichoscopy-based tool to predict treatment outcome in patients with patchy alopecia areata. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(3):746-751.doi:10.1111/jocd.13064

31301100

22.

Meah

Wall

York

et al. The alopecia areata consensus of experts (ACE) study part II: results of an international expert opinion on diagnosis and laboratory evaluation for alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(6):1594-1601.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.028

32926985

23.

Olsen

EA.

Roberts

Sperling

et al. Objective outcome measures: collecting meaningful data on alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(3):470-478.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.048

29128463

24.

Olsen

Hordinsky

McDonald-Hull

et al. Alopecia areata investigational assessment guidelines. National alopecia areata Foundation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(2 Pt 1):242-246.doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70195-7

10025752

25.

Gudobba

Mane

Bayramova

et al. Automating hair loss labels for universally scoring alopecia from images: rethinking alopecia scores. JAMA Dermatol. 2022.doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.5415

26.

Wyrwich

KW.

Kitchen

Knight

et al. The alopecia areata investigator global assessment scale: a measure for evaluating clinically meaningful success in clinical trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(4):702-709.doi:10.1111/bjd.18883

31970750

27.

Wyrwich

KW.

Kitchen

Knight

et al. Development of clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) and patient-reported outcome (pro) measures for eyebrow, Eyelash and nail assessment in alopecia areata. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(5):725-732.doi:10.1007/s40257-020-00545-9

32803546

28.

Jang

YH.

Moon

SY.

Lee

et al. Alopecia areata progression index, a scoring system for evaluating overall hair loss activity in alopecia areata patients with pigmented hair: a development and reliability assessment. Dermatology. 2016;232(2):143-149.doi:10.1159/000442816

26757319

29.

Chernyshov

PV.

Tomas-Aragones

Finlay

et al. Quality of life measurement in alopecia areata. position statement of the European Academy of dermatology and venereology task force on quality of life and patient oriented outcomes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(8):1614-1621.doi:10.1111/jdv.17370

34107093

30.

Han

JJ.

Desai

et al. Placebo group regrowth rate in alopecia areata clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(2):389-390.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.12.009

34902493

31.

Messenger

AG.

Bleehen

. Alopecia areata: light and electron microscopic pathology of the regrowing white hair. Br J Dermatol. 1984;110(2):155-162.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1984.tb07461.x

6696834

32.

Daruwalla

SB.

Dhurat

RS.

Hamid

SAT

. All that a dermatotrichologist needs to know about hair camouflage: a comprehensive review. Int J Trichology. 2022;14(3):77-83.doi:10.4103/ijt.ijt_6_21

35755961

33.

García Castro

Domínguez Santás

Luna Bastante

Lobato Izagirre

Krasnovska Zayets

Feito-Rodríguez

. Painless, inexpensive and non-permanent tattoo sticker for the eyebrow alopecia in children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(3):699-700.doi:10.1111/pde.14546

33656196

34.

Marwah

MK.

Kerure

AS.

Marwah

. Microblading and the science behind it. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021;12(1):6-11.doi:10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_230_20

33768017

35.

Spurr

Hanna

Colantonio

. Cutaneous sarcoidosis in eyebrows cosmetically pigmented with microblading method: a case report and review of the literature. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2022;10:2050313X221117720.doi:10.1177/2050313X221117720

35991955

36.

Lahouel

Salah

NB.

Machghoul

Belhadjali

Youssef

Zili

. Allergic contact dermatitis post-microblading eyebrow tattooing: a manifestation of pre-existing nickel sensitization. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(10):5270-5271.doi:10.1111/jocd.14920

35290705

37.

Kluger

. Delayed granulomatous reaction after eyebrow Microblading. Dermatol Surg. 2022;48(4):472-473.doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003361

34935749

38.

Akoh

CC.

Akintilo

Shankar

Lo Sicco

. A rare case of microblading-induced preseptal cellulitis. JAAD Case Rep. 2021;16:98-100.doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.08.014

34553011

39.

Tkachenko

Okhovat

J-P.

Manjaly

Huang

KP.

Senna

MM.

Mostaghimi

. Complementary and alternative medicine for alopecia areata: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88(1):131-143.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.027

31870916

40.

Hay

IC.

Jamieson

Ormerod

. Randomized trial of aromatherapy. Successful treatment for alopecia areata. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134(11):1349-1352.doi:10.1001/archderm.134.11.1349

9828867

41.

Ozmen

Caliskan

Arca

Acikgoz

Koc

. Efficacy of aromatherapy in the treatment of localized alopecia areata: a double-blind placebo controlled study. Gulhane Medical Journal. 2015;57(3):233.doi:10.5455/gulhane.38258

42.

Hajheydari

Jamshidi

Akbari

Mohammadpour

. Combination of topical garlic gel and betamethasone valerate cream in the treatment of localized alopecia areata: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007;73(1):29-32.doi:10.4103/0378-6323.30648

17314444

43.

E P. Topical Garlic Concentrate for Alopecia Areata in Children. NCT02691117. 2023. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02691117?term=garlic&cond=Areata+Alopecia&draw=2&rank=1

44.

W-Z.

Zhang

F-R

. Glycyrrhizin combined with acitretin improve clinical symptom of psoriasis via reducing Th17 cell differentiation and related serum cytokine concentrations. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(9):16266-16272.26629143

45.

Yang

D-Q.

You

L-P.

Song

P-H.

Zhang

L-X.

Bai

Y-P

. A randomized controlled trial comparing total glucosides of paeony capsule and compound glycyrrhizin tablet for alopecia areata. Chin J Integr Med. 2012;18(8):621-625.doi:10.1007/s11655-012-1173-0

22855038

46.

Yang

Zheng

Zhang

Jin

Gan

Bai

. Total glucosides of paeony capsule plus compound glycyrrhizin tablets for the treatment of severe alopecia areata in children: a randomized controlled trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:1-5.doi:10.1155/2013/378219

24204391

47.

Thompson

JM.

Mirza

MA.

Park

MK.

Qureshi

AA.

Cho

. The role of micronutrients in alopecia areata: a review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18(5):663-679.doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0285-x

28508256

48.

Barton

VR.

Toussi

Awasthi

Kiuru

. Treatment of pediatric alopecia areata: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(6):1318-1334.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.077

33940103

49.

Sasmaz

Arican

. Comparison of azelaic acid and anthralin for the therapy of patchy alopecia areata: a pilot study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6(6):403-406.doi:10.2165/00128071-200506060-00007

16343028

50.

SZ.

Wang

Ratnaparkhi

Bergfeld

. Treatment of pediatric alopecia areata with anthralin: a retrospective study of 37 patients. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(6):817-820.doi:10.1111/pde.13703

30338548

51.

Herbst

Zöller

Kissling

Wenzel

Stutz

Freyschmidt-Paul

. Diphenylcyclopropenone treatment of alopecia areata induces apoptosis of perifollicular lymphocytes. Eur J Dermatol. 2006;16(5):537-542.17101475

52.

Lee

Kim

BJ.

Lee

YB.

Lee

W-S

. Hair regrowth outcomes of contact immunotherapy for patients with alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(10):1145-1151.doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2312

30073292

53.

Fukumoto

Magno

Oka

Nishigori

Horita

. Treatments for alopecia areata: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(3):e14916. doi:10.1111/dth.14916

33631058

54.

Waśkiel-Burnat

Kołodziejak

Sikora

et al. Therapeutic management in paediatric alopecia areata: a systematic review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(6):1299-1308.doi:10.1111/jdv.17187

33630354

55.

Charuwichitratana

Wattanakrai

Tanrattanakorn

. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in the treatment of alopecia areata with 0.25% desoximetasone cream. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(10):1276-1277.doi:10.1001/archderm.136.10.1276

11030789

56.

Lenane

Macarthur

Parkin

et al. Clobetasol propionate, 0.05%, vs hydrocortisone, 1%, for alopecia areata in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(1):47-50.doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5764

24226568

57.

Devi

Rashid

Ghafoor

. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide versus topical betamethasone valearate in the management of localized alopecia areata. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015;25(12):860-862.26691357

58.

Kuldeep

Singhal

Khare

AK.

Mittal

Gupta

LK.

Garg

. Randomized comparison of topical betamethasone valerate foam, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and tacrolimus ointment in management of localized alopecia areata. Int J Trichology. 2011;3(1):20-24.doi:10.4103/0974-7753.82123

21769231

59.

Ustuner

Balevi

Özdemir

. Best dilution of the best corticosteroid for intralesional injection in the treatment of localized alopecia areata in adults. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28(8):753-761.doi:10.1080/09546634.2017.1329497

28489468

60.

de Sousa

VB.

Arcanjo

FP.

Aguiar

et al. Intralesional betamethasone versus triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of localized alopecia areata: a within-patient randomized controlled trial. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(2):875-877.doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1788703

32594786

61.

Muhaidat

JM.

Al-Qarqaz

Khader

Alshiyab

DM.

Alkofahi

Almalekh

. A retrospective comparative study of two concentrations of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of patchy alopecia areata on the scalp. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020;13:795-803.doi:10.2147/CCID.S280855

33173320

62.

Arora

Bhalla

Thami

. Comparative efficacy of injection triamcinolone acetonide given intralesionally and through microneedling in Alopecia areata . Int J Trichology. 2022;14(5):156-161.doi:10.4103/ijt.ijt_140_20

36404886

63.

Shreberk-Hassidim

Ramot

Gilula

Zlotogorski

. A systematic review of pulse steroid therapy for alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(2):372-374.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.045

26775777

64.

Gallaga

NM.

Carrillo

Good

Munoz-Gonzalez

Ross

. Pediatric pulse dose corticosteroid therapy dosing and administration in the treatment of alopecia areata: a review of literature. Pediatr Dermatol. 2023;40(2):276-281.doi:10.1111/pde.15209

36461625

65.

Johnstone

MA.

Albert

. Prostaglandin-induced hair growth. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(Suppl 1):S185-202.doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00307-7

12204716

66.

Schlötzer-Schrehardt

Zenkel

Nüsing

. Expression and localization of FP and EP prostanoid receptor subtypes in human ocular tissues. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(5):1475-1487.11980863

67.

Coronel-Pérez

IM.

Rodríguez-Rey

EM.

Camacho-Martínez

. Latanoprost in the treatment of eyelash alopecia in alopecia areata universalis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(4):481-485.doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03543.x

20028444

68.

Bhat

Handa

. A randomized comparative study of the efficacy of topical latanoprost versus topical betamethasone diproprionate lotion in the treatment of localized alopecia areata. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2021;87(1):42-48.doi:10.25259/IJDVL_787_19

33580923

69.

Rafati

Mahmoudian

Golpour

Kazeminejad

Saeedi

Nekoukar

. The effect of latanoprost 0.005% solution in the management of scalp alopecia areata, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(6):e15450. doi:10.1111/dth.15450

35289043

70.

Ghassemi

Yazdanian

Behrangi

Jafari

Goodarzi

. Comparison of efficacy, safety and satisfaction of latanoprost versus minoxidil, betamethasone and in combination in patients with alopecia areata: a blinded multiple group randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(12):e15943. doi:10.1111/dth.15943

36257912

71.

Chiba

Kashiwagi

Ishijima

et al. A prospective study of iridial pigmentation and eyelash changes due to ophthalmic treatment with latanoprost. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2004;48(2):141-147.doi:10.1007/s10384-003-0039-6

15060793

72.

Borchert

Bruce

Wirta

et al. An evaluation of the safety and efficacy of bimatoprost for eyelash growth in pediatric subjects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:419-429.doi:10.2147/OPTH.S89561

27022239

73.

Ricar

Cetkovska

Hordinsky

Ricarova

. Topical bimatoprost in the treatment of eyelash loss in alopecia totalis and universalis: a prospective, open-label study. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(6):e15438. doi:10.1111/dth.15438

35278027

74.

Vila

TO.

Camacho Martinez

. Bimatoprost in the treatment of eyelash universalis alopecia areata. Int J Trichology. 2010;2(2):86-88.doi:10.4103/0974-7753.77511

21712909

75.

Zaher

Gawdat

HI.

Hegazy

RA.

Hassan

. Bimatoprost versus mometasone furoate in the treatment of scalp alopecia areata: a pilot study. Dermatology. 2015;230(4):308-313.doi:10.1159/000371416

25765294

76.

Homey

Assmann

Vohr

et al. Topical FK506 suppresses cytokine and costimulatory molecule expression in epidermal and local draining lymph node cells during primary skin immune responses. J Immunol. 1998;160(11):5331-5340.doi:10.4049/jimmunol.160.11.5331

9605132

77.

Nassar

Elradi

Radwan

Albalat

. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of topical tacrolimus 0.03% and topical calcipotriol 0.005% mixed with betamethasone dipropionate versus topical clobetasol 0.05% in treatment of alopecia areata: a clinical and trichoscopic study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022.

78.

Jung

KE.

Gye

JW.

Park

MK.

Park

. Comparison of the topical FK506 and clobetasol propionate as first-line therapy in the treatment of early alopecia areata. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56(12):1487-1488.doi:10.1111/ijd.13676

28703306

79.

Price

VH.

Willey

Chen

. Topical tacrolimus in alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52(1):138-139.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2004.05.019

15627095

80.

Xie

Komuves

Q-C

et al. Lack of the vitamin D receptor is associated with reduced epidermal differentiation and hair follicle growth. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118(1):11-16.doi:10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01644.x

11851870

81.

Nancy

A-L.

Yehuda

. Prediction and prevention of autoimmune skin disorders. Arch Dermatol Res. 2009;301(1):57-64.doi:10.1007/s00403-008-0889-3

18815800

82.

Narang

Daroach

Kumaran

. Efficacy and safety of topical calcipotriol in management of alopecia areata: a pilot study. Dermatol Ther. 2017;30(3)doi:10.1111/dth.12464 30 01 2017.28133875

83.

Çerman

AA.

Solak

SS.

Altunay

İlknur.

Küçükünal

. Topical calcipotriol therapy for mild-to-moderate alopecia areata: a retrospective study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14(6):616-620.26091388

84.

Gupta

Singh

Khan

. Comparative evaluation of efficacy between topical calcipotriol used along with topical clobetasol and topical clobetasol monotherapy in treatment of alopecia areata: a randomised clinical trial. Journal Of Clinical And Diagnostic Research. 2021:15.doi:10.7860/JCDR/2021/48438.14823

85.

Alam

Amin

SS.

Adil

Arif

Zahra

FT.

Varshney

. Comparative study of efficacy of topical mometasone with calcipotriol versus mometasone alone in the treatment of alopecia areata. Int J Trichology. 2019;11(3):123-127.doi:10.4103/ijt.ijt_18_19

31360041

86.

Rashad

AF.

Elgamal

Fouda

. Intralesional vitamin D3 in treatment of alopecia areata: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(10):4617-4622.doi:10.1111/jocd.14844

35152536

87.

Nowaczyk

Makowska

Rakowska

Sikora

Rudnicka

. Cyclosporine with and without systemic corticosteroids in treatment of alopecia areata: a systematic review. Dermatol Ther. 2020;10(3):387-399.doi:10.1007/s13555-020-00370-2

32270396

88.

Husein-ElAhmed

Steinhoff

. Efficacy and predictive factors of cyclosporine A in alopecia areata: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(3):1643-1651.doi:10.1080/09546634.2021.1886230

33555953

89.

Farshi

Mansouri

Safar

Khiabanloo

. Could azathioprine be considered as a therapeutic alternative in the treatment of alopecia areata? A pilot study. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(10):1188-1193.doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04576.x

20883409

90.

Gupta

Verma

KK.

Khandpur

Bhari

. Weekly azathioprine pulse versus betamethasone oral Mini-Pulse in the treatment of moderate-to-severe alopecia areata. Indian J Dermatol. 2019;64(4):292-298.doi:10.4103/ijd.IJD_481_16

31516138

91.

Bedoui

Guillot

Sélambarom

et al. Methotrexate an old drug with new tricks. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5023 doi:10.3390/ijms20205023

31658782

92.

Phan

Ramachandran

Sebaratnam

. Methotrexate for alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(1):120-127.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.064

30003990

93.

Phan

Lee

Fischer

. Methotrexate in the treatment of paediatric alopecia areata: retrospective case series and updated meta-analysis. Australas J Dermatol. 2020;61(2):119-124.doi:10.1111/ajd.13206

31802478

94.

Kinoshita-Ise

Sachdeva

Martinez-Cabriales

SA.

Shear

NH.

Lansang

. Oral methotrexate monotherapy for severe alopecia areata: a single center retrospective case series. J Cutan Med Surg. 2021;25(5):490-497.doi:10.1177/1203475421995712

33715460

95.

Xing

Dai

Jabbari

et al. Alopecia areata is driven by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and is reversed by JAK inhibition. Nat Med. 2014;20(9):1043-1049.doi:10.1038/nm.3645

25129481

96.

Phan

Sebaratnam

. JAK inhibitors for alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(5):850-856.doi:10.1111/jdv.15489

30762909

97.

Liu

LY.

King

. Response to tofacitinib therapy of eyebrows and eyelashes in alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1778-1779.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.037

30502414

98.

Castelo-Soccio

. Experience with oral tofacitinib in 8 adolescent patients with alopecia universalis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(4):754-755.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.038

28325392

99.

Craiglow

BG.

King

. Tofacitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata in preadolescent children. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(2):568-570.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.041

30195571

100.

Craiglow

BG.

Liu

LY.

King

. Tofacitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata and variants in adolescents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(1):29-32.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.09.006

27816292

101.

Dai

Y-X.

Chen

C-C

. Tofacitinib therapy for children with severe alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(4):1164-1166.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.041

30630026

102.

Jerjen

Meah

Trindade de Carvalho

Wall

Eisman

Sinclair

. Treatment of alopecia areata in pre-adolescent children with oral tofacitinib: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(1):103-108.doi:10.1111/pde.14422

33099833

103.

Kibbie

Kines

Norris

Dunnick

. Oral tofacitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata in pediatric patients. Pediatr Dermatol. 2022;39(1):31-34.doi:10.1111/pde.14855

34779041

104.

Guo

Feng

Sun

Jiang

Liu

. Benefit and risk profile of tofacitinib for the treatment of alopecia areata: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(1):192-201.doi:10.1111/jdv.15937

31494993

105.

Almutairi

Nour

TM.

Hussain

. Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of severe alopecia areata: an open-label comparative study. Dermatology. 2019;235(2):130-136.doi:10.1159/000494613

30566941

106.

Mollé

Krichevsky

Kermani

Silver

RT.

Ritchie

Scandura

. Ruxolitinib can cause weight gain by blocking leptin signaling in the brain via JAK2/STAT3. Blood. 2020;135(13):1062-1066.doi:10.1182/blood.2019003050

32047890

107.

Lai

VWY.

Bokhari

Sinclair

. Sublingual tofacitinib for alopecia areata: a roll-over pilot clinical trial and analysis of pharmacokinetics. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60(9):1135-1139.doi:10.1111/ijd.15657

34008179

108.

Olsen

EA.

Kornacki

Sun

Hordinsky

. Ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of patients with alopecia areata: a 2-part, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled phase 2 study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(2):412-419.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.10.016

31622643

109.

Bokhari

Sinclair

. Treatment of alopecia universalis with topical Janus kinase inhibitors - a double blind, placebo, and active controlled pilot study. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57(12):1464-1470.doi:10.1111/ijd.14192

30160787

110.

King

Ohyama

Kwon

et al. Two phase 3 trials of baricitinib for alopecia areata. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(18):1687-1699.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2110343

35334197

111.

King

Guttman-Yassky

Peeva

et al. A phase 2a randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase inhibitors ritlecitinib and brepocitinib in alopecia areata: 24-week results. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(2):379-387.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.050

33757798

112.

ClinicalTrials.gov . PF-06651600 for the treatment of alopecia areata (ALLEGRO-2b/3). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03732807?term=ritlecitinib+alopecia+areata&draw=2&rank=2

113.

. A. T. Long-term safety and efficacy of ritlecitinib in adults and adolescents with alopecia areata: interim results from the ALLEGRO-LT phase 3, open-label trial. D3T01.1G. presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Congress; 07–10 Sept 2022 2022; Milan, Italy.

114.

King

Mesinkovska

Mirmirani

et al. Phase 2 randomized, dose-ranging trial of CTP-543, a selective Janus Kinase inhibitor, in moderate-to-severe alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(2):306-313.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.03.045

35364216

115.

Messenger

AG.

Rundegren

. Minoxidil: mechanisms of action on hair growth. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150(2):186-194.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05785.x

14996087

116.

Sharma

AN.

Michelle

Juhasz

Muller Ramos

Atanaskova Mesinkovska

. Low-dose oral minoxidil as treatment for non-scarring alopecia: a systematic review. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59(8):1013-1019.doi:10.1111/ijd.14933

32516434

117.

Gupta

AK.

Talukder

Venkataraman

Bamimore

. Minoxidil: a comprehensive review. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(4):1896-1906.doi:10.1080/09546634.2021.1945527

34159872

118.

Dhurat

Daruwalla

Pai

et al. SULT1A1 (minoxidil sulfotransferase) enzyme booster significantly improves response to topical minoxidil for hair regrowth. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(1):343-346.doi:10.1111/jocd.14299

34133836

119.

Freire

PCB.

Riera

Martimbianco

ALC.

Petri

Atallah

. Minoxidil for patchy alopecia areata: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(9):1792-1799.doi:10.1111/jdv.15545

30835901

120.

Olsen

EA.

Dunlap

FE.

Funicella

et al. A randomized clinical trial of 5% topical minoxidil versus 2% topical minoxidil and placebo in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(3):377-385.doi:10.1067/mjd.2002.124088

12196747

121.

Lucky

AW.

Piacquadio

DJ.

Ditre

et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 5% and 2% topical minoxidil solutions in the treatment of female pattern hair loss. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(4):541-553.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2003.06.014

15034503

122.

Olsen

EA.

Whiting

Bergfeld

et al. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of a novel formulation of 5% minoxidil topical foam versus placebo in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(5):767-774.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.04.012

17761356

123.

Blume-Peytavi

Hillmann

Dietz

Canfield

Garcia Bartels

. A randomized, single-blind trial of 5% minoxidil foam once daily versus 2% minoxidil solution twice daily in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in women. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(6):1126-1134.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.09.724

21700360

124.

Friedman

ES.

Friedman

PM.

Cohen

DE.

Washenik

. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical minoxidil solution: etiology and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(2):309-312.doi:10.1067/mjd.2002.119104

11807448

125.

Jimenez-Cauhe

Saceda-Corralo

Rodrigues-Barata

et al. Safety of low-dose oral minoxidil treatment for hair loss. A systematic review and pooled-analysis of individual patient data. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e14106. doi:10.1111/dth.14106

32757405

126.

Wambier

CG.

Craiglow

BG.

King

. Combination tofacitinib and oral minoxidil treatment for severe alopecia areata. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(3):743-745.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.080

31499158

127.

John

JM.

Sinclair

. Systemic minoxidil for hair disorders in pediatric patients: a safety and tolerability review. Int J Dermatol. 2023;62(2):257-259.doi:10.1111/ijd.16373

35965281

128.

Sánchez-Díaz

López-Delgado

Montero-Vílchez

et al. Systemic minoxidil accidental exposure in a paediatric population: a case series study of cutaneous and systemic side effects. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18):4257.doi:10.3390/jcm10184257

34575367

129.

Bertolini

Zilio

Rossi

et al. Abnormal interactions between perifollicular mast cells and CD8+ T-cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of alopecia areata. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e94260. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094260

24832234

130.

Pham

Sung

Juhasz

et al. The role of antihistamines and Dupilumab in the management of alopecia areata: a systematic review. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(10):1070-1083.doi:10.36849/JDD.6553

36219058

131.

Gies

Bekaddour

Dieudonné

et al. Beyond anti-viral effects of Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1409. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01409

32714335

132.

Yun

Silverberg

NB.

Stein

. Alopecia areata treated with hydroxychloroquine: a retrospective study of nine pediatric cases. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(3):361-365.doi:10.1111/pde.13451

29575039

133.

Mikhaylov

Pavel

Yao

et al. A randomized placebo-controlled single-center pilot study of the safety and efficacy of apremilast in subjects with moderate-to-severe alopecia areata. Arch Dermatol Res. 2019;311(1):29-36.doi:10.1007/s00403-018-1876-y

30417279

134.

Cervantes

Jimenez

JJ.

DelCanto

GM.

Tosti

. Treatment of alopecia areata with Simvastatin/Ezetimibe. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2018;19(1):S25-S31.doi:10.1016/j.jisp.2017.10.013

29273101

135.

Lattouf

Jimenez

JJ.

Tosti

et al. Treatment of alopecia areata with simvastatin/ezetimibe. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(2):359-361.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.006

25592347

136.

Freitas Gouveia

Trüeb

. Unsuccessful treatment of alopecia areata with Simvastatin/Ezetimibe: experience in 12 patients. Skin Appendage Disord. 2017;3(3):156-160.doi:10.1159/000468991

28879192

137.

Loi

Starace

Piraccini

. Alopecia areata (AA) and treatment with simvastatin/ezetimibe: experience of 20 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(5):e99-e100.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.071

27085249

138.

Ikeda

. A new classification of alopecia areata. Dermatologica. 1965;131(6):421-445.doi:10.1159/000254503

5864736

139.

Guttman-Yassky

Renert-Yuval

Bares

et al. Phase 2A randomized clinical trial of dupilumab (anti-IL-4Ralpha) for alopecia areata patients. Allergy. 2022;77(3):897-906.doi:10.1111/all.15071

34460948

140.

McKenzie

PL.

Castelo-Soccio

. Dupilumab therapy for alopecia areata in pediatric patients with concomitant atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(6):1691-1694.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.01.046

33484763

141.

Guttman-Yassky

Nia

JK.

Hashim

et al. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab treatment in adults with extensive alopecia areata. Arch Dermatol Res. 2018;310(8):607-614.doi:10.1007/s00403-018-1853-5

30121698

142.

Meznerics

FA.

Illés

Dembrovszky

et al. Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia Areata-A steroid-free treatment modality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Biomedicines. 2022;10(8):1829. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10081829

36009377

143.

Trink

Sorbellini

Bezzola

et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, half-head study to evaluate the effects of platelet-rich plasma on alopecia areata. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(3):690-694.doi:10.1111/bjd.12397

23607773

144.

Hegde

Relhan

Sahoo

Garg

. A randomized, placebo and active controlled, split scalp study to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in patchy alopecia areata of the scalp. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e14388. doi:10.1111/dth.14388

33034942

145.

Zhang

Lin

et al. Laser and light therapy combined with topical minoxidil for alopecia areata: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2023;38(1):74. doi:10.1007/s10103-023-03734-0

36800063

146.

Bayramgürler

Demirsoy

EO.

Aktürk

AŞ.

Kıran

. Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy for alopecia areata. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2011;27(6):325-327.doi:10.1111/j.1600-0781.2011.00612.x

22092737

147.

El Taieb

MA.

Hegazy

EM.

Ibrahim

HM.

Osman

AB.

Abualhamd

. Topical calcipotriol vs narrowband ultraviolet B in treatment of alopecia areata: a randomized-controlled trial. Arch Dermatol Res. 2019;311(8):629-636.doi:10.1007/s00403-019-01943-8

31236672

148.

Jang

YH.

Eun

DH.

Kim

. Long-term prognosis of alopecia areata in children and adolescents. Ann Dermatol. 2019;31(2):231-234.doi:10.5021/ad.2019.31.2.231

33911578

149.

Tosti

Bellavista

Iorizzo

. Alopecia areata: a long term follow-up study of 191 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(3):438-441.doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.05.008

16908349

150.

Burroway

Griggs

Tosti

. Alopecia totalis and universalis long-term outcomes: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(4):709-715.doi:10.1111/jdv.15994

31593606

151.

Goh

Finkel

Christos

PJ.

Sinha

. Profile of 513 patients with alopecia areata: associations of disease subtypes with atopy, autoimmune disease and positive family history. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(9):1055-1060.doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01676.x

16987257