This article explores the potential benefits from an application of activity theory to music education research. In particular, the intention is to understand more clearly those possible, potential and actual interrelationships between the constituent elements that comprise the complex reality of the process of music education. Illustrations are provided from an example case study of new, unpublished research into the nature and impact of the introduction of female choristers into an all-male UK cathedral choir.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Avanzini, G., Faienza, C. , Minciacchi, D., Lopez, L., & Majno, M. (Eds.). (2003). The neurosciences and music . (Vol. 999). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
2.
Avanzini, G., Koelsch, S., Lopez, L., & Majno, M. (2005). The neurosciences and music II. (Vol. 1060). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
3.
Bannon, L. (1997). Activity Theory. Retrieved October 24, 2005, from http://www.sv.cict.fr/cotcos/pjs/TheoreticalApproaches/Actvity/ActivitypaperBannon.htm
4.
Barrett, M.S. (2005). Musical communication and children's communities of musical practice. In D. Miell, R. MacDonald, & D. J. Hargeaves (Ed.s). Musical Communication (pp. 261-280). New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BERA [British Educational Research Association] Music Education Review Group. (2001). Mapping Music Education Research in the UK. Southwell, UK: British Educational Research Association.
6.
Bresler, L. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of Research on Arts Education. Dordrecht, NL: Springer .
7.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Clarke, E. (2005). Ways of listening. New York : Oxford University Press.
9.
Cole. M. (1999). Cultural psychology: some general principles and a concrete example. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.). Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 87-106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Damasio, A. R., Harrington, A., Kagan, J., McEwen, B. S., Moss, H., & Shaikh, R. (Eds.). (2001). Unity of knowledge: The convergence of natural and human science (Vol. 935). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
11.
Daniels, H. (2004). Cultural Historical Activity Theory and Professional Learning. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51(2), 185-200.
12.
Davidson, J.W. (2004). The music practitioner: Research for the music performer, teacher and listener. London: Ashgate.
13.
Day, T. ( 2000). English cathedral choirs in the twentieth century. In J. Potter (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Singing (pp. 123-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1998). Strategies of qualitative enquiry. London: SAGE.
15.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation . In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.). Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
16.
Engeström, Y. (2001a). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. With a commentary by Michael Young. Learning Group, Occasional Paper No 1. London: Institute of Education.
17.
Engeström, Y. (2001b). Expansive Learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
18.
Engeström Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.). Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Green, L. (2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. London: Ashgate.
21.
Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. London: SAGE.
22.
Hargreaves, D. J., & North, A. C. (Eds.). (1997). The social psychology of music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
James, M. (2006, November 20-22). Making sense of TLRP. Presentation to the TLRP 2006 conference, Glasgow. Available from http://www.tlrp-archive.org/tlrp/upload/assets/1159958421_TLRP10principlesofLT.pdf
24.
Juslin, P., & Sloboda, J. (Eds.). (2001) Music and emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MacDonald, R., Hargreaves, D. J., & Miell, D. (Eds.). (2002). Musical identities. New York : Oxford University Press.
27.
Miell, D., MacDonald, R. , & Hargreaves, D. J. (Eds.). (2005). Musical communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. (Eds.). (2003). The cognitive neuroscience of music. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
30.
Ryder, M. (2005) What is activity theory? Retrieved October 24, 2005, from http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/act_dff.html
31.
Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening . Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
32.
Small, C. (1999). Musicking — the meanings of performing and listening. A lecture. Music Education Research, 1(1), 9-21.
33.
Stewart, C. (2006). Investigating female cathedral choristers. Presentation to the Cathedral Organists Association, November 8, St, Paul's Cathedral, London.
34.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1976). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller .
35.
Welch, G.F. (1985). A schema theory of how children learn to sing in-tune. Psychology of Music. 13(1), 3-18.
36.
Welch, G.F. (1998). Early childhood musical development. Research Studies in Music Education, 11, 27-41.
37.
Welch, G.F. (2000a). The ontogenesis of musical behaviour: A sociological perspective. Research Studies in Music Education, 14, 1-13.
38.
Welch, G.F. (2000b). Pedagogy and research in Anglophone countries . Quaderni della Societa Italiana per l'Educazione Musicale , 16, 439-444.
39.
Welch, G.F. (2002). Early childhood musical development. In L. Bresler & C. Thompson (Eds.), The Arts in Children's Lives: Context, Culture and Curriculum (pp. 113-128). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
40.
Welch, G.F. (2004, October 7-9). Developing young professional female singers in UK cathedrals. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Physiology and Acoustics of Singing. Denver: National Center for Voice and Speech . Available from http://www.ncvs.org/pas/2004/pres/welch/welch.htm
41.
Welch, G.F. (2005). Singing as communication. In D. Miell, R. MacDonald & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical Communication (pp. 239-259). New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Welch, G.F. (2006). The musical development and education of young children. In B. Spodek & O. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children (pp.251-267). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Welch, G.F. (in preparation). Culture and gender in a cathedral music context: An activity theory exploration. In M. S. Barrett (Ed.), A Cultural Psychology of Music Education. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Welch, G.F., & Adams, P. (2003). How is music learning celebrated and developed? [BERA Professional User Research Review]. Southwell, Notts: British Educational Research Association.
45.
Welch, G. F., & Hallam, S. (Eds.). (2004). Mapping music education research — international perspectives. Psychology of Music, 32(3), 235-367. [Special Issue].
46.
Welch, G.F., & Howard, D.M. (2002). Gendered Voice in the Cathedral Choir. Psychology of Music, 30, 102-120.
