This study investigates the realistic conditions of ‘digital Korea’, especially as they are exemplified by the Samsung SDI scandal in South Korea. Samsung SDI, the world's largest plasma TV maker and a subsidiary of the Samsung Group, has fallen under suspicion due to using illegally cloned mobile phones to track the location data of some activist workers who tried to organise a union. The study stresses that this example of mobile tracking represents the shady side of mobile phone use created by management's excessive desire for labour control, and confirms that mobile tracking techniques make possible the spatial expansion of the scope of power. The spatial vocabulary of power is not totalitarian, but dispersed and nomadic in action, and resides in the space of ‘flows’ constructed by electronic impulses. This study discloses that, for private corporations, mobile tracking facilitates a form of efficient, invisible labour control over ‘targeted’ workers, even outside the workplace. It concludes that the control of labourers in Korea has been reinforced by the confluence of business interests, the under-developed political system and a societal lack of interest in privacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbasR.MichaelK.MichaelM.G.AloudatA.2009, ‘The Current State of Commercial Location-Based Service Offerings in Australia’, paper presented to the Eighth International Conference on Mobile Business, Dalian, China, IEEE Computer Society, http://works.bepress.com/kmichael/124.
2.
American Management Association (AMA)2007, Workplace Monitoring and Surveillance: Policies and Practices, AMA, New York.
3.
AndrejevicM.2003, ‘Monitored Mobility in the Era of Mass Customisation’, Space & Culture, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 132–50.
4.
BenigerJ.1986, The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
5.
BittmanM.BrownJ.E.WajcmanJ.2009, ‘The Mobile Phone, Perpetual Contact and Time Pressure’, Work, Employment & Society, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 673–91.
6.
BixlerL.2010, ‘Korea's Electronics Scandal’, Ms Magazine, Fall, pp. 20–21.
7.
Body-GendrotS.2000, The Social Control of Cities? A Comparative Perspective, Blackwell, Oxford.
8.
BronittS.StelliosJ.2006, ‘Regulating Telecommunications Interception and Access: A Seachange in Surveillance Laws’, in MichaelK.MichaelM.G. (eds), The Social Implications of Information Security Measures on Citizens and Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, pp. 119–54, http://works.bepress.com/kmichael/50.
9.
CastellsM.1985, ‘High Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process in the United States’, in CastellsM. (ed.), High Technology, Space, and Society, Sage, London, pp. 11–40.
10.
CastellsM.1996, The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, Oxford.
11.
ChoeS.-H.2007, ‘Drinkers in Korea Dial for Designated Drivers’, The New York Times, 10 July.
12.
ChoeS.-H.2010, ‘Book on Samsung Divides Korea’, The New York Times, 25 April.
13.
CrandallJ.2010, ‘The Geospatialization of Calculative Operations: Tracking, Sensing and Megacities’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 68–90.
14.
DavisM.1990, City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, Verso, London.
15.
DobsonJ.E.FisherP.F.2003, ‘Geoslavery’, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Spring, pp. 47–52.
ElliottA.UrryJ.2010, Mobile Lives, Routledge, London.
18.
ElmerG.2004, Profiling Machines: Mapping the Personal Information Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19.
Evans-CowleyJ.2010, ‘Planning in the Real-Time City: The Future of Mobile Technology’, Journal of Planning Literature, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 136–49.
20.
FabijancicT.1995, ‘The Dialectics of Modernity: Reification, Space, and Vision’, Rethinking Marxism, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 90–108.
21.
FoucaultM.1977, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Vintage, New York.
22.
FoucaultM.1980, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. GoldenC., Pantheon, New York.
23.
FuscoS.MichaelK.AloudatA.AbbasR.2011, ‘Monitoring People Using Location-Based Social Networking and Its Negative Impact on Trust: An Exploratory Contextual Analysis of Five Types of “Friend” Relationship’, in MillerKeith (ed.), IEEE Symposium on Technology and Society 2011 (ISTAS11)IEEE, Illinois, Chicago, IL, http://works.bepress.com/kmichael/209.
24.
FuscoS.MichaelK.MichaelM.G.2010, ‘Using a Social Informatics Framework to Study the Effects of Location-Based Social Networking on Relationships Between People: A Review of Literature’, in MichaelKatina (ed.), IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS10), IEEE, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, http://works.bepress.com/kmichael/189.
25.
GogginG.2009, ‘Adapting the Mobile Phone: The iPhone and Its Consumption’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 231–44.
26.
GrahamS.1999, ‘Geographies of Surveillant Simulation’, in CrangM.CrangP.MayJ. (eds), Virtual Geographies: Bodies, Space and Relations, Routledge, London, pp. 131–48.
27.
GreenbaumJ.2004, Windows on the Workplace: Technology, Jobs, and the Organisation of Office Work, Monthly Review Press, New York.
28.
HarveyD.1989, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
29.
HeadS.2003, The New Ruthless Economy: Work and Power in the Digital Age, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30.
HerbertA.W.2010, ‘Workplace Consequences of Electronic Exhibitionism and Voyeurism’, paper presented to IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, http://works.bepress.com/william_herbert/16.
31.
Joint Committees for Fact-Finding and Management Accountability Regarding Surveillance of Samsung Workers2005, ‘Press Conference Report’, 16 February, www.jinbo.net.
KumarK.2004 [1995], ‘Excerpt from Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society’, in WebsterF. (ed.), The Information Society Reader, Routledge, London, pp. 103–24.
36.
LeeK-S.2008, ‘Samsung Corporation’, in DonsbachW. (ed.), The International Encyclopaedia of Communication: International Communication Vol X, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 4459–61.
37.
MichaelM.G.MichaelK.2010, ‘Towards a State of Überveillance’, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 9–16.
38.
MoonI.-W.2008, ‘Samsung Under Siege’, BusinessWeek, 17 April.
39.
NegriA.1988, ‘Archaeology and Project: The Mass Worker and the Social Worker’, in Revolution Retrieved: Selected Writings on Marx, Keynes, Capitalist Crisis and New Social Subjects, Red Notes, London, pp. 203–28.
40.
OhY-H.2004, ‘Prosecution Probes Alleged Tracking of Samsung Workers’, Korean Herald, 11 August, www.koreaherald.co.kr.
41.
ParkB-S.2004, ‘Dirty Pressures’, Sisa Magazine 2580, vol. 502, video clip, MBC Broadcasting, Seoul, www.imbc.com.
42.
RoseF.2005, ‘Seoul Machine: How Samsung Made Korea a Consumer Electronics Superpower’, Wired, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 126–31.
43.
SojaE.W.1996, Thirdspace: Journey to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places, Blackwell, Oxford.
44.
UrryJ.2000, ‘Mobile Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 185–203.
45.
UrryJ.2007, Mobilities, Polity Press, Cambridge.
46.
WallisC.2011, ‘Mobile Phones Without Guarantees: The Promises of Technology and the Contingencies of Culture’, New Media & Society, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–15.
47.
ZuboffS.1988, In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power, Basic Books, New York.
