Procreative Mothers (Sexual Difference) and Child-Free Sisters (Gender)

Abstract

The article considers the changing position of women and the family from the Second World War until today using the UK as its example. It offers a theoretical perspective by setting out to examine the possibility that the rise of second-wave feminism both reflected and spearheaded an aspect of demographic transition to non-replacement populations. It considers the tension between the formation of ‘sexual difference’ to enable reproduction and what it calls the ‘engendering of gender’ in lateral relations which are indifferent to procreation. With the achievements of feminism as a political vanguard and the demographic transition as its socioeconomic base, women were no longer defined by the family; their definition ceased to depend on procreation. The article proposes that the new use of the term ‘gender’ entered the political arena to become a key concept of feminism to indicate non-procreative sexuality and sexual relations that need not be heterosexual or biologically procreative. Judith Butler’s well-known suggestion that ‘gender’ troubles the status quo in a revolutionary manner cannot be sustained. Rather than disturbing the universe, the advent of ‘gender’ reflects the transition to a new demographic order.

Keywords

demographic change feminism fertility gender sexual difference

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banks, J.A. and O. Banks (1964) Feminism and Family Planning in Victorian England. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press .

Butler, J. (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Inversion of Identity, 10th Amnesty rev. edn. Routledge, London . (Orig. pub. 1992.)

Butler, J. and J. Scott (2003) Feminists Theorize the Political, rev. edn. London: Routledge . (Orig. pub. 1992.)

Chodorow, N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press .

De Beauvoir, S. (1947) Le Deuxième Sexe. Paris: Gallimard . (English edn, The Second Sex, New York: Knopf , 1952.)

Firestone, S. (1971) The Dialectics of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. London: Jonathan Cape .

Friedan, F. (1964) The Feminine Mystique. Harmondsworth: Penguin .

Hoare, Quintin (1967) ‘On Women: The Longest Revolution’ , New Left Review 41 (Jan./Feb.): 78–81 .

Kiernan, K. , J. Lewis and H. Land (1998) Lone Motherhood in Twentieth-Century Britain: From Footnote to Front Page. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

10.

Mitchell, J. (2003) Siblings: Sex and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press .

11.

Mitchell, J. and A. Oakley (1986) What is Feminism? Oxford: Blackwell .

12.

Pateman, C. (1990) The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press .

13.

Rowbotham, S. (1977) Hidden from History: 300 Years of Women’s Oppression and the Fight Against It. London: Pluto Press .

14.

Scott, J. (1996) ‘Gender as a Category of Analysis’, Feminism and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

15.

Seccombe W. (1995) Weathering the Storm: Working-Class Families from the Industrial Revolution to the Fertility Decline. London: Verso .

16.

Steedman, C. (1987) Landscape of a Good Woman. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press .

17.

Strathern, M. (2000) Talk to ‘Women Education Study Day’ conference, Gender Studies, University of Cambridge, 25 November.

18.

Swindells, J. and L. Jardine (1990) What’s Left? Women in Culture and the Labour Movement. London and New York: Routledge .

19.

Szreter, S. (1996) Fertility, Class and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940, Cambridge Studies in Population, Economy and Society in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .