This article analyses the micro dynamics of agency represented in the life story of a Mexican right-wing female politician — particularly how agency manifests itself in the way she repeats the rhetorical structures of her party’s discourse. Although claiming to be a modern woman, a high ranking political participant, she repeatedly refers to the traditional ideal of motherhood that also figures prominently in the right-wing party to which she belongs. Still, at some point, she goes beyond merely repeating the dominant discourse in constructing her own political subjectivity. In tracking her life story, the micro dynamics of her agency are explored through text and discourse analysis in which intertextuality and intersectionality of gender are instrumental. An attempt is made to overcome framing agency in the dichotomy between compliance and resistance. In doing so, the article also engages in recent debate on agency in European Journal of Women’s Studies.
Aalten A. ( 1995) Onvoltooid zelfbeeld: Enkele opmerkingen over het gebruik van levensverhalen van jonge mensen. Comenius15(3): 318-334.
2.
Appiah K. ( 1994) Identity, authenticity, survival: Multicultural societies and social reproduction. In: Gutmann A (ed.) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 149-163.
3.
Bacchetta P. and Power M. ( 2002) Introduction. In: Bacchetta P and Power M (eds) Right-Wing Women: From Conservatives to Extremists Around the World. London and New York: Routledge , 1-15.
4.
Bakhtin M. ( 1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin , ed. Holquist M, trans. Emerson C and Holquist M. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
Barrera DB ( 1994) Ser Panista: Mujeres de las colonias populares de ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua. In: Massolo A (ed.) Los Medios y los Modos, Particpación Política y Acción Colectiva de las Mujeres. México DF: El Colegio de México, 81-118.
6.
Bedi T. ( 2006) Feminist theory and the right-wing: Shiv Sena women mobilize Mumbai. Journal of International Women’s Studies7(4): 51-68.
7.
Berger Gluck S and Patai D (eds) (1991) Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. London: Routledge.
8.
Billig M. ( 1991) Ideology and Opinions: Studies Rhetorical Psychology. London, Newbury Park, CA and New Delhi: Sage.
9.
Brading DA ( 2001) Mexican Phoenix, Our Lady of Guadalupe: Image and Tradition across Five Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Buitelaar M. ( 2006) ‘I am the ultimate challenge’: Accounts of intersectionality in the life-story of a well-known daughter of Moroccan migrant workers in the Netherlands. European Journal of Women’s Studies13(3): 259-276.
11.
Butler J. ( 1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity . New York and London: Routledge .
12.
Chaney EM ( 1979) Supermadre: Women in Politics in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.
13.
Craske N. ( 2005) Ambiguities and ambivalences in making the nation: Women and politics in 20thcentury Mexico. Feminist Review79: 116-133.
14.
Cypess SM ( 1991) La Malinche in Mexican Literature: From History to Myth . Austin: University of Texas Press .
15.
Davids T. ( 1993) Identidad femenina representación política: Algunas consideraciones teóricas. In: Tarrés ML (ed.) La Voluntad de Ser: Mujeres en los Noventa. México, DF: El Colegio de México, 213-241.
16.
Davids T. ( 2005) Political representation and the ambiguity of Mexican motherhood. In: Davids T and Van Driel F (eds) The Gender Question in Globalization: Changing Perspectives and Practices. Aldershot: Ashgate, 179-197.
17.
Derrida J. ( 1972) La mythologie blanche: La métaphore dans le texte philosophique. In: Marges de la Philosophie. Paris: Minuit, 247-324.
18.
Duits L. and Van Zoonen L. ( 2006) Headscarves and porno-chic: Disciplining girls’ bodies in the multicultural society. European Journal of Women’s Studies13(2): 103-117.
19.
Duits L. and Van Zoonen L. ( 2007) Who’s afraid of female agency? A rejoinder to Gill . European Journal of Women’s Studies14(2): 161-170.
20.
Ewing K. ( 1990) The illusion of wholeness: Culture, self, and the experience of inconsistency. Ethos18(1): 251-278.
21.
Fairclough N. ( 2007) Discourse and Social Change, reprinted edn. Cambridge and Oxford: Polity.
22.
Foucault M. ( 1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York : Pantheon Books.
23.
Gill RC ( 2007) Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and ‘choice’ for feminism. A reply to Duits and Van Zoonen. European Journal of Women’s Studies14(1): 69-80.
24.
Goetz AM ( 2007) Women as the new anti-corruption force? Development and Change38(1): 87-105.
25.
Hall S. ( 1991) Ethnicity: Identity and difference. Radical America23(4): 9-20.
26.
Holland D., Lachicotte W. Jr, Skinner D. and Cain C. ( 1998) Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Josselson R. ( 1995) Imagining the real: Empathy, narrative and the dialogic self. In: Josselson R and Lieblich A (eds) Interpreting Experience: The Narrative Study of Lives 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 27-44.
28.
Kosta P. ( 2002) The concept of subjectivity in language. Universität Potsdam Institut für Salvistik, Belegarbeit Proseminar Unpersönliche Konstruktionen, Reflexivität/Reziprozität und Diathese im Slavischen , Wintersemester 2002/2003 vorbereitet von Olga Wolter , Matrikelnummer719120.
29.
McAdams D. ( 1993) The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York: William Morrow .
30.
McNay L. ( 2000) Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press/Blackwell .
31.
Mahmood S. ( 2005) Politics of Piety. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Massolo A. ( 1994) Introducción. Política y mujeres: una peculiar relación. In: Massolo A (ed.) Los Medios y los Modos, Particpación Política y Acción Colectiva de las Mujeres. México DF: El Colegio de México, 13-40.
33.
Meijer M. ( 1996) In Tekst Gevat. Inleiding tot een kritiek van representatie . Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
34.
Melhuus M. ( 1996) Power, value and the ambiguous meanings of gender. In: Melhuus M and Stølen KA (eds) Machos, Mistresses, Madonnas: Contesting the Power of Latin American Gender Imagery. London and New York: Verso, 207-230.
35.
Ortner S. ( 2006) Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture Power and the Acting Subject. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
36.
Power M. ( 2004) More than mere pawns: Right-wing women in Chile. Journal of Women’s History16(3): 138-151.
37.
Rodríguez V. ( 2003) Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
38.
Tuñon JP ( 1991) Women in Mexico: A Past Unveiled. Austin: University of Texas Press.
39.
Venegas LA ( 1994) Mujeres en la Militancia Blanquiazul. In: Massolo A (ed.) Los Medios y los Modos: Particpación Política y Acción Colectiva de las Mujeres. México DF: El Colegio de México, 45-78.
40.
Weedon C. ( 1987) Feminist Practise and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell .
41.
Willemse K. ( 2007) One Foot in Heaven: Narratives on Gender and Islam in Darfur, West-Sudan. Leiden: Brill .
