Developments in organization studies downplay the role of bureaucracy in favour of more flexible arrangements and forms of organizational control, including socio-ideological control. Corporate culture and regulated social identities are assumed to provide means for the integration and orchestration of work. Knowledge-intensive firms, which typically draw heavily upon socio-ideological modes of control, are often singled out as organizational forms that use social identity and the corporatization of the self as a mode for managerial control. In this article we explore and discuss social identity and identification in a large IT/management consultancy firm with a strong presence of socioideological or normative control, but also with strong bureaucratic features. Structural forms of control—formal HRM procedures and performance pressures are considered in relation to socio-ideological control. We identify organizational and individual consequences of identification in a context of social, structural, and cultural ‘closures’ and contradictions, including the tendency to create an ‘iron cage of subjectivity’.
Albert, S. and Whetten, D. A. (1985) ‘Organizational Identity’, in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds) Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 7, pp. 263–295. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
2.
Alvesson, M. (1990) ‘Organization: From Substance to Image?’ , Organization Studies11: 373–394 .
3.
Alvesson, M. (1995) Management of Knowledge-intensive Companies. Berlin: de Gruyter .
4.
Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2000) Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage .
5.
Alvesson, M. and K®arreman, D. (2000) ‘Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations Through Discourse Analysis’ , Human Relations53(9): 1125–1150 .
6.
Alvesson, M. and K®arreman, D. (2001a) ‘The Perfection or Meritocracy or Ritual of Bureaucracy? HRM in a Management Consultancy Company’ , paper presented at 2nd International Conference on Critical Management Studies, Manchester, July.
7.
Alvesson, M. and K®arreman, D. (2001b) ‘Interfaces of Control. Technocratic and Socio-ideological Control in a Management Consultancy Firm’ , paper presented at Conference on Information Flows in Knowledge-intensive Firms, Bocconi University, Milan, November.
8.
Alvesson, M. and Sk ®oldberg, K. (2000) Reflexive Methodology. London: Sage .
9.
Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (1996) Making Sense of Management. London: Sage .
10.
Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (2002) ‘Identity Regulation as Organizational Control’ , Journal of Management Studies39(5): 619–644 .
11.
Academy of Management Review(2000) Vol. 25, Special Topic Forum on Organizational Identity and Identification, eds S. Albert , B. Ashforth and J. Dutton , pp. 10–140.
12.
Ashforth, B. and Mael, F. (1989) ‘Social Identity Theory and the Organization’ , Academy of Management Review14: 20–39 .
13.
Barker, J. (1993) ‘Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-managing Teams’ , Administrative Science Quarterly38: 408–437 .
14.
Barley, S. and Kunda, G. (2001) ‘Bringing Work Back In’ , Organization Science12: 76–95 .
15.
Christensen, L. T. (1995) ‘Buffering Organizational Identity in the Marketing Culture’ , Organization Studies16(4): 651–672 .
16.
Courpasson, D. (2000) ‘Managerial Strategies of Domination: Power in Soft Bureaucracies’ , Organization Studies21: 141–161 .
17.
Czarniawska, B. (1997) Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
18.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1988) Ideological Control in Nonideological Organizations. New York: Praeger .
19.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1992) Exploring Complex Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
20.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1994) ‘Narratives of Individual and Organizational Identities’, Communication Yearbook, Vol. 17, ed. S. Deetz . Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
21.
Deetz, S. (1992) Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization: Developments in Communication and the Politics of Everyday Life. Albany, NY: SUNY Press .
22.
Dingwall, R. (1997) ‘Accounts, Interviews and Observations’, in G. Miller and R. Dingwall (eds) Context and Method in Qualitative Research, pp. 51–65. London: Sage .
23.
Dutton, J. , Dukerich, J. and Harquail, C. (1994) ‘Organizational Images and Member Identification’ , Administrative Science Quarterly39: 239–263 .
24.
Etzioni, A. (1964) Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
25.
Fombrun, C. (1986) ‘Structural Dynamics Within and Between Organizations’ , Administrative Science Quarterly31: 403–421 .
26.
Fournier, V. (1998) ‘Stories of Development and Exploitation: Militant Voices in Enterprise Culture’ , Organization1: 55–80 .
27.
Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K. (1991) ‘Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation’ , Strategic Management Journal12: 431–448 .
28.
Gioia, D. A. et al. (1994) ‘Symbolism and Strategic Change in Academia: The Dynamics of Sensemaking and Influence’ , Organization Science5: 363–383 .
29.
Grant, D. , Keenoy, T. and Oswick, C. (1998) ‘Organizational Discourse: Of Diversity, Dichotomy and Multi-disciplinarity’, in D. Grant , T. Keenoy and C. Oswick (eds) Discourse and Organization. London: Sage .
30.
Grey, C. (1994) ‘Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline’ , Sociology28: 479–497 .
31.
Hogg, M. A. and Terry, D. J. (2000) ‘Social Identity and Self-categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts’ , Academy of Management Review25: 121–140 .
32.
Jackall, R. (1988) Moral Mazes. New York: Oxford University Press .
33.
Keenoy, T. , Oswick, C. and Grant, D. (1997) ‘Organizational Discourses: Text and Context’ , Organization2: 147–157 .
34.
Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (1985) ‘Power and Identity in Theory and Practice’ , The Sociological Review33: 22–46 .
35.
Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (1989) ‘Power and Subjectivity at Work’ , Sociology23(4): 535–558 .
36.
Kunda, G. (1992) Engineering Culture. Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
37.
K®arreman, D. and Alvesson, M. (2001) ‘Making Newsmakers: Conversational Identities at Work’ , Organization Studies22: 59–90 .
38.
MacIntyre, A. (1984) After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press .
39.
Martin, J. (1992) Culture in Organizations: Three Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
40.
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony’ , American Journal of Sociology83: 340–363 .
41.
Mintzberg, H. (1983) Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
42.
Mintzberg, H. (1989) Mintzberg on Management. New York: The Free Press .
43.
Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
44.
Mumby, D. (1988) Communication and Power in Organizations: Discourse, Ideology and Domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
45.
Ouchi, W. G. (1979) ‘A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms’ , Management Science25: 833–848 .
46.
Pratt, M. G. (2000) ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ambivalent: Managing Identification Among Amway Distributors’ , Administrative Science Quarterly45(3): 456–493 .
47.
Pratt, M. G. and Foreman, P. O. (2000) ‘Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities’ , Academy of Management Review25: 18–142 .
48.
Smircich, L. and Morgan, G. (1982) ‘Leadership: The Management of Meaning’ , Journal of Applied Behavioral Science18: 257–273 .
49.
Van Maanen, J. and Kunda, G. (1989) ‘Real Feelings: Emotional Expression and Organizational Culture’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds) Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 11. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
50.
Wright, P. (1996) Managerial Leadership. London: Routledge .
51.
Weick, K. E. (1995) Sense-Making in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
