In developing our understandings of resistance, both organization theorists and feminist theorists have struggled with issues of the subject and object of resistance. In particular, attention has been focussed on an adequate theorizing of resistance that can offer a detailed and varied understanding of the different motivations of individuals and groups to transform dominant norms. This article draws on the tensions and debates within feminist theory, to argue that feminist theory problematizes but ultimately enriches and revitalizes conceptualizations of resistance within organization studies. The article focuses on three tensions within resistance studies, namely the subject of resistance, what ‘counts’ as resistance, and when resistance counts. The article illustrates how feminist theory has worked through these tensions in maintaining a practical politics of change and transformation whilst avoiding the problems of universalism, essentialism and privilege. Feminism, in attending to these tensions, offers a contingent politics of constant vigilance within power relations.
Acker, J. (1990) ‘Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations’ , Gender and Society4: 139-158 .
2.
Ackroyd, S. and Thompson, P. (1999) Organizational Misbehaviour. London: Sage .
3.
Alvesson, M. (2003) ‘Beyond Neo-Positivists, Romantics and Localists—A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research’ , Academy of Management Review28(1): 13-33 .
4.
Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (1996) Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage .
5.
Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (2002) ‘Identity Regulation as Organizational ontrol: Producing the Appropriate Individual’ , Journal of Management Studies39(5): 619-644 .
6.
Ball, K. (2004) ‘Gendering New Managerialism’, in R. Thomas , A. Mills and J. Helms Mills (eds) Identity Politics at Work: Resisting Gender, Gendering Resistance. London: Routledge .
7.
Bhabha, H. (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge .
8.
Brewis, J. (2004) ‘Refusing to be “Me”’, in R. Thomas , A. Mills and J. Helms Mills (eds) Identity Politics at Work: Resisting Gender, Gendering Resistance. London: Routledge .
9.
Brewis, J. and Linstead, S. (2004) ‘Gender and Management’, in S. Linstead , L. Fulop and S. Lilley (eds) Management and Organization: A Critical Text. London: Palgrave .
10.
Brooks, A. (1997) Postfeminisms: Feminism, Cultural Theory and Cultural Forms. London: Routledge .
11.
Brown, W. (1995) ‘Wounded Attachments: Late Modern Oppositional Political Formations’, in J. Rajchman (ed.) The Identity in Question. New York: Routledge .
12.
Butler, J. (1992) ‘Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism”’, in J. Butler and J. W. Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political. London: Routledge .
13.
Calás, M. and Smircich, L. (1996) ‘From the Women’s Point of View: Feminist Approaches to Organization Studies’, in S. Clegg , C. Hardy and A. Nords (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage .
14.
Causer, G. and Exworthy, M. (1999) ‘Professionals as Managers Across the Public Sector’, in M. Exworthy and S. Halford (eds) Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press .
15.
Cavendish, R. (1982) Women on the Line. London: Routledge .
16.
Collinson, D. (1994) ‘Strategies of Resistance: Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Workplace’, in J. M. Jermier , D. Knights and W. R. Nord (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations, pp. 219-251. London: Routledge .
17.
Collinson, D. and Collinson, M. (1997) ‘Delayering Managers: Time-Space Surveillance and its Gendered Effects’ , Organization4(3): 375-407 .
18.
Davies, A. and Thomas, R. (2002) ‘Gendering and Gender in Public Service Organisations’ , Public Management Review4(4): 461-484 .
19.
Davies, A. and Thomas, R. (2003) ‘Talking COP: Discourses of Change and Policing Identities’ , Public Administration81(4): 681-699 .
20.
Davies, A. , Meriläinen, S. , Thomas, R. and Tienari, J. (2004) ‘In Praise of “Un-common” Sense: Methodological (Epistemological, and Ontological) Considerations in Cross-Cultural Discursive Approaches to Organisational Analysis’ , paper presented at the Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, June 2004.
21.
de Certeau, M. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
22.
de Lauretis, T. (1988) ‘Displacing Hegemonic Discourses: Reflections on Feminist Theory in the 1980s’ , Inscriptions3(4): 27-145 .
23.
Dent, E. B. and Goldberg, S. G. (1999) ‘Challenging “Resistance to Change”’ , Journal of Applied Behavioural Science35: 25-41 .
24.
Dick, P. and Cassell, C. (2002) ‘Barriers to Managing Diversity in a UK Police Constabulary: The Role of Discourse’ , Journal of Management Studies39(7): 935-976 .
25.
di Stefano, C. (1990) ‘Dilemmas of Difference: Feminism, Modernity and Postmodernism’, in L. J. Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge .
26.
Dick, P. (2004) ‘Resistance to Diversity Initiatives’, in R. Thomas , A. J. Mills and J. Helms Mills (eds) Identity Politics at Work: Resisting Gender, Gendering Resistance. London: Routledge .
27.
Dominelli, L. (1996) ‘Deprofessionalising Social Work: Anti-oppressive Practice, Competencies and Postmodernism’ , British Journal of Social Work26(2): 153-175 .
28.
du Gay, P (1996) Consumption and Identity at Work. London: Sage .
29.
Exworthy, M. and Halford, S. (1999) ‘Professionals and Managers in a Changing Public Sector: Conflict, Compromise and Collaboration?’, in M. Exworthy and S. Halford (eds) Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press .
30.
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (1998) ‘Accounting for Teamwork: A Critical Study of Group-Based Systems of Organizational Control’ , Administrative Science Quarterly43: 358-396 .
31.
Fairclough, N. (1997) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd edn.London: Longman .
32.
Faith, K. (1994) ‘Resistance: Lessons from Foucault and Feminism’, in H. L. Radtke and H. J. Stam (eds) Power/Gender: Social Relations in Theory and Practice. London: Sage .
33.
Farnham, D. and Horton, S. (1996) Managing People in the Public Services. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
34.
Ferguson, A. (1997) ‘Moral Responsibility and Social Change: A New Theory of Self’ , Hypatia12(3): 116-141 .
35.
Ferguson, K. E. (1984) The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
36.
Findlen, B. (1995) Listen Up: Voices from the Next Feminist Generation. Seattle, WA: Seal Press .
37.
Fleming, P. (2002) ‘Lines of Flight: A History of Resistance and the Thematic of Ethics, Death and Animality’ , Ephemera2(3): 193-208 .
38.
Fleming, P. and Sewell, G. (2002) ‘Looking for the Good Soldier, Svejk: Alternative Modalities of Resistance in the Contemporary Workplace’ , Sociology36(4): 857-873 .
39.
Fleming, P. and Spicer, A. (2003) ‘Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance’ , Organization10(1): 157-179 .
40.
Foucault, M. (1974) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock .
41.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1979. Edited by C. Gordon . Brighton: Harvester Press .
42.
Garson, B. (1975) All the Livelong Day. London: Penguin .
43.
Gherardi, S. (2003) ‘Feminist Theory and Organisational Theory: A Dialogue on New Bases’, in H. Tsoukas and C. Knudsen (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
44.
Grosz, E. (1990) ‘Contemporary Theories of Power and Subjectivity’, in S. Gunew (ed.) Feminist Knowledge: Critique and Construct. London: Routledge .
45.
Gottfried, H. (1994) ‘Learning the Score: The Duality of Control and Everyday Resistance in the Temporary Help Service Industry’, in J. M. Jermier , D. Knights and W. R. Nord (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations, pp. 102-127. London: Routledge .
46.
Halford, S. , Savage, M. and Witz, A. (1997) Gender, Careers and Organisations. London: Macmillan .
47.
Harding, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
48.
Hartsock, N. (1983) ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’, in S. Harding and M. Hintikka (eds) Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel .
49.
Hartsock, N. (1985) ‘Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women?’, in M. Lejnaar , K. Davis , C. Helleman , J. Oldersmaa and D. Vos (eds) The Gender of Power. London: University of Leiden Press .
50.
Hartsock, N. (1990) ‘Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women?’, in L. J. Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge .
51.
Hekman, S. (1990) Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press .
52.
Hollander, E. P. (1998) ‘Resistance to Change’, in C. L. Cooper and C. Argyris (eds) The Concise Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Management. Oxford: Blackwell .
53.
Holmer-Nadesan, M. (1996) ‘Organizational Identity and Space of Action’ , Organization Studies17(1): 49-81 .
54.
Hood, C. (1991) ‘A Public Management for all Seasons?’ , Public Administration69: 3-19 .
55.
hooks, b. (1984) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston, MA: South End .
56.
Jermier, J. M. , Knights, D. and Nord, W. R. (1994) ‘Introduction’, in J. M. Jermier , D. Knights and W. R. Nord (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations. London: Routledge .
57.
Jones, C. (1999) ‘Social Work: Regulation and Managerialism’, in M. Exworthy and S. Halford (eds) Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press .
58.
Katila, S. and Meriläinen, S. (2002) ‘Metamorphosis: From “Nice Girls” to “Nice Bitches”: Resisting Patriarchal Articulations of Professional Identity’ , Gender, Work and Organization9(3): 336-354 .
59.
Kirkpatrick, I. , Ackroyd, S. and Walker, R. (2005) New Managerialism and Public Service Professions: Change in Health, Social Services and Housing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
60.
Knights, D. (2000) ‘Autonomy Retentiveness! Problems and Prospects for a Post-Humanist Feminism’ , Journal of Management Inquiry9(2): 173-185 .
61.
Knights, D. and Kerfoot, D. (2004) ‘Between Representations and Subjectivity: Gender Binaries and the Politics of Organizational Transformation’ , Gender, Work and Organization11(4): 430-453 .
62.
Knights, D. and McCabe, D. (2000) ‘Ain’t Misbehavin? Opportunities for Resistance Under New Forms of “Quality” Management’ , Sociology34(3): 421-436 .
63.
Knights, D. and Murray, F. (1995) Managers Divided: Organizational Politics and Information Technology Management. London: John Wiley and Sons .
64.
Kondo, D. (1990) Crafting Selves: Power, Gender and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
65.
LaNuez, D. and Jermier, J. M. (1994) ‘Sabotage by Managers and Technocrats: Neglected Patterns of Resistance at Work’, in J. M. Jermier , D. Knights and W. R. Nord (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations, pp. 219-251. London: Routledge .
66.
Lawler, J. and Hearn, J. (1995) ‘UK Public Service Organizations: The Rise of Managerialism and the Impact of Change on Social Services Departments’ , International Journal of Public Sector Management8(4): 7-16 .
67.
Lewis, J. and Glennerster, H. (1996) Implementing the New Community Care. Buckingham: Open University Press .
68.
Linstead, A. and Thomas, R. (2002) ‘What Do You Want From Me? A Post-structuralist Feminist Reading of Middle Managers’ Identities’ , Culture and Organization8(1): 1-21 .
69.
McNay, L. (1992) Foucault and Feminism. Cambridge, MA: Polity .
70.
McNay, L. (2000) Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity .
71.
McNay, L. (2003) ‘Agency, Anticipation and Indeterminacy in Feminist Theory’ , Feminist Theory4(2): 139-148 .
72.
Maddock, S. (1999) Challenging Women. London: Sage .
73.
Meyerson, D. E. and Fletcher, J. K. (2000) ‘A Modest Manifesto for Shattering the Glass Ceiling’ , Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb: 127-136 .
74.
Meyerson, D. E. and Scully, M. A. (1995) ‘Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change’ , Organization Science6(5): 585-600 .
75.
Newton, T. (1998) ‘Theorizing Subjectivity in Organizations: The Failure of Foucauldian Studies’ , Organization Studies19(3): 415-447 .
76.
Pollitt, C. (1993) Managerialism and the Public Services. Oxford: Blackwell .
77.
Pollert, A. (1981) Girls, Wives, Factory Lives. London: Macmillan .
78.
Prasad, A. and Prasad, P. (1998) ‘Everyday Struggles at the Workplace: The Nature and Implications of Routine Resistance in Contemporary Organizations’ , Research in the Sociology of Organizations16: 225-257 .
79.
Prasad, P. and Prasad, A. (2000) ‘Stretching the Iron Cage: The Constitution and Implications of Routine Workplace Resistance’ , Organization Science11(4): 387-403 .
80.
Pringle, R. (1988) Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power and Work. London: Verso .
81.
Raelin, J. (1991) The Clash of Cultures: Managers Managing Professionals. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press .
82.
Ramazanoglu, C. (1993) ‘Introduction’, in C. Ramazanoglu (ed.) Up Against Foucault: Explorations of Some Tensions Between Foucault and Feminism. London: Routledge .
83.
Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J. (2002) Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage .
84.
Said, E. (1979) Orientalism. London: Routledge .
85.
Sawicki, J. (1991) Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power and the Body. New York: Routledge .
86.
Sawicki, J. (1994) ‘Foucault, Feminism, and Questions of Identity’, in Gary Gutting (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, pp. 286-313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
87.
Sedgwick, E. K. (1990) Epistemologies of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California .
88.
Sedgwick, E. K. (1999) A Dialogue on Love. Boston, MA: Beacon Press .
89.
Sewell, G. (2000) ‘The Prison-House of Language: the Penitential Discourse of Organizational Power’, in R. Westwood and S. Linstead (eds) The Language of Organization. London: Sage .
90.
Smith, C. (2001) ‘Trust and Confidence: Possibilities for Social Work in High Modernity’ , British Journal of Social Work31(2): 287-316 .
91.
Spelman, E. (1988) Inessential Women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press .
92.
Spivak, G. (1987) In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York: Methuen .
93.
Spivak, G. (1990) The Post-Colonial Critic: Essays, Strategies, Dialogues. Edited by S. Harasym. New York: Routledge .
94.
Stanley, L. (1990) Feminist Praxis. London: Routledge .
95.
Strebel, P. (1996) ‘Why Do Employees Resist Change?’ , Harvard Business Review May to June: 86-92 .
96.
Sugiman, P. (1992) ‘“That Wall’s Comin’ Down”: Gendered Strategies of Worker Resistance in the UAW Canadian Region (1963-1970)’ , Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie17(1): 1-27 .
97.
Sum, Ngai-Ling (2000) ‘From Politics of Identity to Politics of Complexity’, in S. Ahmed , J. Kilby , C. Lury , M. McNeil and B. Skeggs (eds) Transformations: Thinking Through Feminism. London: Routledge .
98.
Thomas, R. (1996) ‘Gendered Cultures and Performance Appraisal: The Experience of Women Academics’ , Gender, Work and Organization3(3): 143-155 .
99.
Thomas, R. and Davies, A. (2005) ‘Theorising the Micropolitics of Resistance: New Public Management and Managerial Identities in the UK Public Services’ , Organization Studies, 26(5): 683-706 .
100.
Townley, B. (1994) Reframing Human Resource Management: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work. London: Sage .
101.
Townsley, N. (2003) ‘Review Article: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Mapping the Gendered Theories, Voices and Politics of Organization’ , Organization10(3): 617-639 .
102.
Ursell, G. (2004) ‘The Bearable Lightness of Being: Identity Formation, Resistance and Gender Considerations Among the UK Television Workforce’, in R. Thomas , A. J. Mills and J. Helms Mills (eds) Identities Politics at Work: Resisting Gender, Gendering Resistance. London: Routledge .
103.
Valdivia, A. N. (2002) ‘bell hooks: Ethics from the Margins’ , Qualitative Enquiry8(4): 429-447 .
104.
Weedon, C. (1987) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Blackwell .
105.
Weedon, C. (1999) Feminism, Theory and the Politics of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell .
106.
Weeks, K. (1998) Constituting Feminist Subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
107.
White, C. (1987) ‘Why Do Workers Bother? Paradoxes of Resistance in Two English Factories’ , Critique of Anthropology7: 51-68 .
108.
Willmott, H. (1993) ‘Strength is Ignorance; Slavery is Freedom: Managing Culture in Modern Organizations’ , Journal of Management Studies30(4): 515-552 .
109.
Willmott, H. (1997) ‘Rethinking Management and Managerial Work: Capitalism, Control and Subjectivity’ , Human Relations50(11): 1329-1359 .
110.
Witz, A. (1990) Professions and Patriarchy. London: Routledge .
111.
Wolf, N. (1993) Fire with Fire: The New Female Power and How it Will Change the Twenty-First Century. New York: Random House .
