Publication in the top journals of management studies is highly skewed. Very few authors publish in these top journals. They are said to be the best few, on the assumption that skew indicates quality. Yet, skew is natural in any distribution and would occur in the absence of all quality. Peer review is supposed to ensure that this cannot happen, but pressure to publish in top journals puts demands on the peer review system it was never intended to bear. One result is that the skewed few tend to be the same few. We look at how this is arranged. We investigate the citation of the skewed few. We find much self citation, mutual citation and group citation. This behaviour is encouraged by the paramount importance of the journal impact factor. The article looks at how this indicator has been contrived for commercial rather than academic reasons, and considers some of the consequences.
Allison, P. and Stewart, J. ( 1974) ‘Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage’, American Sociological Review39(4): 596-606.
2.
Amin, M. and Mabe, M. ( 2000) ‘Impact Factors: Use and Abuse’, Perspectives in Publishing1: 1-6.
3.
Arthur, W. ( 1989) ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events’, Economic Journal99: 116-31.
4.
Barker, K. ( 2007) ‘The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The Evolution of a National Research Evaluation System’, Research Evaluation16(1): 3-12.
5.
Borokhovich, K., Bricker, R. and Simkins, B. ( 1999) ‘Financial Management’s Success as an Academic Journal’, Financial Management28(3): 76-82.
6.
Bunting, C. ( 2005) ‘Early Careers Spent Grinding Teeth, Not Cutting Them’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 25 February, p.18.
7.
Ceci, S. and Peters, D. ( 1982) ‘Peer Review. A Study of Reliability’, Change: The Magazine of Higher Education14(6): 44-8.
8.
Chew, M., Villanueva, E. and Van Der Weyden, M. ( 2007) ‘Life and Times of the Impact Factor: Retrospective Analysis of Trends for Seven Medical Journals (1994-2005) and Their Editors’ Views’, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine100: 142-50.
9.
Cole, J. and Cole, S. ( 1973) Social Stratification in Science. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
10.
Corbyn, Z. ( 2008) ‘Philosophers in Ranking Protest’, Times Higher Education, 28 August, p.15.
11.
Cross, J. ( 2009) ‘Impact Factors-The Basics’, in G. Stone (ed.) The E-Resources Management Handbook, UK Serials Group. Available at http://serials.uksg.org/app/home/contribution.asp?
12.
David, P. ( 1985) ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review75(2): 332-37.
13.
Diamond, A. ( 1986) ‘What is a Citation Worth?’, Journal of Human Resources21(2): 200-15.
14.
Frey, B. ( 2003) ‘Publishing as Prostitution?-Choosing Between One’s Own Ideas and Academic Success’, Public Choice116: 205-23.
15.
Garfield, E. ( 1996) ‘Citation Indexes for Retrieval and Research Evaluation’ , paper presented at a conference on Theory and Practice of Research Assessment, Capri, 7 October 1996.
16.
Garfield, E. ( 1998) ‘I Had a Dream … About Uncitedness’ , Scientist12: 14.
17.
Garfield, E. ( 2006) ‘The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor’ , Journal of the American Medical Association295(1): 90-93.
18.
Hagstrom, W. ( 1974) ‘Competition in Science’, American Sociological Review39(1): 1-18.
19.
Hamilton, D. ( 1990) ‘Publishing by-and For?-The Numbers’, Science250(4986): 1331-132.
Hansson, F. ( 2006) ‘Research Evaluation and Organisational Learning in the University: A Possible Coexistence?’, International Journal of Learning and Change1(3): 267-84.
22.
Icies (2010) Call for Papers13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 17 November.
23.
Jones, M., Brinn, T. and Pendlebury, M. ( 1996) ‘Journal Evaluation Methodologies: A Balanced Response’ , Omega24(5): 607-12.
24.
Judge, T. ( 2003) ‘Marginalizing the Journal of Applied Psychology’ , Industrial Psychologist40(1): 56-59.
25.
Judge, T. and Cable, D. ( 2004) ‘The Effect of Physical Height on Workplace Success and Income: Preliminary Test of a Theoretical Model’, Journal of Applied Psychology89(3): 428-41.
26.
Judge, T., Cable, D.Colbert, A. and Rynes, S. ( 2007) ‘What Causes a Management Article to be Cited- Article, Author or Journal?’, Academy of Management Journal50(3): 491-506.
27.
Jump, P. ( 2010) ‘The Expanding Universe of Scientific Authorship’ , Times Higher Education, 8 July, p. 21.
28.
Kaplan, N. ( 1965) ‘The Norms of Citation Behavior: Prolegomena to the Footnote’, American Documentation16(3): 179-84.
29.
Kmietowicz, Z. ( 2004) ‘Consumer Organizations Criticize Influence of Drug Companies’, British Medical Journal329(7472): 937.
30.
Lacasse, J. and Leo, J. ( 2010) ‘Ghostwriting at Elite Medical Centers in the United States’, PLoS Medicine7(2): 1-4.
31.
Laroche, H. ( 2010) ‘Announcement to Reviewers’, email, 5 November.
32.
Leung, K. ( 2007) ‘The Glory and the Tyranny of Citation Impact: An East Asian Perspective’, Academy of Management Journal50(3): 510-13.
33.
Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. ( 2007a) ‘Aardvark et al. … : Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies’, Journal of Information Science33(6): 702-17.
34.
Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. ( 2007b) ‘Ring a Ring O’ Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies’, Journal of Management Studies44(4): 640-55.
35.
Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. ( 2008) ‘Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies’, Management Research News31(9): 595-606.
36.
Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. ( 2009) ‘Publishing in Top Journals-A Never-ending Fad’ , Scandinavian Journal of Management25(2): 221-24.
37.
Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. ( 2010) ‘Counting footnotes: citability in Management Studies’ , Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 2, pp.189-203.
38.
Martindale, C. ( 1995), ‘Fame More Fickle Than Fortune: On the Distribution of Literary Eminence’, Poetics23: 219-34.
39.
McVeigh, M. ( 2009) ‘Journal Self Citation in the Journal Citation Reports’ , available at http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/journal_self_citation_jcr (accessed January 2011).
40.
Medoff, M. ( 2003) ‘Editorial Favoritism in Economics?’, Southern Economic Journal70, 2: , 425-34.
41.
Merilainen, S., Tienari, J., Thomas, R. and Davies, A. ( 2008) ‘Hegemonic Academic Practices: Experiences of Publishing from the Periphery’, Organization15(4): 584-97.
42.
Merton, R. ( 1936) ‘The Unintended Consequences of Purposive Social Actions’, American Sociological Review1(6): 894-904.
43.
Merton, R. ( 1942/1973) ‘The Normative Structure of Science’ , in N. W. Storer (ed.) The Sociology of Science, pp. 267-78. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Merton, R. ( 1968) ‘The Matthew Effect in Science’, Science159(3810): 56-63.
45.
Miller, C. ( 2006) ‘Peer Review in the Organizational and Management Sciences: Prevalence and Effects of Reviewer Hostility, Bias, and Dissensus’, Academy of Management Journal49(3): 425-31.
46.
Miner, J. ( 2003) ‘Commentary on Arthur Bedeian’s ‘The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Roles of Authors, Referees, and Editors’, Journal of Management Inquiry12(4): 339-43.
47.
Monastersky, R. ( 2005) ‘The Number That’s Devouring Science’ , Chronicle of Higher Education52(8): A12.
48.
Moravcsik, M. ( 1973) ‘Measures of Scientific Growth’, Research Policy2: 266-75.
49.
Narin, F. and Breitzman, A. ( 1995) ‘Inventive Productivity’, Research Policy24: 507-19.
50.
Oswald, H. and Jalles, J. ( 2008) ‘Can We Test for Bias in Scientific Peer-Review?’ , paper presented to the Workshop on New Challenges to the Economics of Business Schools and Universities, Paris, December.
51.
Paul, R. ( 2008) ‘Measuring Research Quality: The United Kingdom Government’s Research Assessment Exercise’, European Journal of Information Systems17: 324-9.
52.
Pendlebury, D. ( 1991) ‘Science, Citation, and Funding’, Science251: 1410-11.
53.
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, N. and Backrach, D. ( 2008) ‘Scholarly Influence in the Field of Management: A Bibliographic Analysis of the Determinants of University and Author Impact in the Management Literature of the Past Quarter Century’, Journal of Management34(4): 641-720.
54.
Price, D. ( 1964) ‘Ethics of Scientific Publication’, Science144: 655-57.
55.
Segalla, M. ( 2008) ‘Publishing in the Right Place or Publishing the Right Thing: Journal Targeting and Citations’ Strategies for Promotion and Tenure Committees’, European Journal of International Management2(2): 122-27.
56.
Seglen, P. ( 1992) ‘The Skewness of Science’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science43(9): 628-38.
57.
Shockley, W. ( 1957) ‘On the Statistics of Individual Variations of Productivity in Research Laboratories’, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers45(3): 279-90.
58.
Simon, H. ( 1955) ‘On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions’ , Biometrika42(3/4): 425-40.
59.
Starbuck, W. ( 2003) ‘Turning Lemons into Lemonade: Where is the Value in Peer Reviews?’, Journal of Management Inquiry12: 344-51.
60.
Tahir, T. ( 2008) ‘Cleaning up the Act’, Times Higher Education, 28 August, pp.30-35.
61.
Tourish, D.( 2010) ‘Performativity, Metatheorising and Journal Rankings: What are the Implications for Emerging Journals, and Academic Freedom?’ , Working Paper 233, Kent Business School, University of Canterbury, November.
62.
US Senate (2010) ‘Ghostwriting in Medical Literature’, Minority Staff Report, Senate Committee on Finance, 24 June.
63.
Verdaasdonk, H. ( 1985) ‘Empirical Sociology of Literature as a Non-textually Oriented Form of Research’, Poetics14: 173-85.
64.
Wells, P. ( 2010) ‘The ABS Rankings of Journal Quality: An Exercise in Delusion’, Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society, Cardiff University.
65.
Willmott, H. ( 1995) ‘Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the UK’, Human Relations48(9): 993-1027.
66.
Young, N., Ioannidis, J. and Al-Ubaydli, O. ( 2008) ‘Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science’ , PLoS Medicine5: 10.
