On the crucial role of ellipticity on elastohydrodynamic film thickness and friction

Abstract

The study reported here deals with elastohydrodynamic point contacts and it is focused on the influence of contact ellipticity. In five velocity–load reference cases, ellipticity was varied from slender to wide configurations, including the circular contact. For each case, Hertzian pressure, Hertzian area, load, and entrainment velocity were kept constant while the ellipticity was varied by changing the curvature radii. In this context, the maximum central film thickness did not occur for the infinitely wide contact, but for a slender configuration close to the circular case. Moreover, the minimum film thickness reached its optimum for a wide but finite elliptical contact. For low ellipticity ratios, specific film thickness features were obtained. In particular, very high central/minimum film thickness ratios are found. The cause of these behaviors was found in the change of the convergent shape. When the ellipticity was varied, the Poiseuille flows parallel and transverse to the entrainment direction were significantly modified and these modifications were quantitatively analyzed for the different cases. The competition between the Couette and the Poiseuille flows was totally different between the narrow and the wide elliptical contact, and this change was responsible for the film thickness variations with ellipticity. Ellipticity also had an effect on friction as it influenced the maximum pressure which in turn impacts the fluid viscosity.

Keywords

Elastohydrodynamic lubrication elliptical contact slender configuration wide elliptical contact film thickness friction numerical model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hamrock

Dowson

. Isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of point contacts - Part 1 - Theoretical formulation. ASME J Tribol 1976; 98: 223–228.

Hamrock

Dowson

. Isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of point contacts - Part 2 - Ellipticity parameter results. ASME J Tribol 1976; 98: 375–383.

Mostophi

Gohar

. Oil film thickness and pressure distribution in elastohydrodynamic point contacts. J Mech Eng Sci 1982; 24: 173–182.

Evans

Snidle

. Analysis of elastohydrodynamic lubrication of elliptical contacts with rolling along the major axis. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 1983; 197: 209–211.

Chittenden

Dowson

Dunn

. A theoretical analysis of the isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of concentrated contacts - Part 1: Direction of lubricant entrainment coincident with the major axis of the hertzian contact ellipse. Proc R Soc Lond 1985; A397: 245–269.

Chittenden

Dowson

Dunn

. A theoretical analysis of the isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of concentrated contacts - Part 2: General case, with lubricant entrainment along either principal axis of the hertzian contact ellipse or at some intermediate angle. Proc R Soc Lond 1985; A397: 271–294.

Thorp

Gohar

. Oil film thickness and shape for a ball sliding in a grooved raceway. ASME J Tribol 1972; 94: 199–208.

Bahadoran

Gohar

. The oil film in elasto-hydrodynamic elliptical contacts. Wear 1974; 29: 264–270.

Gledhill RH, Jackson A and Cameron A. An interferometric study of the EHL of elliptical contacts aligned in the direction of rolling. In: Proceedings of the fifth Leeds–Lyon symposium on tribology, “Elastohydrodynamics and related topics”, Leeds, Mechanical Engineering Publication Limited, London, September 1978, pp.116–120.

10.

Koye

Winer

. An experimental evaluation of the Hamrock and Dowson minimum film thickness equation for fully flooded EHD point contacts. ASME J Tribol 1981; 103: 284–294.

11.

Chittenden

Dowson

Taylor

. Elastohydrodynamic film thickness in concentrated contacts: Part 1: Experimental investigation for lubricant entrainment aligned with the major axis of the contact ellipse. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 1986; 200: 207–217.

12.

Evans

Snidle

. Wildhaber–Novikov circular arc gears: Elastohydrodynamics. ASME J Tribol 1993; 115: 487–492.

13.

Nijenbanning

Venner

Moes

. Film thickness in elastohydrodynamically lubricated elliptic contacts. Wear 1994; 176: 217–229.

14.

Sharif

de Ling

Alanou

. Film thickness predictions for elastohydrodynamic elliptical contacts over a wide range of radius ratios with consideration of side starvation. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2000; 214: 63–78.

15.

Zhu

. Elastohydrodynamic lubrication in extended parameter ranges, Part III: Ellipticity effect. Tribol Trans 2003; 46: 585–591.

16.

Holmes

MJA

Evans

Snidle

. Discussion of the paper “Elastohydrodynamic lubrication in extended parameter ranges part II: Load effect” (Tribol Trans 2002; 45: 549–555 by Dong Zhu). Tribol Trans 2003; 46: 282–288.

17.

Morales-Espejel

Dumont

Lugt

. A limiting solution for the dependence of film thickness on velocity in EHL contacts with very thin films. Tribol Trans 2005; 48: 317–327.

18.

Damiens B. Modélisation de la lubrification sous-alimentée dans les contacts elastohydrodynamiques elliptiques. PhD Thesis, INSA de Lyon, 2003 (in French).

19.

Venner

Lubrecht

. Revisiting film thickness in slender elasto-hydrodynamically lubricated contacts. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2010; 224: 2549–2558.

20.

Doki-Thonon

Fillot

Morales-Espejel

. A dual experimental numerical approach for film thickness analysis in TEHL spinning skewing circular contacts. Tribol Lett 2013; 50: 115–126.

21.

Habchi

Eyheramendy

Vergne

. A full-system approach to the elastohydrodynamic line/point contact problem. ASME J Tribol 2008; 130: 21501–21510.

22.

Habchi

Eyheramendy

Bair

. Thermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of point contacts using a Newtonian/generalized Newtonian lubricant. Tribol Lett 2008; 30: 41–52.

23.

Bair

Mary

Bouscharain

. An improved Yasutomi correlation for viscosity at high pressure. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2013; 227: 1056–1060.

24.

Johnson

. Contact mechanics, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

25.

Harris

. Rolling bearing analysis, New York: Wiley, 1966.

26.

Moes

. Optimum similarity analysis with applications to elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Wear 1992; 159: 57–66.

27.

Blok H. Inverse problems in hydrodynamic lubrication and design directives for lubricated flexible surfaces. In: Proceedings international symposium on lubrication and wear, Houston, USA, 1963. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corp.

28.

van Leeuwen

. The determination of the pressure–viscosity coefficient of a lubricant through an accurate film thickness formula and accurate film thickness measurements. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2009; 223: 1143–1163.