Automotive engines are believed to operate predominantly in the hydrodynamic regime, as evidenced by the (1) the successful strategy of reducing lubricant viscosity to reduce engine friction and improve vehicle fuel consumption, and (2) for most engine operating conditions, direct measurements of engine friction (either motored or fired) find that engine friction increases with increasing engine speed. However, certain components in an engine are known to operate mainly in the mixed/boundary lubrication (e.g. the valve train) and other components (such as the piston rings) operate in the mixed/boundary regime for a portion of the time. In order to quantify the amount of mixed/boundary lubrication in an engine, and in the individual components of the engine, motored and fired friction tests have been carried out for a range of lubricants (of differing viscosity grade, and with/without friction modifier additives). A full discussion of the implications of this work, which includes the impact of fuel dilution and “running-in” is included with insights given into how the work reported here guides the development of future fuel-efficient engine lubricants.
GishREMcCulloughJDRetzloffJB, et al.Determination of true engine friction. SAE Transac1958; 66: 649–661.
2.
Kovach JT, Tsakiris EA and Wong LT. Engine friction reduction for improved fuel economy. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper, SAE 820085, 1982.
3.
Rezeka SF and Henein NA. A new approach to evaluate instantaneous friction and its components in internal combustion engines. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper, SAE 840179, 1984.
Ball WF, Jackson NS, Pilley AD, et al. The friction of a 1.6 litre automotive engine – gasoline and diesel. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper, SAE 860418, 1986.
6.
MonaghanML. Engine friction – a change in emphasis. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering1988; 202: 215–226.
7.
SoejimaMWakuriYKitaharaT, et al.Studies on the measuring method of the total friction loss of internal combustion engines. JSAE Rev1994; 15: 101–107.
8.
Noorman MT, Assanis DN and Patterson DJ. Overview of techniques for measuring friction using bench tests & fired engines. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper, SAE 2000-01-1780, 2000.
9.
Schwaderlapp M, Koch F and Jürgen D. Friction reduction – the engine's mechanical contribution to saving fuel. Seoul 2000 FISITA World Automotive Congress, Paper F2000A165, 2000.
10.
Mufti RA. Total and component friction in a motored and firing engine. PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Leeds University, Leeds, UK, 2004.
11.
Shayler PJ, Leong DKW and Murphy M. Contributions to engine friction during cold, low speed running and the dependence on oil viscosity. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper, SAE 2005-01-1654, 2005.
12.
MuftiRAPriestM. Technique of simultaneous synchronised evaluation of the tribological components of an engine under realistic conditions. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2009; 223: 1311–1325.
13.
CardenPPisaniCAnderssonJ, et al.The effect of low viscosity oils on the wear, friction, and fuel consumption of a heavy duty truck engine. SAE Int J Fuels Lubricants2013; 6: 311–319.
14.
StaronJTWillermetPA. An analysis of valve train friction in terms of lubrication principles. SAE Transac1983; 92: 625–639.
15.
van HeldenAKvan der MeerRJvan StaadenJJ, et al.Dynamic friction in cam/tappet lubrication. SAE Transac1985; 94: 224–231.
16.
LeeJPattersonDJMorrisonKM, et al.Friction measurement in the valve train with a roller follower. SAE Transac1994; 103: 963–969.
17.
Teodorescu M, Taraza D, Henein N, et al. Experimental analysis of dynamics and friction in valve train systems. SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0484, 2002.
18.
MuftiRAPriestM. Experimental and theoretical study of instantaneous engine valve train friction. J Tribol2003; 125: 628–637.
19.
TeodorescuMKushwahaMRahnejatH, et al.Multi-physics analysis of valve train systems: from system level to microscale interactions. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2007; 221: 349–361.
20.
RoshanRPriestMNevilleA, et al.Friction modelling in an engine valve train considering the sensitivity to lubricant formulation. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2009; 223: 413–424.
21.
GuoJZhangWZouD. Investigation of dynamic characteristics of a valve train system. Mech Mach Theor2011; 46: 1950–1969.
22.
TaylorRI. Tribology and energy efficiency: from molecules to lubricated contacts to complete machines. Faraday Discuss2012; 156: 361–382.
23.
Furuhama S and Takiguchi M. Measurement of piston frictonal force in actual operating diesel engine. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper, SAE 790855, 1979.
24.
Uras H and Patterson D. Measurement of piston and ring assembly friction instantaneous IMEP method. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper, SAE 830416, 1983.
25.
TakiguchiMMachidaKFuruhamaS. Piston friction force of a small high speed gasoline engine. J Tribol1988; 110: 112–118.
26.
Taylor RI, Kitahara T, Saito T, et al. Piston assembly friction and wear: the influence of lubricant viscometry. In: Proceedings of the international tribology conference, Yokohama, Japan, 29 October–2 November 1995.
27.
Koch F, Geiger U and Hermsen F. PIFFO – piston friction force measurements during engine operation. Society of Automotive Engineers Paper SAE 960306, 1996.
28.
ChoSChoiSBaeC. An experimental measurement of lubrication behaviour of piston rings in a spark ignition engine. JSME Int J Ser B2002; 45: 373–378.
29.
MuftiRAPriestM. Experimental evaluation of piston-assembly friction under motored and fired conditions in a gasoline engine. J Tribol2004; 127: 826–836.
30.
GoreMTheakerMHowell-SmithS, et al.Direct measurement of piston friction of internal combustion engines using the floating liner principle. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2014; 228: 344–354.
31.
MuftiRAPriestM. Theoretical and experimental evaluation of engine bearing performance. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2009; 223: 629–644.
32.
CardenPPisaniCLainéE, et al.Calculation of crank train friction in a heavy duty truck engine and comparison with measured data. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2012; 227: 168–184.
33.
Professor Martin Priest, Bradford University, Private Communication.
34.
PriestMDowsonDTaylorCM. Predictive wear modelling of lubricated piston rings in a diesel engine. Wear1999; 231: 89–101.
35.
TaylorRI. Squeeze film lubrication in piston rings and reciprocating contacts. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2015; 229: 977–988.
36.
Ricardo Consulting Engineers, Shoreham Technical Centre, Old Shoreham Road, Shoreham-By-Sea, BN43 5FG, UK.
37.
TaylorRIDixonRTWayneFD, et al.Lubricants & energy efficiency: life-cycle analysis. Tribol Interf Eng2005; 48: 565–572.
38.
Taylor RI, Hu H, Stow C, et al. Extending the limits of fuel economy through lubrication. SAE Paper 2017-01-2344, 2017.
39.
Furuhama S and Sasaki S. Effect of oil properties on piston frictional forces. JSAE Rev 1984; 15: 68–76.
40.
Zhmud B. Viscosity blending equations. Lube Magazine, No. 121, June 2014, pp.22–27.
41.
ZhuLChenJLiuY, et al.Experimental analysis for the evaporation of gasoline. J Loss Prevent Proc Ind2012; 25: 916–922.
