The entrapment/rejection process of spherical, rigid microparticles in elliptical, rough elastohydrodynamic contacts is modelled. An earlier model of the author is extended to include van der Waals intermolecular forces, in addition to mechanical (reaction and friction) and fluid–particle forces. Surface roughness effects are also introduced in terms of the intermolecular force formulation and in the microscale friction (particle–asperity) sub-model. Possibilities related to particle entry into a contact are quantified by weight factors and performance indices. A total entrapment index is defined and linked to the probability of particle entrapment. A parametric analysis investigates the effect of the intermolecular particle force on the entrapment probability by varying the contact load, lubricant viscosity, elastic modulus of the contacting solids, contact velocity and the macroscopic (Coulomb) coefficient of friction.
NikasGK. A state-of-the-art review on the effects of particulate contamination and related topics in machine-element contacts. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2010; 224: 453–479. DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET752.
2.
NikasGK. Review of studies on the detrimental effects of solid contaminants in lubricated machine element contacts. In: HayworthGI (ed.) Reliability engineering advances. New York, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers, 2009, Chapter 1, pp.1–44, ISBN: 9781606923290.
3.
Dwyer-JoyceRS. The effects of lubricant contamination on rolling bearing performance. PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, Department of Mechanical Engineering, London, England, 1993.
4.
NikasGK. Theoretical modelling of the entrainment and thermomechanical effects of contamination particles in elastohydrodynamic contacts. PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, Department of Mechanical Engineering, London, England, 1999.
5.
Dwyer-JoyceRS. Predicting the abrasive wear of ball bearings by lubricant debris. Wear1999; 233–235: 692–701. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00184-2.
6.
Dwyer-JoyceRSHamerJCSaylesRS, et al. Lubricant screening for debris effects to improve fatigue and wear life. In: Proc. 18th Leeds–Lyon symposium on tribology, Elsevier Tribology and Interface Engineering Series, Lyon, France, 3–6 September 1991, vol. 21, pp.57–63. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8922(08)70509-1.
7.
KusanoYHutchingsIM. Modelling the entrainment and motion of particles in a gap: application to abrasive wear. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2003; 217: 427–433. DOI: 10.1243/135065003322620255.
8.
ZhongZZhangYHanH. A simple model of the entrainment of particles in a gap considering elasticity. In: Proc. STLE/ASME international joint tribology conference IJTC2008, Miami, Florida, USA, 20–22 October 2008, paper no. IJTC2008-71069, pp.461–463. New York, NY, USA: ASME. DOI: 10.1115/IJTC2008-71069.
9.
Morales-EspejelGMGabelliA. Particle entrapment and indentation process in rolling bearings. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2016; 230: 1572–1587. DOI: 10.1177/1350650116641018.
10.
NikasGK. Mathematical analysis of the entrapment of solid spherical particles in non-conformal contacts. ASME J Tribol2001; 123: 83–93. DOI: 10.1115/1.1314605.
11.
NikasGK. Particle entrapment in line elastohydrodynamic contacts and the influence of intermolecular (van der Waals) forces. Lubricants2020; 8: 1–25, article 60. DOI: 10.3390/lubricants8050060.
12.
NikasGKSaylesRSIoannidesE. Effects of debris particles in sliding/rolling elastohydrodynamic contacts. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology1998; 212: 333–343. DOI: 10.1243/1350650981542146.
13.
NikasGK. Particle entrainment in elastohydrodynamic point contacts and related risks of oil starvation and surface indentation. ASME J Tribol2002; 124: 461–467. DOI: 10.1115/1.1467083.
14.
NikasGK. A mechanistic model of spherical particle entrapment in elliptical contacts. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2006; 220: 507–522. DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET126.
15.
NikasGK. Effects of operating conditions and friction on the entrapment of spherical debris particles in elliptical contacts. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2007; 221: 727–741. DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET283.
16.
StrubelV. Particle entrapment in EHD contacts – aerospace applications. PhD Thesis, University of Lyon, Mechanics of Structures, Lyon, France, 2016.
17.
StrubelVFillotNVilleF, et al.Particle entrapment in hybrid lubricated point contacts. Tribol Trans2016; 59: 768–779. DOI: 10.1080/10402004.2015.1106631.
18.
StrubelVFillotNVilleF, et al.Particle entrapment in rolling element bearings: the effect of ellipticity, nature of materials, and sliding. Tribol Trans2017; 60: 373–382. DOI: 10.1080/10402004.2016.1168901.
ElsharkawyAAHamrockBJ. Subsurface stresses in micro-EHL line contacts. ASME J Tribol1991; 113: 645–656. DOI: 10.1115/1.2920673.
22.
RoelandsCJA. Correlation aspects of the viscosity-temperature-pressure relationship of lubricating oils. PhD Thesis, Technische Hogeschool, Delft, the Netherlands, 1966.
23.
WangGTYWongPL. Pressure dependence of the limiting shear stress coefficient of liquid lubricants. In: LuoJMengYShaoTZhaoQ (eds) Advanced tribology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, pp.206–210. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03653-8_68.
24.
ZhuDChengHS. Effect of surface roughness on the point contact EHL. ASME J Tribol1988; 110: 32–37. DOI: 10.1115/1.3261571.
25.
MasjediMKhonsariMM. On the effect of surface roughness in point-contact EHL: formulas for film thickness and asperity load. Tribol Int2015; 82: 228–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2014.09.010.
26.
RumpfH. Particle technology. English ed., London, England: Chapman and Hall, 1990, ISBN: 9789401179461.
27.
RabinovichYIAdlerJJAtaA, et al.Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces: i. Role of asperity geometry. J Colloid Interf Sci2000; 232: 10–16. DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7167.
28.
NikasGK. Boussinesq–Cerruti functions and a simple technique for substantial acceleration of subsurface stress computations in elastic half-spaces. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2006; 220: 19–28. DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET125.
29.
JacobsonB. A high pressure-short time shear strength analyzer for lubricants. ASME J Tribol1985; 107: 220–223. DOI: 10.1115/1.3261024.
30.
NikasGK. Particle extrusion in elastohydrodynamic line contacts: dynamic forces and energy consumption. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2017; 231: 1320–1340. DOI: 10.1177/1350650117693175.
CusanoCSlineyHE. Dynamics of solid dispersions in oil during the lubrication of point contacts, part I: graphite. ASLE Trans1982; 25: 183–189. DOI: 10.1080/05698198208983079.
33.
CusanoCSlineyHE. Dynamics of solid dispersions in oil during the lubrication of point contacts, part II: molybdenum disulfide. ASLE Trans1982; 25: 190–197. DOI: 10.1080/05698198208983080.
34.
Dwyer-JoyceRSHeymerJ. The entrainment of solid particles into rolling elastohydrodynamic contacts. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Leeds-Lyon symposium on tribology, Lyon, France, Tribology Series 31, 1996, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp.135–140.
35.
WanGTYSpikesHA. The behavior of suspended solid particles in rolling and sliding elastohydrodynamic contacts. Tribol Trans1988; 31: 12–21. DOI: 10.1080/10402008808981793.
36.
CannPMEHamerJCSaylesRS, et al.Direct observation of particle entry and deformation in a rolling EHD contact. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Leeds–Lyon symposium on tribology, Lyon, France, Tribology Series 31, 1996, pp.127–134. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8922(08)70776-4
37.
HamrockBJSchmidSRJacobsonBO. Fundamentals of fluid film lubrication. 2nd ed.New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2004, ISBN: 0824753712.
38.
WuCSKlausEEDudaJL. Development of a method for the prediction of pressure-viscosity coefficients of lubricating oils based on free-volume theory. ASME J Tribol1989; 111: 121–128. DOI: 10.1115/1.3261861.
