The functional index for living with multiple sclerosis: development and validation of a new quality of life questionnaire

Abstract

Addressing health-related quality of life is considered a desirable component of routine care for patients with multiple sclerosis. However, use of available health-related quality of life surveys is not part of routine multiple sclerosis care, possibly due to administration, scoring, and interpretation challenges presented by available questionnaires. The 25-item Functional Index for Living with Multiple Sclerosis (FILMS) questionnaire was developed and validated to allow providers to monitor and easily apply health-related quality of life information to the patient encounter. The development and pilot test processes and the results of the validation study are reported here. Convergent validity, internal consistency reliability, and test—retest reproducibility were evaluated. Strong correlations of Functional Index for Living with Multiple Sclerosis subscales with control questionnaires were demonstrated by Pearson’s correlation coefficients from 0.73 to 0.88. Internal consistency reliabilities ranged from 0.80 to 0.90, demonstrating that items were grouped into the appropriate subscale domains and that the subscale domains and the questionnaire as a whole exhibited good directionality. Test—retest reproducibility was 0.91.

Keywords

multiple sclerosis quality of life validation studies psychometrics questionnaires chronic disease

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Solari A. Role of health-related quality of life measures in the routine care of people with multiple sclerosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 16.

Miller DM , Kinkel RP Health-related quality of life assessment in multiple sclerosis. Rev Neurol Dis 2008; 5: 56-64.

Benito-Leon J. , Morales JM , Rivera-Navarro J. , Mitchell A. A review about the impact of multiple sclerosis on health-related quality of life. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 1291-1303.

Riazi A. Patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. Int Mult Scler J 2006; 13: 92-99.

Schipper H. , Clinch J. , McMurray A. , Levitt M. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the functional living index-cancer: development and validation. J Clin Oncol 1984 ; 2: 472-483.

Cella DF , Dineen K. , Arnason B. , et al. Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life questionnaire. Neurology 1996 ; 47: 129-139.

Gold SM , Heesen C. , Schulz H. , et al. Disease specific quality of life instruments in multiple sclerosis: validation of the hamburg quality of life questionnaire in multiple sclerosis (HAQUAMS). Mult Scler 2001; 7: 119-130.

Hobart J. , Lamping D. , Fitzpatrick R. , Riazi A. , Thompson A. The multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29): a new patient-based outcome measure. Brain 2001; 124: 962-973.

Vickrey BG , Hays RD , Harooni R. , Myers LW , Ellison GW A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 187-206.

10.

Rotstein Z. , Barak Y. , Noy S. , Achiron A. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: development and validation of the ‘RAYS’ scale and comparison with the SF-36. Int J Qual Health Care 2000; 12: 511-517.

11.

Ford HL , Gerry E. , Tennant A. , Whalley D. , Haigh R. , Johnson MH Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 247-258.

12.

Minden SL , Frankel D. , Hadden L. , Perloff J. , Srinath KP , Hoaglin DC The Sonya Slifka longitudinal multiple sclerosis study: methods and sample characteristics. Mult Scler 2006; 12: 24-38.

13.

The Canadian burden of illness study group. Burden of illness of multiple sclerosis: Part II: Quality of Life. Can J Neurol Sci 1998; 25: 31-38.

14.

Freeman JA , Hobart JC , Langdon DW , Thompson AJ Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: the 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 150-156.