The effects of robot-assisted gait training in progressive multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background:

Gait and mobility impairments are common in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), leading to reduced quality of life (QoL).

Objective:

In this randomized controlled study, we tested the effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) and compared it to conventional physiotherapy, measuring walking ability, depression, fatigue, and QoL in patients with progressive MS and severe gait disability.

Methods:

Fifty-two participants (Expanded Disability Status Scale score 6–7) completed the study protocol. They received two sessions/week over 6 weeks of RAGT or conventional walking therapy. Outcome measures were Six-Minute Walk Test, Ten-Meter Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, and Short Form 36. They were performed pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 3 months.

Results:

Walking endurance (p < 0.01) and balance (p < 0.01) were improved among those in the RAGT group. Positive effects on depression in both treatment groups were highlighted. However, only among those in the RAGT group was perceived physical functioning QoL increased. No significant effects on fatigue were found.

Conclusion:

RAGT is a treatment option in progressive MS patients with severe gait impairments to induce short-lasting effects on mobility and QoL.

Keywords

Robot-assisted gait training rehabilitation multiple sclerosis gait QoL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Feinstein

Freeman

AC.

Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: What works, what does not, and what is needed. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 194–207.

Williams

Vietri

Isherwood

. Symptoms and association with health outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Results of a US patient survey. Mult Scler Int 2014; 2014: 203183.

Wier

Hatcher

Triche

. Effect of robot-assisted versus conventional body-weight-supported treadmill training on quality of life for people with multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48: 483–492.

Tramonti

Fanciullacci

Giunti

. Functional status and quality of life of stroke survivors undergoing rehabilitation programmes in a hospital setting. NeuroRehabilitation 2014; 35: 1–7.

Benedetti

Gasparroni

Stecchi

. Treadmill exercise in early multiple sclerosis: A case series study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 45: 53–59.

Giesser

Beres-Jones

Budovitch

. Locomotor training using body weight support on a treadmill improves mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Mult Scler 2007; 13: 224–231.

Pilutti

Lelli

Paulseth

. Effects of 12 weeks of supported treadmill training on functional ability and quality of life in progressive multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 31–36.

Beer

Aschbacher

Manoglou

. Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized trial. Mult Scler 2008; 14: 231–236.

Triche

EW.

Improving gait in multiple sclerosis using robot-assisted, body weight supported treadmill training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 661–671.

10.

Vaney

Gattlen

Lugon-Moulin

. Robotic-assisted step training (lokomat) not superior to equal intensity of over-ground rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26: 212–221.

11.

Schwartz

Sajin

Moreh

. Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis patients: A randomized trial. Mult Scler 2012; 18: 881–890.

12.

Straudi

Benedetti

Venturini

. Does robot-assisted gait training ameliorate gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis? A pilot randomized-control trial. NeuroRehabilitation 2013; 33: 555–563.

13.

Gandolfi

Geroin

Picelli

. Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 318.

14.

Ruiz

Labas

Triche

. Combination of robot-assisted and conventional body-weight-supported treadmill training improves gait in persons with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2013; 37: 187–193.

15.

McDonald

Compston

Edan

. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 121–127.

16.

Kurtzke

JF.

Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33: 1444–1452.

17.

Rossier

Wade

DT.

Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 9–13.

18.

Goldman

Marrie

Cohen

JA.

Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls. Mult Scler 2008; 14: 383–390.

19.

Berg

Wood-Dauphinee

Williams

. Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992; 83(Suppl. 2): S7–S11.

20.

Podsiadlo

Richardson

The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–148.

21.

Kroenke

Spitzer

Williams

JB.

The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 606–613.

22.

Ware

Sherbourne

. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.

23.

Cohen

Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

24.

Thompson

Overview of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS): Similarities and differences from other forms of MS, diagnostic criteria, pros and cons of progressive diagnosis. Mult Scler 2004; 10: S2–S7.

25.

Campbell

Coulter

Mattison

. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for people with progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Epub ahead of print 14 August 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.022.

26.

Baert

Freeman

Smedal

. Responsiveness and clinically meaningful improvement, according to disability level, of five walking measures after rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A European multicenter study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014; 28: 621–631.

27.

Paltamaa

Sarasoja

Leskinen

. Measures of physical functioning predict self-reported performance in self-care, mobility, and domestic life in ambulatory persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 1649–1657.

28.

Gijbels

Alders

Van Hoof

. Predicting habitual walking performance in multiple sclerosis: Relevance of capacity and self-report measures. Mult Scler 2010; 16: 618–626.

29.

Polman

Rudick

RA.

The multiple sclerosis functional composite: A clinically meaningful measure of disability. Neurology 2010; 74(Suppl. 3): S8–S15.

30.

Gijbels

Dalgas

Romberg

. Which walking capacity tests to use in multiple sclerosis? A multicentre study providing the basis for a core set. Mult Scler 2012; 18: 364–371.

31.

Gervasoni

Cattaneo

Jonsdottir

Effect of treadmill training on fatigue in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Int J Rehabil Res 2014; 37: 54–60.

32.

Amtmann

Bamer

Noonan

. Comparison of the psychometric properties of two fatigue scales in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol 2012; 57: 159–166.

33.

Khan

Turner-Stokes

. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 2: CD006036.