Gait and mobility impairments are common in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), leading to reduced quality of life (QoL).
Objective:
In this randomized controlled study, we tested the effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) and compared it to conventional physiotherapy, measuring walking ability, depression, fatigue, and QoL in patients with progressive MS and severe gait disability.
Methods:
Fifty-two participants (Expanded Disability Status Scale score 6–7) completed the study protocol. They received two sessions/week over 6 weeks of RAGT or conventional walking therapy. Outcome measures were Six-Minute Walk Test, Ten-Meter Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, and Short Form 36. They were performed pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 3 months.
Results:
Walking endurance (p < 0.01) and balance (p < 0.01) were improved among those in the RAGT group. Positive effects on depression in both treatment groups were highlighted. However, only among those in the RAGT group was perceived physical functioning QoL increased. No significant effects on fatigue were found.
Conclusion:
RAGT is a treatment option in progressive MS patients with severe gait impairments to induce short-lasting effects on mobility and QoL.
FeinsteinAFreemanJLoAC.Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: What works, what does not, and what is needed. Lancet Neurol2015; 14: 194–207.
2.
WilliamsAEVietriJTIsherwoodG. Symptoms and association with health outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Results of a US patient survey. Mult Scler Int2014; 2014: 203183.
3.
WierLMHatcherMSTricheEW. Effect of robot-assisted versus conventional body-weight-supported treadmill training on quality of life for people with multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Res Dev2011; 48: 483–492.
4.
TramontiFFanciullacciCGiuntiG. Functional status and quality of life of stroke survivors undergoing rehabilitation programmes in a hospital setting. NeuroRehabilitation2014; 35: 1–7.
5.
BenedettiMGGasparroniVStecchiS. Treadmill exercise in early multiple sclerosis: A case series study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2009; 45: 53–59.
6.
GiesserBBeres-JonesJBudovitchA. Locomotor training using body weight support on a treadmill improves mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Mult Scler2007; 13: 224–231.
7.
PiluttiLALelliDAPaulsethJE. Effects of 12 weeks of supported treadmill training on functional ability and quality of life in progressive multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2011; 92: 31–36.
8.
BeerSAschbacherBManoglouD. Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized trial. Mult Scler2008; 14: 231–236.
9.
LoACTricheEW.Improving gait in multiple sclerosis using robot-assisted, body weight supported treadmill training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2008; 22: 661–671.
10.
VaneyCGattlenBLugon-MoulinV. Robotic-assisted step training (lokomat) not superior to equal intensity of over-ground rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2012; 26: 212–221.
11.
SchwartzISajinAMorehE. Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis patients: A randomized trial. Mult Scler2012; 18: 881–890.
12.
StraudiSBenedettiMGVenturiniE. Does robot-assisted gait training ameliorate gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis? A pilot randomized-control trial. NeuroRehabilitation2013; 33: 555–563.
13.
GandolfiMGeroinCPicelliA. Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci2014; 8: 318.
14.
RuizJLabasMPTricheEW. Combination of robot-assisted and conventional body-weight-supported treadmill training improves gait in persons with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther2013; 37: 187–193.
15.
McDonaldWICompstonAEdanG. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol2001; 50: 121–127.
16.
KurtzkeJF.Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology1983; 33: 1444–1452.
17.
RossierPWadeDT.Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 9–13.
18.
GoldmanMDMarrieRACohenJA.Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls. Mult Scler2008; 14: 383–390.
19.
BergKOWood-DauphineeSLWilliamsJI. Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health1992; 83(Suppl. 2): S7–S11.
20.
PodsiadloDRichardsonS.The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1991; 39: 142–148.
21.
KroenkeKSpitzerRLWilliamsJB.The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med2001; 16: 606–613.
22.
WareJESherbourneCD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care1992; 30: 473–483.
23.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
24.
ThompsonA.Overview of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS): Similarities and differences from other forms of MS, diagnostic criteria, pros and cons of progressive diagnosis. Mult Scler2004; 10: S2–S7.
25.
CampbellECoulterEHMattisonPG. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for people with progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Epub ahead of print 14August2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.022.
26.
BaertIFreemanJSmedalT. Responsiveness and clinically meaningful improvement, according to disability level, of five walking measures after rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A European multicenter study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2014; 28: 621–631.
27.
PaltamaaJSarasojaTLeskinenE. Measures of physical functioning predict self-reported performance in self-care, mobility, and domestic life in ambulatory persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2007; 88: 1649–1657.
28.
GijbelsDAldersGVan HoofE. Predicting habitual walking performance in multiple sclerosis: Relevance of capacity and self-report measures. Mult Scler2010; 16: 618–626.
29.
PolmanCHRudickRA.The multiple sclerosis functional composite: A clinically meaningful measure of disability. Neurology2010; 74(Suppl. 3): S8–S15.
30.
GijbelsDDalgasURombergA. Which walking capacity tests to use in multiple sclerosis? A multicentre study providing the basis for a core set. Mult Scler2012; 18: 364–371.
31.
GervasoniECattaneoDJonsdottirJ.Effect of treadmill training on fatigue in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Int J Rehabil Res2014; 37: 54–60.
32.
AmtmannDBamerAMNoonanV. Comparison of the psychometric properties of two fatigue scales in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol2012; 57: 159–166.
33.
KhanFTurner-StokesLNgL. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007; 2: CD006036.
