Single-subject structural cortical networks in clinically isolated syndrome

Abstract

Background:

Structural cortical networks (SCNs) represent patterns of coordinated morphological modifications in cortical areas, and they present the advantage of being extracted from previously acquired clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. SCNs have shown pathophysiological changes in many brain disorders, including multiple sclerosis.

Objective:

To investigate alterations of SCNs at the individual level in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), thereby assessing their clinical relevance.

Methods:

We analyzed baseline data collected in a prospective multicenter (MAGNIMS) study. CIS patients (n = 60) and healthy controls (n = 38) underwent high-resolution 3T MRI. Measures of disability and cognitive processing were obtained for patients. Single-subject SCNs were extracted from brain 3D-T1 weighted sequences; global and local network parameters were computed.

Results:

Compared to healthy controls, CIS patients showed altered small-world topology, an efficient network organization combining dense local clustering with relatively few long-distance connections. These disruptions were worse for patients with higher lesion load and worse cognitive processing speed. Alterations of centrality measures and clustering of connections were observed in specific cortical areas in CIS patients when compared with healthy controls.

Conclusion:

Our study indicates that SCNs can be used to demonstrate clinically relevant alterations of connectivity in CIS.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging multiple sclerosis clinically isolated syndrome gray matter graph theory structural cortical networks multicenter study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Miller

Chard

Ciccarelli

Clinically isolated syndromes. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 157–169.

Enzinger

Fazekas

Measuring gray matter and white matter damage in MS: Why this is not enough. Front Neurol 2015; 6: 56–54.

Tomassini

Matthews

Thompson

, et al. Neuroplasticity and functional recovery in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2012; 8(11): 635–646.

Maguire

Gadian

Johnsrude

, et al. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97(8): 4398–4403.

Golestani

Paus

Zatorre

RJ.

Anatomical correlates of learning novel speech sounds. Neuron 2002; 35(5): 997–1010.

Lerch

Worsley

Shaw

, et al. Mapping anatomical correlations across cerebral cortex (MACACC) using cortical thickness from MRI. Neuroimage 2006; 31(3): 993–1003.

Chen

Rosa-Neto

, et al. Revealing modular architecture of human brain structural networks by using cortical thickness from MRI. Cereb Cortex 2008; 18(10): 2374–2381.

Tijms

Series

Willshaw

, et al. Similarity-based extraction of individual networks from gray matter MRI scans. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22(7): 1530–1541.

Bassett

Bullmore

Verchinski

, et al. Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and schizophrenia. J Neurosci 2008; 28(37): 9239–9248.

10.

Tijms

Moller

Vrenken

, et al. Single-subject grey matter graphs in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(3): e58921.

11.

Van Duinkerken

Ijzerman

Klein

, et al. Disrupted subject-specific gray matter network properties and cognitive dysfunction in type 1 diabetes patients with and without proliferative retinopathy. Hum Brain Mapp 2016; 37(3): 1194–1208.

12.

Chen

Evans

AC.

Small-world anatomical networks in the human brain revealed by cortical thickness from MRI. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17(10): 2407–2419.

13.

Tewarie

Steenwijk

Tijms

, et al. Disruption of structural and functional networks in long-standing multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35(12): 5946–5961.

14.

Muthuraman

Fleischer

Kolber

, et al. Structural brain network characteristics can differentiate CIS from early RRMS. Front Neurosci 2016; 10: 14–12.

15.

Rimkus

Schoonheim

Steenwijk

, et al. Gray matter networks and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J 2019; 25: 382–391.

16.

Watts

Strogatz

SH.

Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 1998; 393: 440–442.

17.

Hagens

Burggraaff

Kilsdonk

, et al. Impact of 3 Tesla MRI on interobserver agreement in clinically isolated syndrome: A MAGNIMS multicentre study. Mult Scler 2019; 25: 352–360.

18.

Hagens

MHJ

Burggraaff

Kilsdonk

, et al. Three-Tesla MRI does not improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2018; 91: e249–e257.

19.

Rovira Wattjes

ÀMP

Tintore

Tur

, et al. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis-clinical implementation in the diagnostic process. Nat Rev Neurol 2015; 11(8): 471–482.

20.

Thompson

Banwell

Barkhof

, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 162–173.

21.

Sudre

Cardoso

Bouvy

, et al. Bayesian model selection for pathological neuroimaging data applied to white matter lesion segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2015; 34(10): 2079–2102.

22.

Prados

Cardoso

MacManus

, et al. A modality-agnostic patch-based technique for lesion filling in multiple sclerosis. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2014; 17(Pt. 2): 781–788.

23.

Cardoso

Modat

Wolz

, et al. Geodesic information flows: Spatially-variant graphs and their application to segmentation and fusion. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2015; 34(9): 1976–1988.

24.

Klein

Tourville

101 labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol. Front Neurosci 2012; 6: 171.

25.

Kiselev

Hahn

Auer

DP.

Is the brain cortex a fractal?

Neuroimage 2003; 20: 1765–1774.

26.

Rubinov

Sporns

Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010; 52(3): 1059–1069.

27.

Zuo

X-N

Ehmke

Mennes

, et al. Network centrality in the human functional connectome. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22: 1862–1875.

28.

Joyce

Laurienti

Burdette

, et al. A new measure of centrality for brain networks. PLoS ONE 2010; 5(8): e12200.

29.

Bullmore

Sporns

Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10(3): 186–198.

30.

Van Wijk

Stam

Daffertshofer

Comparing brain networks of different size and connectivity density using graph theory. PLoS ONE 2010; 5(10): e13701.

31.

White

A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980; 48: 817–838.

32.

Huber

PJ.

The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Le Cam

Neyman

(eds) Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1967, pp. 221–233.

33.

Genovese

Lazar

Nichols

Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002; 15(4): 870–878.

34.

Afifi

Kotlerman

Ettner

, et al. Methods for improving regression analysis for skewed continuous or counted responses. Annu Rev Public Health 2007; 28: 95–111.

35.

Tintore

Rovira

Rio

, et al. Baseline MRI predicts future attacks and disability in clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 2006; 67(6): 968–972.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.47 MB