Perceived Intergenerational Differences in the Transmission of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in Two Indigenous Groups from Colombia and Guatemala
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online June, 2009
Perceived Intergenerational Differences in the Transmission of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in Two Indigenous Groups from Colombia and Guatemala
This study used the Developmental Niche (DN) framework to examine perceived intergenerational changes in the transmission of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK). Under a cross-sectional and exploratory design, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample, stratified by gender and generation, of 30 Uitoto (Amazon, Colombia) and 26 Itza' Maya (Peten, Guatemala) adults about their perceptions of intergenerational variations in TEK transmission/acquisition practices. Interview data were analyzed using a grounded approach and resulting coding categories were assigned to text units. Grounded themes were then examined in light of the DN components. Both Uitoto and Itza' Maya participants perceived generational changes in the settings (from natural to school settings) and in the strategies (from experiential to conceptual learning) used for TEK transmission. These changes were attributed to various environmental (biodiversity loss, urbanization), socio-cultural (acculturation, changes in social norms) and individual factors (lack of motivation to teach and learn).
Atran, S., Lois, X., & Ucan E.k', E. (2004). Plants of the Peten Itza' Maya. Memoirs of the University of Michigan Museum, 38. Ann Arbor, MI: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
2.
Atran, S., Medin, D., Ross, N., Lynch, E., Coley, J., Ucan Ek', E., et al. (1999). Folkecology and commons management in the Maya lowlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 96, 7598-7603.
3.
Atran, S., Medin, D., Ross, N., Lynch, E., Vapnarsky, V., Ucan Ek', E., et al. (2002). Folkecology, cultural epidemiology, and the spirit of the commons: A garden experiment in the Maya lowlands, 1991-2001 . Current Anthropology, 43, 421-450.
Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia and London: Taylor & Francis.
6.
Cohen, D. (2001). Cultural variation: Considerations and implications . Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 451-471.
7.
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation . Ambio, 22, 151-156.
8.
Gomez, A., Lesmes, A.C., & Rocha, C. (1995). Caucherias y conflicto Colombo-Peruano: Testimonios 1904-1934. Bogota: Disloque Editores .
9.
Greenfield, P.M. (2000). Culture and universals: Integrating social and cognitive development. In L.P. Nucci, G.B. Saxe, & E. Turiel (Eds.), Culture, Thought, and Development (pp. 231-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Greenfield, P.M., & Lave, J. (1982). Cognitive aspects of informal education. In D. Wagner & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on child development . San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
11.
Greenfield, P.M., Maynard, A.E., & Childs, C.P. (2000). History, culture, learning and development. Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science , 34, 351-374.
12.
Jones, G.D. (1998). The conquest of the last Maya kingdom. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
13.
Kim, U., Park, Y., & Park, D. (2000). The challenge of cross-cultural psychology: The role of indigenous psychologies. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 31, 63-75.
14.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.
15.
Maffi, L. (2001). On the interdependence of biological and cultural diversity (Introduction). In L. Maffi (Ed.), On biocultural diversity: Linking language, knowledge and the environment. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
16.
Medin, D., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development across cultures. Psychological Review , 4, 960-983.
17.
Oskamp, S. (2007). Applying psychology to help save the world: Reflections on a career in psychology. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 121-136.
18.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Pineda, R. (2000). Holocausto en el Amazonas: Una historia social de la Casa Arana. Bogota: Planeta .
20.
Posey, D.A. (1983). Folk apiculture of the Kayapo Indians of Brazil . Biotropica, 15, 154-158.
21.
Ross, N. (2002). Lacandon Maya intergenerational change and the erosion of folk biological knowledge. In J.R. Stepp, F.S. Wyndham, & R.K. Zarger (Eds.), Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology . Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
22.
Segal, M.H., Dasen, P.R., Berry, J.W., & Poortinga, Y.H. (1999). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
23.
Super, C.M., & Harkness, S. (1986). The developmental niche: A conceptualization at the interface of child and culture. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 545-570.
24.
Super, C.M., & Harkness, S. (1997). The cultural structuring of child development . In J.W. Berry, P.R. Dasen & T.S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1-39). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
United Nations Environmental Program. (2007 ). Convention on biological diversity: Traditional knowledge and the convention for biological diversity. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/traditional/intro.shtml.
27.
United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII). (2005). Report of technical workshop on indigenous traditional knowledge (UN Publication No. 05-64614 (E). Available at: http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/646/14/PDF/N0564614.pdf?OpenElement
28.
Warren, D.M., Slikkerveer, L.J., & Brokensha, D. (1995). The cultural dimension of development: Indigenous knowledge systems. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
29.
Zent, S. (2001). Acculturation and ethnobotanical knowledge loss among the Piaroa of Venezuela: Demonstration of a quantitative method for the empirical study of traditional ecological knowledge change. In L. Maffi (Ed.), On biocultural diversity: Linking language, knowledge and the environment. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
