Commentary: Opening Up Perspectives on Autonomy and Relatedness in Parent—Children Dynamics: Anthropological Insights

Abstract

Many studies have shown widely varying human child-rearing practices; no child is ever a tabula rasa in the eyes of the culture. The article by McShane et al. (2009) on parenting themes of autonomy and relatedness among Inuit migrants from the northern countryside to Ottawa, a medium-sized city and the capital of Canada, offers important findings on previously less-studied child-rearing among Inuit in that southern urban setting. More broadly, the article contributes insights into how child-rearing practices and beliefs reflect local conceptions of the person and the world, and how the child should be prepared to live in it. Issues raised here include the challenges of distinguishing among cultural, psychological, and political economic influences of migration, urbanization, and globalization, and delineating the ways in which intimate personal concepts interweave with wider forces in child-rearing. Also at issue are definitions of relatedness and autonomy, concepts which are widely deployed in cross-cultural studies of child-rearing, but which are based upon Western philosophical formulations, and which McShane et al. analyze in the Inuit urban case. These concepts are difficult to formulate in culture-’neutral’ or ‘etic’ terms. The article shows both the uses and the limitations of retaining analytical ‘odd-job’ concepts for heuristic purposes. The present commentary argues that it is necessary to deconstruct critically such concepts as relatedness and autonomy, and to approach them as tendencies contingent upon context, rather than as universal polarized basic needs.

Keywords

child-rearing enculturation Inuit life course/cycle parenting urbanization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aries, P. ( 1962). Centuries of childhood. New York: Vintage.

Briggs, J.L. ( 1985). Socialization, family conflicts and responses to culture change among Canadian Inuit. Arctic Medical Research, 40, 40-52.

Briggs, J.L. ( 1995). Vicissitudes of attachment: Nurturance and dependence in Canadian Inuit family relationships, old and new. Arctic Medical Research, 54(Suppl. 1), 24-32.

Bruner, J. ( 2000). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cartry, C. ( 1978). Jeux d’enfants Gourmanche. In Systemes de signes. Textes reunis en hommage a Germaine Dieterlen (pp. 73-78). Paris : Hermann.

Chudacoff, H. ( 1989). How old are you? Age consciousness in American culture . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cole, J. , & Durham, D. (Eds.). (2007). Generations and globalization: Youth, age, and family in the new world economy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Comaroff, J. , & Comaroff, J. ( 1991). Of revelation and revolution: Christianity, colonialism, and consciousness in South Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Croll, E. ( 1990). The social construction of parenthood in the People’s Republic of China. In P. Spencer (Ed.), Anthropology and the riddle of the Sphinx: Paradoxes of change in the life course (pp. 147-156). London and New York: Routledge.

10.

Elias, N. ( 1978). The civilizing process: The development of manners. New York: Urizen Books.

11.

Fass, P. ( 1977). The damned and the beautiful: American youth in the 1920’s . New York: Oxford University Press .

12.

Fortes, M. ( 1987). Religion, morality, and the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Gottlieb, A. ( 2004). The afterlife is where we come from. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

14.

Gottlieb, A. , & Deloache, J. ( 2000). A world of babies: Imagined childcare guides for seven societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Hecht, T. ( 2002). Introduction. In T. Hecht (Ed.), Minor omissions: Children in Latin American history and society (pp. 3-30). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

16.

Jackson, M. , & Karp, I. ( 1990). Personhood and agency in Africa. Washington, DC and Stockholm: Smithsonian Institution Press.

17.

Kagitcibasi, C. ( 2005). Autonomy and relatedness in a cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 36(4), 403-422.

18.

Levine, R. ( 1980a). A cross-cultural perspective on parenting. In M. Fantini & R. Cardenas (Eds.), Parenting in a multi-cultural society (pp. 17-27). New York: Longman.

19.

Levine, R. ( 1980b). Adulthood among the Gusii of Kenya. In N. Smerser & E. Erikson (Eds.), Themes of work and love in adulthood (pp. 77-105). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

20.

Levine, R. , & Schweder, R. (Eds). (1984). Cultural theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

McShane, K.E. , Hastings, P.D. , Smylie, J.K. , Prince, C. , & Tungasuvvingat Inuit Family Resource Centre. (2009). Examining evidence for autonomy and relatedness in urban Inuit parenting. Culture & Psychology, 15(4), 411-431.

22.

Mull, D. , & Mull, J. ( 1987). Infanticide among the Tarahumara. In N. Scheper-Hughes (Ed.), Child survival: Anthropological perspectives on the treatment and maltreatment of children (pp. 113-132). Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

23.

Nicolaisen, I. , & Nicolaisen, J. (1997). The pastoral Tuareg. Copenhagen: Rhodos.

24.

Ottenberg, S. ( 1982). Boys’ secret societies in Afikpo. In S. Ottenberg (Ed.), African religious groups and beliefs (pp. 170-184). Cupertino, CA: Folklore Institute.

25.

Rabain, J. ( 1979). L’Enfant du lignage: Du sevrage a la classe d’age chez les Wolof du Senegal. Paris: Payot.

26.

Rasmussen, S. ( 1997). The poetics and politics of Tuareg aging: life course and personal destiny in Niger. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.

27.

Rasmussen, S. ( 2006). Those who touch: Tuareg medicine women in anthropological perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Riesman, P. ( 1986). The person and the life cycle in African social life and thought. The African Studies Review, 29(2), 71-138.

29.

Rogoff, B. ( 2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

30.

Rothbaum, F. , & Trommsdorff, G. (2007). Do roots and wings complement or oppose one another? The socialization of relatedness and autonomy in cultural context. In J.E. Grusec & P.D. Hastings (Eds.), The handbook of socialization (pp. 461-489). New York: The Guilford Press.

31.

Scheper-Hughes, N. (Ed.). (1987). Child survival: Anthropological perspectives on the treatment and maltreatment of children. Boston, MA: Reidel .

32.

Sprott, J.E. ( 1994). One person’s ‘spoiling’ is another ’s freedom to become: Overcoming ethnocentric views about parental control . Social Science and Medicine, 38, 1111-1124.

33.

Vitoria, F. ( 1991). On the American Indians. In A. Pagden & J. Lawrance (Eds.), Vitoria: Political writings (pp. 231-292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Wohl, R. ( 1979). The generation of 1914. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

35.

Yamagishi, T. ( 2002). The structure of trust: An evolutionary game of mind and society. Hokkaido Behavioral Science Report, SP- 13, 1-157.