This paper explores undocumented migrants’ deaths, known as border-deaths, in the Mediterranean Sea by adopting liminality theory to memory and border concepts. Bordering, securitizing, externalizing, and militarizing policies have transformed the Mediterranean into the southern border of Europe. Consequently, the Sea has become a submerged cemetery where thousands of people have lost their lives. Particularly, the Italian Island of Lampedusa has become a geopolitical fiat boundary where conflicting securitarian/humanitarian symbolic frameworks compete. The death of migrants has been an ongoing historical issue, resulting a permanent state of liminality. Using empirical data collected through semi-structured interviews and participant observations in Lampedusa, this study aims to understand the cultural psychological dimension of memory from the experiential standpoint of Lampedusans citizens and community. The findings reveal three themes: the primacy of experience, the relational diffidence, and the memorialization/mourning practices act as subjective and collective forms of resistance subverting external oppressing narratives. Moreover, they also serve to differentiate mourners from spectators and to preserve the material functioning of the Lampedusan community by replicating the symbolic order holding it together. Finally, implications for a semiotic-cultural psychological and liminality theory of memory and border studies are discussed.
AlbahariM. (2015). Crimes of peace: Mediterranean migrations at the world’s deadliest border. University of Pennsylvania Press.
2.
AlexanderJ. C. (2012). Trauma: A social theory. John Wiley and Sons.
3.
Bachiller LopezC. (2022). Border policing at sea: Tactics, routines, and the law in a frontex patrol boat. British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac009
4.
BalibarE. (2009). Europe as borderland. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(2), 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13008
5.
BarnesJ. (2022). Torturous journeys: Cruelty, international law, and pushbacks and pullbacks over the Mediterranean Sea. Review of International Studies, 48(3), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000110
6.
BartlettF. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
7.
BigoD. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the Governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(1_suppl), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270s105
8.
BrambillaC.JonesR. (2020). Rethinking borders, violence, and conflict: From sovereign power to borderscapes as sites of struggles. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819856352
ButlerJ. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
12.
ByfordJ. (2018). The emotional and political power of images of suffering: Discursive psychology and the study of visual rhetoric. In GibsonS. (Ed), Discourse, peace, and conflict. Peace psychology book series (pp. 285–302). Springer.
13.
Casas-CortesM.CobarrubiasS.De GenovaN.GarelliG.GrappiG.HellerC.HessS.KasparekB.MezzadraS.NeilsonB.PeanoI.PezzaniL.PicklesJ.RaholaF.RiednerL.ScheelS.TazzioliM. (2015). New keywords: Migration and borders. Cultural Studies, 29(1), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2014.891630
CorsoA. (2023). The smell of bare death: Encountering life at the graveyard of Lampedusa. Anthropological Theory, 23(3), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996221128104
16.
CusumanoE.GombeerK. (2020). In deep waters: The legal, humanitarian and political implications of closing Italian ports to migrant rescuers. Mediterranean Politics, 25(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2018.1532145
17.
CuttittaP. (2012). Lo spettacolo del confine: Lampedusa tra produzione e messa in scena della frontiera [The spectacle of the frontier. Lampedusa between production and enaction of frontier. Mimesis.
18.
CuttittaP.LastT. (Eds), (2019). Border deaths: Causes, dynamics and consequences of migration-related mortality. Amsterdam University Press.
19.
DanewidI. (2017). White innocence in the black mediterranean: Hospitality and the erasure of history. Third World Quarterly, 38(7), 1674–1689. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1331123
20.
DegeM.StrasserI. (Eds), (2021). Global pandemics and epistemic crises in psychology. Routledge.
De GenovaN. (2013). Spectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(7), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.783710
23.
De Luca PicioneR.FredaM. F. (2015). Borders and modal articulations. Semiotic constructs of sensemaking processes enabling a fecund dialogue between cultural psychology and clinical psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9318-2
24.
de Saint-LaurentC.Brescó de LunaI.AwadS. H.WagonerB. (2017). Collective memory and social sciences in the post-truth era. Culture and Psychology, 23(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x17695769
25.
De VincenzoC.ModugnoR.StoccoN. (2023). The evidence-based paradigm in contemporary psychology: A historical and cultural understanding of evidence-based as a contemporary dynamic between social systems of knowledge production and application. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09798-5
26.
De VincenzoC.SerioF.FranceschiA.BarbagalloS.ZamperiniA. (2022). A “Viral epistolary” and psychosocial spirituality: Restoring transcendental meaning during COVID-19 through a digital community letter-writing project. Pastoral Psychology, 71(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-021-00991-0
EatoughV.SmithJ. (2017). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. The Sage Handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 193–209). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555
29.
ErllA.NunningA. (Eds), (2008). Cultural memory studies: An international and interdisciplinary handbook. Walter de Gruyter.
30.
EspañolA.MarsicoG. (2021). Psychology of borders: An integral proposal to understand border phenomena in human life. Theory and Psychology, 31(5), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211026756
GoodmanS.SirriyehA.McMahonS. (2017). The evolving (re)categorisations of refugees throughout the “refugee/migrant crisis”. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2302
33.
GrecoM.StennerP. (2017). From paradox to pattern shift: Conceptualising liminal hotspots and their affective dynamics. Theory and Psychology, 27(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317693120
34.
Gutiérrez RodríguezE. (2018). Political subjectivity, transversal mourning and a caring common: Responding to deaths in the Mediterranean. Critical African Studies, 10(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2019.1610010
35.
HalbwachsM. (1950). La mémoire collective. Presses Universitaires de France.
36.
HellerC.PécoudA. (2020). Counting migrants’ deaths at the border: From civil society counterstatistics to (Inter)Governmental recuperation. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219882996
37.
HobsbawmE.RangerT. (Eds), (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press.
38.
HorstiK.NeumannK. (2019). Memorializing mass deaths at the border: Two cases from Canberra (Australia) and Lampedusa (Italy). Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1394477
39.
HowittD. (2010). Introduction to qualitative methods in psychology. Prentice Hall.
40.
KlempeS. H. (2016). A philosophical vs. a psychological perspective on borders. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9333-3
41.
KovrasI. (2017). Grassroots activism and the evolution of transitional justice: The families of the disappeared. Cambridge University Press.
42.
KovrasI.RobinsS. (2016). Death as the border: Managing missing migrants and unidentified bodies at the EU's Mediterranean frontier. Political Geography, 55, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.05.003
43.
LastT.MirtoG.UlusoyO.UrquijoI.HarteJ.BamiN.SpijkerboerT. (2017). Deaths at the borders database: Evidence of deceased migrants’ bodies found along the southern external borders of the European union. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(5), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1276825
44.
Le GoffJ. (1992). History and memory. Columbia University Press.
45.
LittleM.JordensC. F. C.PaulK.MontgomeryK.PhilipsonB. (1998). Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science and Medicine, 47(10), 1485–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00248-2
MarsicoG. (2011). The ‘‘non-cuttable’’ space in between: Context, boundaries and their natural fluidity. IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9164-9
MarsicoG.VarziA. C. (2016). Psychological and social borders: Regulating relationships. In ValsinerJ.MarsicoG.ChaudharyN.SatoT.DazzaniV. (Eds), Psychology as the science of human being. Annals of Theoretical Psychology (vol. 13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_19
MezzadraS. (2020). Abolitionist vistas of the human. Border struggles, migration and freedom of movement. Citizenship Studies, 24(4), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1755156
MüllerP.SlominskiP. (2021). Breaking the legal link but not the law? The externalization of EU migration control through orchestration in the central mediterranean. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(6), 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1751243
56.
NailT. (2016). Theory of the border. Oxford University Press.
NewmanD. (2006b). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our `borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
60.
OlickJ. K.Vinitzky-SeroussiV.LevyD. (2011). The collective memory reader. Oxford University Press.
61.
PécoudA. (2020). Death at the border: Revisiting the debate in light of the euro-mediterranean migration crisis. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(4), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219882987
62.
PuggioniR. (2018). Border politics, right to life and acts of dissensus: Voices from the Lampedusa borderland. Third World Quarterly, 36(6), 1145–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1047199
63.
RicoeurP. (2009). Memory, history, forgetting. University of Chicago Press.
64.
RygielK. (2016). Dying to live: Migrant deaths and citizenship politics along European borders: Transgressions, disruptions, and mobilizations. Citizenship Studies, 20(5), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2016.1182682
65.
SalvatoreS.ValsinerJ.VeltriG. A. (2019). The theoretical and methodological framework. Semiotic cultural psychology, symbolic universes and lines of semiotic forces. In SalvatoreS.FiniV.MannariniT.ValsinerJ.VeltriG. (Eds), Symbolic universes in time of (Post)Crisis. Culture in policy making: The symbolic universes of social action. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_2
66.
SchimanskiJ.WolfeS. (2010). Cultural production and negotiation of borders: Introduction to the Dossier. Journal of borderlands studies, 25(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2010.9695749
SmithB.VarziA. C. (2000). Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60(2), 401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2653492
69.
SpijkerboerT. P. (2013). Are European states accountable for border deaths? In JussS. (Ed), Research companion to migration law and theory (pp. 61–76). Ashgate.
70.
SquireV. (2016). Governing migration through death in Europe and the US: Identification, burial and the crisis of modern humanism. European Journal of International Relations, 23(3), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116668662
71.
StamH. (2011). Wicked problems and the construction of theory in psychology. In StennerP.CrombyJ.MotzkauJ.YenJ. (Eds), Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges (pp. 2–12). Captus Press.
72.
SteinhilperE.GruijtersR. (2018). A contested crisis: Policy narratives and empirical evidence on border deaths in the Mediterranean. Sociology, 52(3), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/dn7a5
73.
StennerP. (2017). Liminality and experience. A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan.
74.
StennerP. (2021). Theorising liminality between art and life. In WagonerB.ZittounT. (Eds), Experience on the edge: Theorizing liminality. Theory and history in the human and social sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83171-4_1
75.
StennerP.Moreno-GabrielE. (2013). Liminality and affectivity: The case of deceased organ donation. Subjectivity, 6(3), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.9
76.
StevensonO.KentenC.MaddrellA. (2016). And now the end is near: Enlivening and politizising the geographies of dying, death and mourning. Social and Cultural Geography, 17(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1152396
StrasserI.DegeM. (Eds), (2021). The psychology of global crises and crisis politics: Intervention, resistance, decolonization. Springer.
80.
StraubJ. (2008). Psychology, narrative, and cultural memory: Past and present. Cultural memory studies an international and interdisciplinary handbook (pp. 215–228). Walter de Gruyter.
SzakolczaiA. (2014). Living permanent Liminality: The recent transition experience in Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology, 22(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.7227/ijs.22.1.3
83.
TateoL.EspañolA.KullaseppK.MarsicoG.PalangH. (2018). Five gazes on the border: A collective auto-ethnographic writing. Human Arenas, 1(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0010-1
TeoT. (2015). Critical psychology: A geography of intellectual engagement and resistance. American Psychologist, 70(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038727
TriulziA. (2016). Working with migrants’ memories in Italy: The Lampedusa dump. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 7(2), 149–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc.7.2.149_1
88.
TurnerV. (1986). On the edge of the Bush: Anthropology as experience. University of Arizona Press.
ValsinerJ. (2020). Where Occidental science went wrong: Failing to see systemic unity in diversity. Psychology & Developing Societies, 32(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333620903880
91.
ValsinerJ.RosaA. (2007). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. Cambridge University Press.
92.
Van HoutumH.Van NaerssenT. (2002). Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00189
93.
VolkanV. D. (2018). Immigrants and refugees: Trauma, perennial mourning, prejudice, and border psychology. Routledge.
94.
WagonerB. (2015). Collective remembering as a process of social representation. In SammutG.AndreouliE.GaskellG.ValsinerJ. (Eds), The cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 143–162). Cambridge University Press.
WertschJ. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge University Press.
97.
WertschJ. V.RoedigerH. L. (2008). Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches. Memory, 16(3), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801434
98.
WieviorkaA. (1998). The Era of witness. Cornell University Press.
99.
WilligC.Stainton-RogersW. (Eds), (2008). The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Sage Publications.
100.
WinterJ. (2001). The generation of memory: Reflections on the “Memory Boom” in contemporary historical studies. Canadian Military History, 10(3), 57–66. https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol10/iss3/5/
101.
WinterJ. (2006). Notes on the memory boom. In BellD. (Ed), Memory, trauma and world politics (54-83). Palgrave Macmillan.
102.
ZamperiniA.PassarellaL. (2019). Testimony of terrorism: Civic Responsibility and memory work after a political massacre. Memory Studies, 12(6), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017720255
