Cultural People and Cultural Contexts: Comments on Cole (1995) and Wertsch (1995)

Abstract

The issue of 'cultural relativism' that has framed much of cross-cultural psychology or social and cultural anthropology poses interesting problems which are analysed as triggered by the papers by Cole (1995) and Wertsch (1995). Cultural psychology may benefit from a consistent assertion that people are basically the same, that they have the same basic cognitive processes, despite different forms of cultural experience. This, of course, supposes an ontological distinction between mind and society.

Comparing cultures in terms of manifest performance of persons may be a misguided venture based on essentially unproductive concepts of both mind and culture. In the approach offered here, /culture' becomes conceived as the process that transforms individuals in social, institutional and historical contexts just as much as it is the process whereby individuals transform those contexts; it is the process whereby universal historical constraints make the development of mind possible

Keywords

culture as transformation generativity individualism relativity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Brighton: Harvester.

Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.

Cohen, G.A. (1978). Karl Marx's theory of history: A defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cole, M. (1978). Ethnographic psychology of cognition-so far. In G.D. Spindler (Ed.), The making of psychological anthropology (pp. 614-636). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Cole, M. (1988). Cross-cultural research in the socio-historical tradition. Human Development, 31, 137-152.

Cole, M. (1995). Culture and cognitive development: From cross-cultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Culture & Psychology, 1(1), 25-54.

Cole, M. , & Bruner, J. (1971). Cultural differences and inferences about cultural processes. American Psychologist, 26, 867-876.

Cole, M. , Gay, J. , Glick, J. , & Sharp, D. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking. London: Methuen.

Gay, J. , & Cole, M. (1967). The new mathematics and an old culture: A study of learning among the Kpelle of Liberia. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

10.

Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition . (1982). Culture and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Lukes, S. (1970). Methodological individualism reconsidered. In A. Ryan (Ed.), The philosophy of the social sciences. London: Macmillan.

12.

Lukes, S. (1973). Individualism. Oxford: Blackwell.

13.

Luria, A.R. (1934). The second psychological expedition to Central Asia. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 44, 255-259.

14.

Luria, A.R. (1971). Towards the problem of the historical nature of psychological processes. International Journal of Psychology, 6, 259-272.

15.

Luria, A.R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Miller, R. (1984). Reflections of mind and culture: Inaugural lecture. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.

17.

Miller, R. (1989). Critical psychology: A territorial imperative. Psychology in Society, 12, 3-18.

18.

Miller, R. , & Craig, A.P. (1985). Cognitive development and social change: Theoretical issues. In I.R. Lagunes & Y. Poortinga (Eds.), From a different perspective: Studies of behavior across cultures. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

19.

Moll, I. (1994a). Reclaiming the natural line in Vygotsky's theory of cognitive development. Human Development, 27(6), 333-342.

20.

Moll, I. (1994b). 'School was far away': The formal perceptions, classifications and syllogistic reasoning of Kokwane Ndlovu. Perspectives in Education, 15(2), 189-217.

21.

Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

22.

Wertsch, J.V. (1995). Sociocultural research in the copyright age. Culture & Psychology, 1(1), 81-102.