The dynamics of cross-cultural psychology derive from the basic dilemma between the etic and the emic approach. Following a critique of the two approaches, I attempt to resolve the tension between the two approaches by presenting a conceptual framework called the triarchic resonance principle. This principle explicitly takes the dynamic relationship between culture, individual and ecological task demands into account. This dynamic relationship is exhibited by three different perspectives of temporal development—ontogenetic development, cultural change and microgenetic development of ecological task demands—which are integrated into a common model. The conceptual framework is illustrated with examples from research on intelligence and perception.
Boesch, E.E.
(1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin: Springer.
5.
Bornstein, M.H.
(1975). The influence of visual perception on culture. American Anthropologist, 77, 774–798.
6.
Braida, L.D.
& Durlach, N.I. (1972). Intensity perception II: Resolution in oneinterval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 483–502.
7.
Cronbach, L.J.
(1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Durham, W.H.
(1990). Advances in evolutionary culture theory. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 187–210.
9.
Eccles, J.C.
(1989). Evolution of the brain: Creation of the self. London: Routledge.
10.
Edwards, A.L.
(1971). Versuchsplanung in der psychologischen Forschung. Weinheim: Beltz.
11.
Eimas, P.D. (1990). Sprachwahrnehmung beim S®augling. In Gehirn und Kognition(pp. 120–127). Heidelberg: Spektrum der Wissenschaft.
12.
Eimas, P.D.
(1994). Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Development, 65, 903–917.
13.
Gergen, K.J.
(1985). Social constructionist inquiry: Context and implications. In K.J. Gergen & K.E. Davis (Eds.), The social construction of the person(pp. 3–18). New York: Springer.
14.
Hawkins, S.A.
, & Hastie, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311–327.
15.
Helfrich, H. (1991). Zur Universalit®at von Lautunterscheidungen. In J. Blauert & E. Paulus (Eds.), Fortschritte der Akustik—DAGA ‘91(pp. 1021–1024). Bad Honnef: DPG-GmbH.
16.
Helfrich, H. (1993). Methodologie kulturvergleichender Forschung. In A. Thomas (Ed.), Kulturvergleichende Psychologie(pp. 81–102). G ®ottingen: Hogrefe.
17.
Helfrich, H. (1996). Soziale Handlungsmuster im Vergleich zwischen Japan und Deutschland. In G. Trommsdorf & H.-J. Kornadt (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche und individuelle Entwicklung in Japan und Deutschland(pp. 319–330). Konstanz: Universit®atsverlag Konstanz.
18.
Helfrich, H.
(1999). Human reliability from a social-psychological perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50,193–212.
19.
Hesse, H.-G. (1988). Methodische Probleme des Kulturvergleichs psychometrischer Daten und M ®oglichkeit ihrer Bearbeitung durch Strukturgleichungsmodelle. Zeitschrift f ®ur internationale erziehungs- und sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung, 8, 119–140.
20.
Hofstede, G.
(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in workrelated values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Inkeles, A.
, & Smith, D.H. (1974). Becoming modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Kagitcibasi, C.
, & Berry, J.W. (1989). Cross-cultural psychology: Current research and trends. Annual Review of Psychology, 493–531.
23.
Kroeber, A.L.
(1917). The superorganic. American Anthroplogist, 19, 163–213.
24.
Kroeber, A.L.
, & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions(Vol. 47, No. 1). Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum.
25.
Lloyd Morgan, C.
(1903). An introduction to comparative psychology(2nd ed.). London: Walter Scott.
26.
Lonner, W.J.
, & Adamopoulus, J. (1996). Culture as antecedent to behavior. In W. Berry, Y.H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method(2nd ed., pp. 43–83). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
Macmillan, N.A.
, & Creelman, C.D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Malinowski, B.
(1927). Sex and repression in savage society. London: Kegan Paul.
29.
Matsumoto, D.
(1996). Culture and psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30.
McGovern, K.
, & Strange, W. (1977). The perception of /r/ and /l/ in syllable-initial and syllable-final position. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 162–170.
31.
McNicol, D.
(1972). A primer of signal detection theory. London: Allen & Unwin.
32.
Miyawaki, K.
, Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A.M., Jenkins, J.J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 331–340.
33.
M ®ohwald, U. (1996). Wertewandel in Japan: Einige Aspekte der Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojektes des Deutschen Instituts f ®ur Japanstudien. In G. Trommsdorf & H.-J. Kornadt (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche und individuelle Entwicklung in Japan und Deutschland(pp. 169–188). Konstanz: Universit®atsverlag Konstanz.
34.
Paulhus, D.L.
(1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleitner & J.S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires(pp. 143–165). Berlin: Springer.
35.
Pettigrew, T.F.
, & van de Vijver, F.J.R. (1990). Thinking both bigger and smaller: Finding the basic level for cross-cultural psychology. In P.J.D. Drenth, J.A. Sergeant, & R.J. Takens (Eds.), European perspectives in psychology(Vol. 3, pp. 339–353). Chichester: Wiley.
36.
Pike, K.L.
(1954). Emic and etic standpoints for the description of behavior. In K.L. Pike (Ed.), Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior(pp. 8–28). Glendale, IL: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
37.
Pike, K.L.
(1967) Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.
38.
Poortinga, Y. H.
, Kop, P.F.M., & van de Vijver, F.J.R. (1990). Differences between psychological domains in the range of cross-cultural variation. In P.J.D.Drenth, J.A. Sergeant, & R.J. Takens (Eds.), European perspectives in psychology(Vol. 3, pp. 355–376). Chichester: Wiley.
39.
Poortinga, Y.H.
, & van de Flier, H. (1988). The meaning of item bias in ability tests. In S. Irvine & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context(pp. 166–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Rasmussen, J.
(1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction. Amsterdam: North Holland.
41.
Reason, J.
(1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Scribner, S.
(1985). Vygotsky’s uses of history. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskyan perspectives(pp. 119–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Segall, M.H.
, Dasen, P.R., Berry, J.W., & Poortinga, Y.H. (1990). Human behavior in global perspective. New York: Pergamon Press.
44.
Shiffrin, R.M.
, & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
45.
Sternberg, R.J.
(1988). A triarchic view of intelligence in cross-cultural perspective. In S.H. Irvine & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context(pp. 60–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Valsiner, J.
(1989). Human development and culture. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
47.
Valsiner, J.
(1994). What is ‘natural’ about ‘natural contexts’? Cultural construction of human development (and its study). Infancia y Aprendizaje, 66, 11–19.
