Different scholars count `the number of parties' in different ways, partly because they examine different parts of the political process and for different reasons. Sartori's qualitative approach focused mainly on competition for government, but is now largely supplanted by the quantitative `effective number of parties' index, which deals with votes and seats. But some quantitative research requires us to look beyond votes and seats. For example, testing proportional and pluralitarian models of democracy requires us to count parties not just in terms of votes and seats but also in terms of legislative and cabinet power. I estimate party shares of legislative and cabinet power to test democratic norms at British and German elections and parliaments. So, the effective number of parties index needs to be, and can be, extended beyond votes and seats alone.
Blau, Adrian (2004) `A Quadruple Whammy for First-Past-the-Post' , Electoral Studies23: 431—53.
2.
Blau, Adrian (2005) ` The New Three-Party Politics? ' Paper delivered at the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties annual conference, University of Essex, 9—11 September 2005.
3.
Blondel, Jean (1968) `Party Systems and Patterns of Government in Western Democracies' , Canadian Journal of Political Science1: 180—203.
4.
Bowler, Shaun , Todd Donovan and Jennifer van Heerde (2005) `The United States of America: Perpetual Campaigning in the Absence of Competition', in Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell (eds) The Politics of Electoral Systems, pp. 185—205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
Butler, David (1983) Governing Without a Majority: Dilemmas for Hung Parliaments in Britain. London: Collins.
6.
Butler, David and Gareth Butler (2000) Twentieth Century British Political Facts 1900—2000 . Basingstoke: Macmillan.
7.
Drucker, H.M. (1979) `Two-Party Politics in Britain', in H. M. Drucker (ed.) MultiParty Britain, pp. 1—22. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
8.
Dumont, Patrick and Jean-François Caulier (2005) `The “Effective Number of Relevant Parties”: How Voting Power Improves Laakso—Taagepera's Index'. Working paper available at: http://centres.fusl.ac.be/CEREC/document/people/caulier/enrp.pdf.
9.
Dunleavy, Patrick (1999) `Electoral Representation and Accountability: the Legacy of Empire', in Ian Holliday , Andrew Gamble and Geraint Parry (eds) Fundamentals in British Politics, pp. 204—30. New York: St Martin's Press.
10.
Dunleavy, Patrick (2002) `Elections and Party Politics', in Patrick Dunleavy , Andrew Gamble , Richard Heffernan , Ian Holliday and Gillian Peele (eds) Developments in British Politics 6, rev. edn, pp. 127—50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
Dunleavy, Patrick (2005) `Facing up to Multi-Party Politics: How Partisan Dealignment and PR Voting Have Fundamentally Changed Britain's Party Systems' , Parliamentary Affairs58: 503—32.
12.
Dunleavy, Patrick and Françoise Boucek (2003) `Constructing the Number of Parties' , Party Politics9: 291—315.
13.
Dunleavy, Patrick and Helen Margetts (1994) `The Experiential Approach to Auditing Democracy ', in David Beetham (ed.) Defining and Measuring Democracy, pp. 155—81. London : Sage.
14.
Dunleavy, Patrick and Helen Margetts (2001) `From Majoritarian to Pluralist Democracy? Electoral Reform in Britain Since 1997' , Journal of Theoretical Politics13: 295—319.
15.
Duverger, Maurice (1964) Political Parties, 3rd edn. London: Methuen.
16.
Epstein, Leon (1964) `A Comparative Study of Canadian Parties' , American Political Science Review58: 46—59.
17.
Felsenthal, Dan and Moshé Machover (2004) `A Priori Voting Power: What Is It All About?' , Political Studies Review2: 1—23.
18.
Gallagher, Michael and Paul Mitchell (eds) (2005) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Grofman, Bernard , Alessandro Chiaramonte , Roberto D'Alimonte and Scott Feld (2004) ` Comparing and Contrasting the Use of Two Graphical Tools for Displaying Patterns of Multiparty Competition: Nagayama Diagrams and Simplex Representations ', Party Politics10: 273—99.
20.
Hermens, Ferdinand (1951) Europe Between Democracy and Anarchy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
21.
Jones, Mark (1995) Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
22.
Katz, Richard (1997) Democracy and Elections. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
23.
Laakso, Markku and Rein Taagepera (1979) `“Effective” Number of Parties: a Measure with Application to West Europe' , Comparative Political Studies12: 3—27.
24.
Laver, Michael and Ben Hunt (1982) Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.
25.
Laver, Michael and Norman Schofield (1998) Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
26.
Lijphart, Arend (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Lowell, Lawrence (1904) Governments and Parties in Continental Europe, vol. I. London: Longmans.
28.
Molinar, Juan (1991) `Counting the Number of Parties: an Alternative Index' , American Political Science Review85: 1383—91.
29.
Nagel, Jack (1998) `Social Choice in a Pluralitarian Democracy: The Politics of Market Liberalization in New Zealand' , British Journal of Political Science28: 223—67.
30.
Norris, Pippa (1997) Electoral Change in Britain Since 1945. Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
Pinto-Duschinsky, Michael (1999) ` Send the Rascals Packing: Defects of Proportional Representation and the Virtues of the Westminster Model ', Representation36: 117—26.
32.
Powell, G. Bingham (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
Powell, G. Bingham (2001) `Response to Comments of Erik Moberg'. Available at: http://www.mobergpublications.se/positions/powellp.pdf .
34.
Powell, G. Bingham (2006) ` Election Laws and Representative Governments: Beyond Votes and Seats ', British Journal of Political Science36: 291—315.
35.
Rae, Douglas (1967) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
Reed, Steven (2001) `Duverger's Law is Working in Italy' , Comparative Political Studies34: 312—27.
37.
Sartori, Giovanni (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis , vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Sartori, Giovanni (1994) Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
39.
Siaroff, Alan (2003) `Two-and-a-Half-Party Systems and the Comparative Role of the “Half”' , Party Politics9: 267—90.
40.
Sturm, Roland (2001) `Divided Government in Germany: The Case of the Bundesrat', in Robert Elgie (ed.) Divided Government in Comparative Perspective, pp. 167—81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Taagepera, Rein (1999) `Supplementing the Effective Number of Parties' , Electoral Studies18: 497—504.
42.
Taagepera, Rein (2004) `Extension of the Nagayama Triangle for Visualization of Party Strengths' , Party Politics10: 301—6.
43.
Taagepera, Rein (2005) `Conservation of Balance in the Size of Parties' , Party Politics11: 283—98.
44.
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Soberg Shugart (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
Vowles, Jack (2004) `Electoral Systems and Proportional Tenure of Government: Renewing the Debate' , British Journal of Political Science34: 166—79.
46.
Webb, Paul (2000) The Modern British Party System. London: Sage.
47.
Woldendorp, Jaap , Hans Keman and Ian Budge (1993) `Political Data 1945—1990: Party Government in 20 Democracies' , European Journal of Political Research24: 1—119.
48.
Woldendorp, Jaap , Hans Keman and Ian Budge (1998) `Party Government in 20 Democracies: An Update (1990—1995)' , European Journal of Political Research33: 125—64.
