Under what conditions do Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) give attention to EU issues in European Parliament (EP) election campaigns? This study examines how party positioning on European integration and individual electoral incentives affected MEPs’ attention to EU issues in the 2019 EP election campaign. Based on data collected from Twitter, the findings show that pro-EU parties and individual vote-seeking incentives increased attention to EU issues. More specifically, they show that MEPs from pro-EU mainstream parties had incentives to debate about EU issues, especially when they competed for votes. The findings help to unfold the interplay between party-level and legislator-level factors and its effects on attention to EU issues and aim to contribute to research on EU issue salience and EP election campaigns.
Abou-ChadiTGreen-PedersenCMortensenP (2020) Parties’ policy adjustments in response to changes in issue saliency. West European Politics43(4): 749–771.
2.
AdamSMaierM (2011) National parties as politicizers of EU integration? Party campaign communication in the run-up to the 2009 European Parliament election. European Union Politics12(3): 431–453.
3.
AdamSMaierM (2016) Campaigning on or downplaying European Union integration? Explaining the salience parties attach to EU matters in European Parliamentary election campaigns. In: van der BrugWVreesede CH (eds) Un)intended Consequences of European Parliamentary Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 148–170.
4.
BakkerRHoogheLJollyS, et al. (2020) ‘2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey’. Version 2019.1. Available on Chesdata.eu. (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina).
5.
BalmasMRahatGSheaferT, et al. (2014) Two routes to personalized politics: centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics20(1): 37–51.
6.
BoydRLAshokkumarASerajS, et al. (2022) The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC-22. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app.
7.
BraunD (2021) The Europeanness of the 2019 EP elections and the mobilizing power of European issues. Politics41(4): 451–466.
8.
BraunDGrandeE (2021) Politicizing Europe in elections to the European parliament (1994–2019): the crucial role of mainstream parties. Journal of Common Market Studies59(5): 1124–1141.
9.
BraunDSchäferC (2022) Issues that mobilize Europe. The role of key policy issues for voter turnout in the 2019’, European Parliament election. European Union Politics3(1): 120–140.
10.
BraunDSchmittH (2020) Different emphases, same positions? The election manifestos of political parties in the EU multilevel electoral system compared. Party Politics26(5): 640–650.
11.
BraunDHutterSKerscherA (2016) What type of Europe? The salience of polity and policy issues in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics17(4): 570–592.
12.
CareyJM (2007) Competing principals, political institutions and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science51(1): 92–107.
13.
DäublerTHixS (2018) Ballot structure, list flexibility and policy representation. Journal of European Public Policy25(12): 1798–1816.
14.
DanielWObholzerLHurkaS (2019) Static and dynamic incentives for Twitter usage in the European Parliament. Party Politics25(6): 771–781.
15.
De VriesC (2017) Benchmarking Brexit: how the British decision to leave shapes EU public opinion. Journal of Common Market Studies55(S1): 38–53.
16.
De WildePLeupoldASchmidtkeH (2016) Introduction: the differentiated politicisation of European governance. West European Politics39(1): 3–22.
17.
DöringHManowP (2019) Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development version.
18.
DooleyN (2022) Frustrating Brexit? Ireland and the UK’s conflicting approaches to Brexit negotiations. Journal of European Public Policy, Online ahead of print DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2050780.
19.
EugsterBJalaliCMaierM, et al. (2021) When do European election campaigns become about Europe?’West European Politics44(7): 1425–1454.
20.
FarrellDMScullyR (2010) The European Parliament: one parliament, several modes of political representation on the ground?Journal of European Public Policy17(1): 36–54.
21.
FazekasZAdrian PopaSSchmittH, et al. (2021) Elite-public interaction on twitter: EU issue expansion in the campaign. European Journal of Political Research60(2): 376–396.
22.
GrandeEHutterS (2016) Introduction: European integration and the challenge of politicisation. In: HutterSGrandeEKriesiH (eds) Politicising Europe. Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–31.
23.
HermansenSSLPeganA (2023) Blurred lines between electoral and parliamentary representation: the use of constituency staff among members of the european parliament. European Union Politics. Online ahead of print DOI: 10.1177/146511652211499.
24.
HoboltSBde VriesC (2015) Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies48(9): 1159–1185.
25.
HoboltSBde VriesCE (2016) Turning against the Union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies44: 504–514.
26.
HoboltSBPopaSAVan der BrugW, et al. (2022) The Brexit deterrent? How member state exit shapes public support for the European Union. European Union Politics23(1): 100–119.
27.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A post-functionalist theory of European Integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
28.
HutterSKriesiH (2019) Politicizing Europe in times of crisis. Journal of European Public Policy26(7): 996–1017.
29.
HutterSBraunDKerscherA (2016) Constitutive issues as driving forces of politicisation? In: HutterSGrandeEKriesiH (eds) Politicising Europe. Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–155.
30.
KoedamJ (2021) Avoidance, ambiguity, alternation: position blurring strategies in multidimensional party competition. European Union Politics22(4): 655–675.
31.
KoopCRehCBressanelliE (2018) When politics prevails: parties, elections and loyalty in the European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research57: 563–586.
32.
KriesiH (2016) The politicization of European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies54: 32–47.
33.
LehmannF (2022) Talking about Europe? Explaining the salience of the european union in the plenaries of 17 national parliaments during 2006–2019. European Union Politics. Online ahead of print DOI: 10.1177/14651165221143962.
34.
MaierMBacherlePAdamS, et al. (2019) The interplay between parties and media in putting EU issues on the agenda: a temporal pattern analysis of the 2014 European Parliamentary election campaigns in Austria, Germany and the United Kingdom. Party Politics25(2): 167–178.
35.
MüllerWStrømK (1999) Policy, office or votes? In: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
NaiAMedeirosMMaierM, et al. (2022) Euroscepticism and the use of negative, uncivil and emotional campaigns in the 2019 European Parliament election: a winning combination. European Union Politics23(1): 21–42.
37.
NultyPYTheocharisSAPopaOP, et al. (2016) Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament. Electoral Studies44: 429–444.
38.
ObholzerLDanielWT (2016) An online electoral connection? How electoral systems condition representatives’ social media use. European Union Politics17(3): 387–407.
39.
PolkJRovnyJBakkerJR, et al. (2017), ‘Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data,’ Research & PoliticsOnline ahead of print (January-March): 1–9.
40.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections - a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
41.
SpoonJ-J (2012) ‘How salient is Europe? An analysis of European election manifestos, 1979–2004’, European Union Politics13(4): 558–579.
42.
StierSFroioCSchünemannWJ (2021) Going transnational? Candidates’ transnational linkages on Twitter during the 2019 European Parliament elections. West European Politics44(7): 1455–1481.
43.
Van MiddelaarL (2016) The return of politics – the European Union after the crises in the Eurozone and Ukraine. Journal of Common Market Studies54(3): 495–507.
44.
VasilopoulouSGattermannK (2021) Does politicization matter for EU representation? A comparison of four European parliament elections. Journal of Common Market Studies59(3): 661–678.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
