This article briefly reviews discussions about relations between unmediated decision-making procedures and political parties. Late-19th-century debates about institutional reform established the idea that direct democracy undermines parties' power. A century later, proponents of direct democracy and intra-party democracy still promote them in these terms. However, prior research indicates that neither direct democracy nor intra-party democracy automatically weaken the importance of parties, though both the availability and use of unmediated procedures often affect patterns of political competition.
von Arnim, Hans Herbert (1993) `Hat die Demokratie noch Zukunft?', Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 27 November.
2.
Beard, Charles (1910) American Government and Politics. New York: Macmillan.
3.
Bogdanor, Vernon (1981) The People and the Party System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Boyer, Patrick (1992a) Direct Democracy in Canada: The History and Future of Referendums. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
5.
Boyer, Patrick (1992b) The People's Mandate: Referendums and a More Democratic Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
6.
Brown, James Sayles (1897) Partisan Politics: The Evil and the Remedy. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
7.
Bryce, James (1891) The American Commonwealth. London: Macmillan.
8.
Butler, David and Austin Ranney (1994) `Conclusion', in David Butler and Austin Ranney (eds) Referendums Around the World, pp. 258-263. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
9.
Cree, Nathan (1892) Direct Legislation by the People. Chicago, IL: A. C. McClurg & Co.
10.
Croly, Herbert (1914) Progressive Democracy. New York: Macmillan.
11.
DePloige, Simon (1892) La Referendum en Suisse. Brussels: n.p.
12.
DePloige, Simon (1898) The Referendum in Switzerland. London: Longmans, Green and Co. (trans. C. P. Trevelyan).
13.
Dicey, Albert V. (1890) The Law of the Constitution. London: Macmillan.
14.
Dicey, Albert V. (1894) `The Referendum', The National Review (March): 65-72.
15.
The Economist (1996) `Full Democracy', The Economist (21 Dec.): 5-14.
16.
Gallagher, Michael (1996) `Conclusion', in Gallagher and Uleri (eds), pp. 226-52.
17.
Gallagher, Michael and Pier Vicenzo Uleri, eds (1996) The Referendum Experience in Europe. Busingstoke: Macmillan.
18.
Goodnow, Frank J. (1900) Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. London: Macmillan.
19.
Kautsky, Karl (1893) Der Parlamentarismus, die Volksgesetzgebung und die Sozialdemokratie. Stuttgart: Verlag J. H. W. Dietz Nachf.
20.
Laveleye, Emile de (1892) Le Gouvernement dans la démocratie. 2nd edn.Paris: Ancienne Librairie Germer Baillière.
21.
Laycock, David (1990) Populism and Democratic Thought in the Canadian Prairies, 1910 to 1945. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
22.
Lecky, William (1896) Democracy and Liberty. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.
23.
Luthardt, Wolfgang (1994) Direkte Demokratie: ein Vergleich in Westeuropa. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
24.
McCrackan, W. D. (1893) `The Swiss Referendum: The Ideal Republican Form', The Cosmopolitan15: 329-333.
25.
Oberholtzer, Ellis (1891) `Law-Making by Popular Vote; or, the American Referendum', Annals of the American Academy (Nov.): 36-56.
26.
Revue des deux Mondes (1892) `Une question de Droit Constitutionnel', Revue des deux Mondes111: 112-143.
27.
Selborne, Earl of (1911) `The Unionist Party and the Referendum', The Oxford and Cambridge Review (July): 3-32.
28.
Suksi, Markku (1993) Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
29.
Sullivan, J. W. (1892) Direct Legislation by the Citizenship through the Intiative and Referendum. New York: Twentieth Century Publishing Co.
30.
Weyl, Walter E. (1912) The New Democracy: An Essay on Certain Political and Economic Tendencies in the United States. New York: Macmillan.
31.
Wuarin, Louis (1895) `Recent Political Experiments in the Swiss Democracy', Annals of the American Academy (Nov.): 361-380.