AI fortune-telling intertwines generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) with traditional divinatory practices, emerging as a new form of digital spirituality. This study examines how young Chinese users engage with AI fortune-telling within a socio-cultural context shaped by enduring traditions of fate discourse and intensifying uncertainties of late modern life. Drawing on qualitative analysis of user practices on Chinese social media platforms, the findings move beyond a binary framework of belief and disbelief, revealing three interrelated modes of engagement: affective resonance, playful engagement, and digital hybridity. This study conceptualizes AI fortune-telling as a flexible cultural practice through which users negotiate fate through technological mediation. By foregrounding this tension, this study extends affective practice theory into the domain of human–AI interaction, demonstrating how algorithmic systems become entangled with culturally embedded ethics and everyday sensemaking. It offers new insights into how digital technologies reconfigure the affective and spiritual dimensions of subjectivity in algorithmic societies.
Ball-RokeachSJ (1985) The origins of individual media-system dependency: a sociological framework. Communication Research12(4): 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365085012004003
2.
BaumanZ (2010) 44 Letters from the Liquid Modern World. Polity.
BrandtzaegPBSkjuveMFølstadA (2022) My AI friend: how users of a social chatbot understand their Human–AI friendship. Human Communication Research48(3): 404–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac008
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2021) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.
6.
CampbellHATsuriaR (eds) (2021) Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media. 2nd edition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295683
7.
CavalloFSemeraroFFioriniL, et al. (2018) Emotion modelling for social robotics applications: a review. Journal of Bionic Engineering15(2): 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0015-y
8.
ChangKC (1976) Early Chinese civilization: anthropological perspectives. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, Vol. 23.
9.
ChangKC (1980) Shang Civilization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
CheongPHLiuL (2025) Faithful innovation: negotiating institutional logics for AI value alignment among Christian churches in America. Religions16(3): 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030302
CohenMKhavkinMMovsowitz DavidowD, et al. (2024) ChatGPT in the public eye: ethical principles and generative concerns in social media discussions. New Media & Society28: 14614448241279034. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241279034
14.
CrawfordK (2021) AffectThe Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press, pp. 151–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ghv45t.8
FuHLiYLeeFL (2023) Techno-cultural domestication of online tarot reading in contemporary China. Media, Culture & Society45(1): 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221104700
18.
GiddensA (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. California: Stanford University Press.
19.
GivenLMPolkinghorneSRidgwayA (2025) ‘I think I misspoke earlier. My bad!’: exploring how generative artificial intelligence tools exploit society’s Feeling Rules. New Media & Society27(10): 5525–5545. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251338276
20.
Grall-BronnecMBulteauSVictorri-VigneauC, et al. (2015) Fortune telling addiction: unfortunately a serious topic about a case report. Journal of Behavioral Addictions4(1): 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.4.2015.1.7
21.
GregoryK (2019) Pushed and pulled to the internet: self employment in the spiritual marketplace. American Behavioral Scientist63(2): 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218794768
22.
HanBC (2017) Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. New York: Verso Books.
23.
HoAHancockJMinerAS (2018) Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot. Journal of Communication68(4): 712–733. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy026
JaynesV (2020) The social life of screenshots: the power of visibility in teen friendship groups. New Media & Society22(8): 1378–1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819878806
26.
JiangZ (2025) “Becoming Free” through Fortune-telling: value-Seeking, spiritual cultivation and personhood among rural aunties in urban China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology12(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-025-00241-3
27.
JungJKimJ-N (2025) Rethinking media users in the age of AI and algorithmic mediation. Media and Communication13: 10915. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.10915
28.
KuoC (2009) A study of the consumption of Chinese online fortune telling services. Chinese Journal of Communication2(3): 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750903209010
29.
Leo-LiuJWu-OuyangB (2024) A “soul” emerges when AI, AR, and Anime converge: a case study on users of the new anime-stylized hologram social robot “Hupo.”. New Media & Society26(7): 3810–3832. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221106030
30.
LevinsonP (2005) The Soft Edge: A Natural History and Future of the Information Revolution. London and New York: Routledge.
31.
LiHZhangR (2024) Finding love in algorithms: deciphering the emotional contexts of close encounters with AI chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication29(5): zmae015. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae015
32.
LuciaBVetterMPatelV (2025) The dystopian imaginaries of ChatGPT: a designed cycle of fear. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies31(4): 1233–1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565251333212
33.
MillerM (2024) Reflecting the seen scene: theorizing screenshots as multistable metapictures. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies3: 13548565241308449. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241308449
34.
NataleSBallatoreA (2020) Imagining the thinking machine: technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies26(1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517715164
35.
NijdamE“B (2023) Sami-digital storytelling: survivance and revitalization in Indigenous digital games. New Media & Society25(11): 3093–3116. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038902
PanSFortunatiLEdwardsA (2025) Grooming an ideal chatbot by training the algorithm: exploring the exploitation of replika users’ immaterial labor. New Media & Society27(10): 5489–5507. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251338271
PerrottaCSelwynNEwinC (2024) Artificial intelligence and the affective labour of understanding: the intimate moderation of a language model. New Media & Society26(3): 1585–1609. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221075296
40.
PetersJD (2015) The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
41.
PostmanN (2011) Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. California: Vintage.
42.
RainsSAPavlichCATsetsiE, et al. (2020) Evaluating the scope and theoretical mechanisms of person-centered social support: the case of the comforting computer program. Communication Research47(4): 512–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219852554
43.
ShinD (2020) User perceptions of algorithmic decisions in the personalized AI system:perceptual evaluation of fairness, accountability, transparency, and explainability. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media64(4): 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357
44.
SmithRJ (1992) Fortune-Tellers and Philosophers: Divination in Traditional Chinese Society. 1st edition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429039799.
SundarSS (2020) Rise of machine agency: a framework for studying the psychology of Human–AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication25(1): 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026
47.
TandocECLouCMinVLH (2019) Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context: how and why users navigate multiple social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication24(1): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy022
WangX (2019) “Folk Belief,” cultural turn of secular governance and shifting religious landscape in contemporary China. In: DeanKVan Der VeerP (eds) The Secular in South, East, and Southeast Asia. Springer International Publishing, pp. 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89369-3_7
51.
WangFTaiH (2025) Acting upon the “stars”: the spiritual dilemmas and solutions of college students’ online astrology—A survey of 2,100 college students’ zodiac and tarot divination practices. Science and Atheism1: 59–73.
52.
WeberM (1958) Science as a vocation. In: GerthHHMillsCW (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–144.
WiesseB (2019) Affective practice. In: Affective Societies. New York: Routledge, pp. 131–139.
55.
YangMM (2020) Re-enchanting Modernity: Ritual Economy and Society in Wenzhou, China. Duke University press.
56.
ZhaiH (2025) Hashtags and Hope: Tracing Chinese Digital Spirituality Through #WishMeABabyBoy Trend on Xiaohongshu (Rednote). Social Media + Society11(3): 20563051251369816. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251369816
57.
ZhangXWangY (2025) Swiping through the stars: exploring identity and intimacy through astrology sensemaking on Douyin. New Media & Society5: 14614448251344588. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251344588
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
