Older adults are often perceived as vulnerable to digital exclusion, a notion exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic and the increased reliance on digital technology. This study investigates how older users perceive their own digital inclusion and explores whether they are influenced by stereotypes associated with older individuals and digital technology. Through an analysis of 37 semi-structured interviews with older users in Belgium, this research reveals that older individuals interpret their digital inclusion through a life course lens. Previous education and professional experiences contribute to their current level of digital inclusion. However, participants demonstrate awareness of ageist stereotypes and use them to differentiate themselves from older non-users. Interestingly, while they actively challenge and refute these stereotypes in their own digital engagement, they occasionally unintentionally employ the same stereotypes when describing individuals who do not use EICT.
AmaralIFloresAMM (2023) Challenging gendered and ageing normative stereotypes on Instagram. In: RosalesAFernández-ArdèvolMSvenssonJ (eds) Digital Ageism: How it Operates and Approaches to Tackling it. Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture. Routledge, pp. 152–171.
2.
ArigoDBercovitzILapitanE, et al. (2024) Social comparison and mental health. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry11: 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-024-00313-0
3.
AsmarAVan AudenhoveLMariënI (2020) Social support for digital inclusion: towards a typology of social support patterns. Social Inclusion8(2): 138–150. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2627
4.
AsmarAMariënIVan AudenhoveL (2022) No one-size fits all! Eight profiles of digital inequalities for customized inclusion strategies. New Media & Society24(2): 279–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063182
5.
AttewellP (2001) The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education74(3): 252–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673277
6.
BakardjievaM (2005) Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. Sage.
7.
Barbosa NevesBAmaroF (2012) Too old for technology? How the elderly of Lisbon use and perceive ICT. The Journal of Community Informátics8(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v8i1.3061
BarrieHRoseTLDetlorB, et al. (2021) “Because I’m old”: the role of ageism in older adults’ experiences of digital literacy training in public libraries. Journal of Technology in Human Services39(4): 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2021.1962477
10.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1991) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Repr. In Penguin Books). Penguin Books.
CabalquintoEAhlinT (2023) Researching (im)mobile lives during a lockdown: Reconceptualizing remote interviews as field events. International Journal of Cultural Studies26(6): 802–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779231157428
14.
CalasantiT (2005) Ageism, gravity, and gender: experiences of aging bodies. Generations29(3): 8–12.
15.
ChuCHNyrupRLeslieK, et al. (2022) Digital ageism: challenges and opportunities in artificial intelligence for older adults. The Gerontologist62(7): 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab167
16.
ComunelloFMulargiaSIeracitanoF (2023) “Forever young?”: digital technology, ageism and the (non-)ideal user. In: RosalesAFernández-ArdèvolMSvenssonJ (eds) Digital Ageism: How it Operates and Approaches to Tackling it. Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture. Routledge, pp. 18–35.
17.
CourtoisCVerdegemP (2016) With a little help from my friends: an analysis of the role of social support in digital inequalities. New Media & Society18(8): 1508–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562162
18.
CzajaSJCharnessNFiskAD, et al. (2006) Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging21: 333–352.
19.
DanneferDFeldmanK (2017) Age integration, age segregation and generation X: life-course perspectives. Journal of the American Society on Aging41(3): 20–26.
20.
De MarezLSevenhantRGeorgesA, et al. (2022) Imec.digimeter 2022 Digitale Trends in Vlaanderen. imec.
21.
De MarezLGeorgesASevenhantR (2025) Imec.digimeter.2024. In: Digitale Trends N Vlaanderen. Tabellenrapport. Imec.
22.
De São JoséJTimonenV (2025) Age is not just a number: developing an integrative conceptual framework on age. Journal of Aging Studies73: 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101331
23.
DiMaggioPHargittaiE (2001) From the ‘Digital Divide’ to ‘Digital Inequality’: Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.
24.
DolničarVGrošeljDFilipovič HrastM, et al. (2018) The role of social support networks in proxy Internet use from the intergenerational solidarity perspective. Telematics and Informatics35(2): 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.005
25.
DuqueMOtaeguiA (2023) Digital dependency as a burden: impact of active aging for tech adoption in Brazil and Chile. Anthropology & Aging44(2): 28–44. https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2023.422
GallistlVRohnerRSeifertA, et al. (2020) Configuring the older non-user: between research, policy and practice of digital exclusion. Social Inclusion8(2): 233–243. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2607
28.
GallistlVRohnerRHenglL, et al. (2021) Doing digital exclusion – technology practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies59: 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973
29.
GeertsNSchirmerWVercruyssenA, et al. (2023) Exploring older adults’ ICT support: a mismatch between needs and provision. New Media & Society26(12): 7314–7330. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231166356
30.
GonzalezCKatzVS (2016) Transnational family communication as a driver of technology adoption. Internationa Journal of Communication10: 2683–2703.
31.
Graham BeaumontJKenealyPM (2004) Quality of life perceptions and social comparisons in healthy old age. Ageing & Society24(5): 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x04002399
32.
GulletteMM (2004) Aged by Culture. University of Chicago Press.
33.
HänninenRTaipaleSLuostariR (2020) Exploring heterogeneous ICT use among older adults: the warm experts’ perspective. New Media & Society23(6): 1584–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820917353
34.
HargittaiE (2003) The digital divide and what to do about it. In: New Economy Handbook 2003. Academic Press, pp. 821–839.
35.
HarrisDK (2016) Age norms. In: ParmoreEBBranchLGHarrisDK (eds) Encyclopedia of Ageism. Routledge, pp. 14–15.
36.
HeiselbergLStępińskaA (2022) Transforming qualitative interviewing techniques for video conferencing platforms. Digital Journalism11: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2047083
HelsperEJ (2017) The social relativity of digital exclusion: applying relative deprivation theory to digital inequalities. Communication Theory27(3): 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12110
HunsakerANguyenMHFuchsJ, et al. (2019) ‘He explained it to me and I also did it myself’: how older adults get support with their technology uses. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World5: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119887866
41.
HunsakerANguyenMHFuchsJ, et al. (2020) Unsung helpers older adults as a source of digital media support for their peers. The Communication Review, Epub ahead of print 2020.
42.
IvanLCutlerSJ (2021) Ageism and technology: the role of internalized stereotypes. University of Toronto Quarterly90(2): 127–139. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.90.2.05
Kania-LundholmM (2023) Coping in the culture of connectivity How older adults make sense of living with digital ageism. In: RosalesAFernández-ArdèvolMSvenssonJ (eds) Digital Ageism: How it Operates and Approaches to Tackling it. Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture. Routledge, pp. 192–209.
45.
Kania-LundholmMTorresS (2015) The divide within: older active ICT users position themselves against different ‘others’. Journal of Aging Studies35: 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2015.07.008
KorpelaVPajulaLHänninenR (2024) Investigating the multifaceted role of warm experts in enhancing and hindering older adults’ digital skills in Finland. International Journal of Lifelong Education43(5): 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2353176
48.
KöttlHGallistlVRohnerR, et al. (2021) “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies59: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971
49.
KöttlHAllenLDMannheimI, et al. (2022) Associations between everyday ICT usage and (self-)ageism: a systematic literature review. Gerontologist62(3): 413–424.
50.
LoosEIvanLFernández-ArdèvolM, et al. (2017) Ageing well? A cross-country analysis of the way older people are visually represented at websites of organizations for older people. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology8(2): 1–19.
51.
LuijkxKPeekSWoutersE (2015) “Grandma, you should do it—its cool” older adults and the role of family members in their acceptance of technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health12(12): 15470–15485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121214999
MannheimIVarlamovaMVan ZaalenY, et al. (2023) The role of ageism in the acceptance and use of digital technology. Journal of Applied Gerontology42(6): 1283–1294. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648231163426
54.
ManorSHerscoviciA (2021) “For us, Alibaba was just a story”: despite the power of habit older people are gradually adopting the digital discourse. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life15(1): 103–126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3399
55.
MarianoJMarquesSRamosMR, et al. (2020) Too old for computers? The longitudinal relationship between stereotype threat and computer use by older adults. Frontiers in Psychology11: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568972
56.
MathieuERitchieHRodés-GuiraoL, et al. (2020) Belgium: coronavirus pandemic country profile. Our World in Data. Epub ahead of print 11 May 2020.
57.
McDonoughCC (2016) The effect of ageism on the digital divide among older adults. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine2(1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24966/ggm-8662/100008
58.
McDonoughCC (2020) Determinants of a digital divide among able-bodied older adults: does “Feeling too old” play a role?International Journal of Aging Research3(60): 60–60.
59.
MitznerTLBoronJBFaussetCB, et al. (2010) Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior26(6): 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020
60.
NimrodG (2020) Aging well in the digital age: technology in processes of selective optimization with compensation. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B75(9): 2008–2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz111
61.
NowellLNorrisJMWhiteDE, et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. The International Journal of Qualitative Methods16(1): 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
PirhonenJOjalaHLumme-SandtK, et al. (2016) ‘Old but not that old’: Finnish community-dwelling people aged 90+ negotiating their autonomy. Ageing and Society36(8): 1625–1644. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x15000525
65.
Quan-HaaseAWilliamsCKicevskiM, et al. (2018) Dividing the grey divide: deconstructing myths about older adults’ online activities, skills, and attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist62(9): 1207–1228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218777572
RasiP (2022) Behind the Digi-God’s back’: social representations of older people’s digital competences and internet use in regional Finnish newspapers. Ageing and Society42(4): 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x20001269
68.
RosalesAFernandez-ArdevolM (2020) Ageism in the era of digital platforms. Convergence – The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies26(5–6): 1074–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520930905
69.
SeifertACottenSRXieB (2021) A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B76(3): e99–e103. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa098
70.
SevenhantRStragierJDe MarezL, et al. (2022) Imec.digimeter 2021. Digitale trends in Vlaanderen. Imec.
71.
SilverMP (2014) Socio-economic status over the lifecourse and internet use in older adulthood. Ageing & Society34(6): 1019–1034. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x12001420
72.
StypińskaJ (2023) AI ageism: a critical roadmap for studying age discrimination and exclusion in digitalized societies. AI & Society38(2): 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01553-5
73.
SulsJMarcoCATobinS (1991) The role of temporal comparison, social comparison, and directappraisal in the elderly’s self-evaluations of health. Journal of Applied Social Psychology21: 1125–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00462.x
74.
SvenssonJ (2023) Technology culture as youth oriented. In: RosalesAFernández-ArdèvolMSvenssonJ (eds) Digital Ageism: How it Operates and Approaches to Tackling it. Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture. Routledge, pp. 71–87.
75.
Van DeursenAJAM (2020) Digital inequality during a pandemic: quantitative study of differences in COVID-19–related internet uses and outcomes among the general population. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(8): e20073. https://doi.org/10.2196/20073
76.
Van DeursenAJAMHelsperEJ (2015) A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication30(2): 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115578059
77.
Van DeursenAJAMHelsperEJ (2018) Collateral benefits of Internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomesof engaging with the internet. New Media & Society20(7): 2333–2351. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715282
Van DijkJAGM (2005) The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Sage publications.
80.
Van DijkJAGM (2020) Closing the digital divide the role of digital technologies on social development, well-being of all and the approach of the Covid-19 pandemic. In: Virtual Expert Group UN Meeting on “Socially just transition towards sustainable development: The role of digital technologies on social development and well-being of all”, 4-7 August 2020, New York.
81.
Van LeeuwenC (2025) More Than A Number: The Role of Age in the Digital Engagement of Older Adults in Belgium. In: GaoQinZhouJia (eds). Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Springer Cham, 15811, 269–284.
82.
Van LeeuwenCJacobsAMariënI (2023) Catching the Digital Train on Time: Older Adults, Continuity, and Digital Inclusion. Social Inclusion11(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i3.6723
83.
VincentJ (2023) Life stage or age? Reviewing perceptions of the oldest digital users. In: RosalesAFernández-ArdèvolMSvenssonJ (eds) Digital Ageism: How it Operates and Approaches to Tackling it. Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture. Routledge, pp. 36–52.
84.
VulpeSCrăciunA (2020) Silver surfers from a European perspective: technology communication usage among European seniors. European Journal of Ageing. Epub ahead of print 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-019-00520-2
85.
WeilJKamberTGlazebrookA, et al. (2021) Digital inclusion of older adults during COVID-19: lessons from a case study of older adults technology services (OATS). Journal of Gerontological Social Work64(6): 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2021.1919274
86.
WilkinsonJAFerraroK (2002) Thirty years of ageism research. In: NelsonTD (ed) Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons. MIT press, pp. 339–358.
87.
WoodJV (1996) What is social comparison and how should we study it?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin22(5): 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225009
88.
XiWZhangXAyalonL (2022) When less intergenerational closeness helps: the influence of intergenerational physical proximity and technology attributes on technophobia among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior131: 107234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107234
