Building upon the circumplex approach to (de)motivating styles defined by self-determination theory, this research aimed: (a) to analyse the extent to which physical education (PE) teachers’ (de)motivating teaching approaches differ across gender, school level, and years of teaching experience, and (b) to test paths from PE teachers’ need-based experiences to their (de)motivating teaching approaches, via motivation quality. A purposive and cross-sectional sample of 667 Spanish PE teachers (63.7% male; 54.7% primary; mean teaching experience = 10.77 years) participated. The overall results found that male, secondary school, and more experienced teachers scored lower on autonomy-supportive approaches, and higher on controlling and chaotic approaches. The findings also showed that, after controlling for gender, school level, and teaching experience, need satisfaction showed a direct significant effect on autonomous motivation and an indirect effect on participative, attuning, guiding, and clarifying approaches via autonomous motivation. Need frustration showed a direct significant effect on controlled motivation and amotivation and an indirect effect on demanding, domineering, abandoning, and awaiting approaches via controlled motivation and amotivation. Another noteworthy result is the positive relationship between need satisfaction and controlled motivation. Our results underscore the role that PE teachers’ personal traits play in the adaptive motivational mechanisms underlying their variety of (de)motivating approaches to PE teaching.
AbósÁHaerensLSevil-SerranoJ, et al. (2018) Teachers’ motivation in relation to their psychological functioning and interpersonal style: A variable- and person-centered approach. Teaching and Teacher Education74: 21–34.
2.
AbósÁHaerensLSevil-SerranoJ, et al. (2019) Does the level of motivation of physical education teachers matter in terms of job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion? A person-centered examination based on self-determination theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health16(16): 1–15.
3.
AeltermanNVansteenkisteMHaerensL, et al. (2019) Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology111(3): 497–521.
4.
BarkoukisVNtoumanisNThøgersen-NtoumaniC (2010) Developmental changes in achievement motivation and affect in physical education: Growth trajectories and demographic differences. Psychology of Sport and Exercise11(2): 83–90.
5.
BartholomewKJNtoumanisNCuevasR, et al. (2014) Job pressure and ill-health in physical education teachers: The mediating role of psychological need thwarting. Teaching and Teacher Education37: 101–107.
6.
BartholomewKJNtoumanisNThøgersen-NtoumaniC (2009) A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: Implications for sports coaches. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology2(2): 215–233.
7.
BurelNTessierDLangdonJ (2021) Are teachers’ subjective feelings linked with need-supportive and need-thwarting motivating styles? A cross-lagged pilot study in physical education. European Journal of Psychology of Education36(4): 1221–1241.
8.
BurgueñoRAbósÁSevil-SerranoJ, et al. (2024) A circumplex approach to (de)motivating styles in physical education: Situations-in-school–physical education questionnaire in Spanish students, pre-service, and in-service teachers. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science28(1): 86–108.
9.
ChenBVansteenkisteMBeyersW, et al. (2015) Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion39(2): 216–236.
10.
CheonSHReeveJVansteenkisteM (2020) When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teaching and Teacher Education90: 103004.
11.
CohenJ (2013) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CollieRJShapkaJDPerryNE, et al. (2016) Teachers’ psychological functioning in the workplace: Exploring the roles of contextual beliefs, need satisfaction, and personal characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology108(6): 788–799.
13.
DigelidisNPapaioannouA (1999) Age-group differences in intrinsic motivation, goal orientations and perceptions of athletic competence, physical appearance and motivational climate in Greek physical education. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports9(6): 375–380.
14.
Dominguez-LaraS (2017) Magnitud del efecto en análisis de regresión. Interacciones: Revista de Avances en Psicología3(1): 3–5.
15.
EcclesJSRoeserRW (2011) Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence21(1): 225–241.
16.
Escriva-BoulleyGGuillet-DescasEAeltermanN, et al. (2021) Adopting the situation in school questionnaire to examine physical education teachers’ motivating and demotivating styles using a circumplex approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(14): 7342.
17.
Escriva-BoulleyGTessierDNtoumanisN, et al. (2018) Need-supportive professional development in elementary school physical education: Effects of a cluster-randomized control trial on teachers’ motivating style and student physical activity. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology7(2): 218–234.
18.
GeorgeDMalleryP (2003) SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 21.
19.
Granero-GallegosALópez-GarcíaGDBurgueñoR (2023) Are educator-created (dis)empowering climates equally associated with motivational experiences in physical education pre-service teachers as in foreign language pre-service teachers?Porta Linguarum76(VII): 75–94.
20.
Gutiérrez-Díaz del CampoDGarcía-LópezLMPastor-VicedoJC, et al. (2016) Teacher’s perception of physical education contribution, difficulties and significance within the competence-based approach. Retos31: 34–39.
21.
HaerensLAeltermanNVansteenkisteM, et al. (2015) Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise16: 26–36.
22.
HallTJSmithMA (2006) Teacher planning, instruction and reflection: What we know about teacher cognitive processes. Quest58(4): 424–442.
23.
HayesAF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. London: Guilford.
24.
HellebautSHaerensLVanderlindeR, et al. (2023) Burnout, motivation, and (de-)motivating teaching style in different phases of a teaching career. Teaching and Teacher Education129: 104168.
25.
HernaezR (2015) Reliability and agreement studies: A guide for clinical investigators. Gut64(7): 1018–1027.
26.
JangHReeveJDeciEL (2010) Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology102(3): 588–600.
27.
KlineRB (2010) Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research. In: ThompsonBSubotnikRF (eds) Methodologies for Conducting Research on Giftedness. Washington: American Psychological Association, 147–169.
28.
KlineRB (2018) Response to Leslie Hayduk’s review of principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th edition. Canadian Studies in Population45(3–4): 188.
29.
MoèAKatzI (2020) Self-compassionate teachers are more autonomy supportive and structuring whereas self-derogating teachers are more controlling and chaotic: The mediating role of need satisfaction and burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education96: 103173.
NosekBASmythFLHansenJJ, et al. (2007) Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology18(1): 36–88.
32.
PelletierLGSéguin-LévesqueCLegaultL (2002) Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology94(1): 186–196.
33.
ReeveJCheonSH (2021) Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist56(1): 54–77.
34.
RyanRMDeciEL (2017) Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York, NY: Guilford.
35.
RyanRMDeciEL (2020) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology61(April): 101860.
36.
SkinnerEAZimmer-GembeckMJConnellJP, et al. (1998) Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development63(2-3): 1–224 (Serial no. 254). doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1166220.
37.
Van den BergheLVansteenkisteMCardonG, et al. (2014) Research on self-determination in physical education: Key findings and proposals for future research. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy19(1): 97–121.
38.
VansteenkisteMRyanRMSoenensB (2020) Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion44(1): 1–31.
39.
VasconcellosDParkerPDHillandT, et al. (2020) Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology112(7): 1444–1469.
40.
VermoteBAeltermanNBeyersW, et al. (2020) The role of teachers’ motivation and mindsets in predicting a (de)motivating teaching style in higher education: A circumplex approach. Motivation and Emotion44(2): 270–294.
41.
VermoteBVansteenkisteMAeltermanN, et al. (2023) Teachers’ psychological needs link social pressure with personal adjustment and motivating teaching style. Journal of Experimental Education91(4): 696–717.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
