This article discusses a comparative study of how local actors tackle health inequalities in England, Scotland and Wales. The main method used in this study was a thematic analysis of 200 interview transcripts. Its focus was on how health inequalities are framed for intervention by performance assessment systems and the challenge for these systems that their nature as a ‘wicked issue’ presents. The three different national contexts are described, including organizational structures and the use of targets, and the difficulty of making evaluative comparisons is considered. Reflecting on results from the study, it is concluded that both divergence and convergence in themes across the three countries reveal narrative patterns that draw on discourses rather than evidence. The nature of national performance audit regimes appears to play an important part in shaping these discourses, which are themselves evolving, partly in interaction with local feedback.
Barnes, M., E. Matka and H. Sullivan ( 2003) ‘Evidence, Understanding and Complexity: Evaluation in NonLinear Systems’, Evaluation9(3): 265-84.
2.
Benzeval, M. ( 2003) The Final Report of the Tackling Inequalities in Health Module: The National Evaluation of Health Action Zones. A Report to the Department of Health. London: Queen Mary, University of London.
3.
Blackman, T. ( 2007) ‘Statins, Saving Lives and Shibboleths’, British Medical Journal334: 902.
4.
Blackman, T. ( 2008) ‘Can Smoking Cessation Services be Better Targeted to Tackle Health Inequalities? Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study’ , Health Education Journal67: 91-101.
5.
Blackman, T., E. Elliott, A. Greene, B.E. Harrington, D.J. Hunter, L. Marks, L. McKee, K.E. Smith and G. Williams, G. ( 2009) ‘Tackling Health Inequalities in Post-Devolution Britain: Do Targets matter?’, Public Administration87: 762-778.
6.
Bundred, S. ( 2005) ‘Minimizing the Burden of Regulation’, Review: The Newsletter of the Public Management and Policy Association28: 14.
7.
Byrne, D. ( 1997) Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
8.
Chapman, J. ( 2004) System Failure, 2nd edn. London: Demos.
9.
Christie, B. ( 2003) ‘Scotland Opts for a More Integrated Approach to Health Care’, British Medical Journal326: 519.
10.
Clarke, J. ( 2006) ‘Scrutiny through Inspection and Audit: Policies, Structures and Processes’, in L. Budd, J. Charlesworth and R. Paton (eds) Making Policy Happen, pp. 207-15. London: Routledge.
11.
Department of Health (2004) Choosing Health, Cm 6374. London: HMSO.
12.
Exworthy, M., L. Berney and M. Powell ( 2002) ‘How Great Expectations in Westminster may be Dashed Locally: The Local Implementation of National Policy on Health Inequalities’ , Policy and Politics30(1): 79-96.
13.
Foucault, M. ( 1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London : Tavistock.
14.
Giddens, A. ( 2001) Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
Graham, H. ( 2000) Understanding Health Inequalities. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
16.
Greer, S. ( 2004) The Politics of Health Policy Divergence. London: Constitution Unit, University College London .
17.
Gwyn, B. and Hood, C. ( 2006) ‘What’s Measured is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System’, Public Administration, 84(3): 517-38.
18.
Healthcare Commission (2004) Concordat between Bodies Inspecting, Regulating and Auditing Healthcare. London: Healthcare Commission.
19.
Hudson, B. and M. Henwood ( 2002) ‘The NHS and Social Care: The Final Countdown?’ , Policy and Politics30(2): 153-66.
20.
Hunter, D.J. and A. Killoran, A. ( 2004) Tackling Health Inequalities: Turning Policy into Practice? . London: Health Development Agency .
21.
Hunter, D.J. and L. Marks, L. ( 2005) Managing for Health: What Incentives Exist for NHS Managers to Focus on Wider Health Issues?London: King’s Fund.
22.
Kavangh, D. and D. Richards ( 2001) ‘Departmentalism and Joined-Up Government: Back to the Future?’, Parliamentary Affairs54(1): 1-18.
23.
Kreuter, M.W., C. De Rosa, E.H. Howze and G.T. Baldwin ( 2004) ‘Understanding Wicked Problems: A Key to Advancing Environmental Health Promotion’, Health Education and Behavior31(4): 441-54.
24.
Newman, J. ( 2001) Modernising Governance. London: SAGE.
25.
Nutley, S.M., I. Walter and H.T.O. Davies ( 2007) Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services . Bristol: Policy Press.
26.
Plsek, P. ( 2001) ‘Redesigning Health Care with Insights from the Science of Complex Adaptive Systems’, in Committee on Quality Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine (ed.) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, pp. 309-22. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27.
Plsek, P. and T. Greenhalgh ( 2001) ‘The Challenge of Complexity in Health Care’ , British Medical Journal323: 625-8.
28.
Rittel, H., and Webber, M. ( 1973) ‘Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning’ , Policy Sciences4: 155-69.
29.
Smith, K.E., C. Bambra, K.E. Joyce, N. Perkins, D.J. Hunter and E. Blenkinsopp ( 2009a) ‘Partners in Health? A Systematic Review of the Impact of Organizational Partnerships on Public Health Outcomes in England between 1997 and 2008’, Journal of Public Health31: 210-21.
30.
Smith, K.E., D.J. Hunter, T. Blackman, G. Williams, L. McKee, B.E. Harrington, E. Elliott, L. Marks and A. Greene ( 2009) ‘Divergence or Convergence? The Post-Devolution Health Policies of England, Scotland and Wales’, Critical Social Policy29(2): 216-42.
31.
Stacey, R. ( 2006) ‘Ways of Thinking about Public Sector Governance’ , in R. Stacey and D. Griffin (eds) Complexity and the Experience of Managing in Public Sector Organizations., pp. 15-42. London: Routledge.
32.
Travers, M. ( 2007) The New Bureaucracy: Quality Assurance and its Critics . Bristol: Policy Press.
33.
University of Birmingham School of Public Policy ( 1999) Cross-Cutting Issues in Public Policy and Public Service . London: DETR.
34.
West, D. ( 2009) ‘New-Look Welsh NHS Leaders are Unveiled’ , Health Service Journal (30 April): 8.
35.
WHO Regional Office for Europe (2002) The European Health Report. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
36.
Wrede, S., C. Benoit, I.L. Bourgeault, E.R. van Teijlingen, J. Sandall and R.G. De Vries ( 2006) ‘Decentred Comparative Research: Context Sensitive Analysis of Maternal Health Care’, Social Science and Medicine63: 2986-97.
