Reflexive Dialogues

Abstract

This article outlines a reflexive, dialogical approach to evaluation in which lived experiences, meanings and underlying values become the subject of reflexive dialogues among as many interested people as possible in order to heighten their understanding. Dialogue is considered as an open, divergent conversation. In contrast to a persuasive dialogue, this type of dialogue builds on reflection, the willingness to pause in a conversation, to spend time and to explore more deeply what seems to be essential to the participants themselves. Narrative (versus argumentative) rationality informs this kind of dialogue. A case example illustrates the approach. It concerns a formative evaluation of an injury-prevention programme in two performing-arts schools. The case shows how art students in particular experience the pressures of performance. Getting students, teachers and (para) medical experts to engage in reading stories of each other's experience also raises issues pertinent not only to their personal and mutual understanding but also to the culture of the institution.

Keywords

difference marginalization narrative understanding performing arts story workshops

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abma, T. A. (1998) ‘Writing for Dialogue, Text in Evaluation Context’, Evaluation 4(4): 434–454.

Abma, T. A. (2000a) ‘Dynamic Inquiry Relationships. Ways of Creating, Sustaining and Improving the Inquiry Process through the Recognition and Management of Conflicts’, Qualitative Inquiry 6(1): 132–150.

Abma, T. A. (2000b) ‘Stakeholder Conflict’, Program Planning and Evaluation 23: 199–210.

Abma, T. A. , I. J. A. de Jong and N. van der Zouwe (1998) Tegen beter weten in. Dilemma's verkend, verbreed en verbeeld. Tweede rapportage. Responsief onderzoek naar attitude-vorming inzake gezondheid bij de muziek en dansopleidingen van de Amsterdamse Hogeschool voor de Kunsten. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.

Bakhtin, M. (1953/1980) The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Barone, T. (1999) ‘Novelistic Narrative: Life Stories in the Formative Evaluation of a School Arts Program’, in T. A. Abma (ed.) Telling Tales, on Narrative and Evaluation, Advances in Program Evaluation 6, pp. 215–234. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

Bruner, J. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Buber, M. (1932) ‘Dialogisch Leven (Zweisprache)’, in J. Binger (collector and translator) Martin Buber: Zijn leven en zijn werk [Martin Buber: His Life and Work]. 's Gravenland: De Driehoek.

Ellinor, L. and G. Gerard (1998) Dialogue: Rediscovering the Transformative Power of Conversation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

10.

Forester, J. (1993) ‘Learning from Practice Stories’, in F. Fisher and J. Forester (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: UCL Press.

11.

Gergen, K. (1994) ‘The Limits of Pure Critique’, in M. Billig and H. W. Simons (eds) After Postmodernism: Reconstructing Ideology Critique. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

12.

Greene, J. C. (1997) ‘Participatory Evolution’, in L. Mabry (ed.) Evaluation and the Post-Modern Dilemma, Advances in Program Evaluation, 3, pp. 171–190. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

13.

Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

14.

Hosking, D. and A. Bass (1999) ‘Let's Not Talk About It For A Change’, working paper, Aston Business School.

15.

House, E. R. and K. R. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Krasnow, D. A. , G. Kerr and L. Mainwaring (1994) ‘Psychology of Dealing with the Injured Dancer’, Medical Problems of Performing Artists 9(1): 7–9.

17.

Kushner, S. (2000) Personalising Evaluation. London: Sage.

18.

Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba (1986) ‘But is it Rigorous? Trustworthiness and Authenticity in Naturalistic Evaluation’, in D. D. Williams (ed.) Naturalistic Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation 30, pp. 73–84. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

19.

Preskill, H. and R. T. Torres (1999) ‘Building Capacity for Organizational Learning through Evaluative Inquiry’, Evaluation 5(1): 42–60.

20.

Schwandt, T. A. (2000) ‘Dialogue, “Local” Evaluation and Education’, Presentation at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Waikiki, Hawaii, November.

21.

Trice, H. M. and J. M. Beyer (1993) The Cultures of Work Organisations. New York: Prentice Hall.

22.

Widdershoven, G. A. M. and C. Sohl (1999) ‘Interpretation, Action and Communication: Four Stories about a Supported Employment Program’, in T. A. Abma (ed.) Telling Tales, on Narrative and Evaluation, Advances in Program Evaluation 6, pp. 109–130. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.