Dazed and confused? An exploratory study of the image of Brazil as a travel destination

Abstract

The tourism industry in Brazil has been growing sharply in the past few years. Among its visitors, US citizens are one of the most important and attractive markets for the Brazilian tourism industry. It is believed, however, that most Americans still know little about Brazil and what it has to offer. This study had three objectives: determine the images that American citizens interested in travel and tourism have of Brazil as a travel destination, determine if they differentiate Brazil from neighbouring Hispanic countries and group them according to similar images of Brazil. Online discussion groups on travel and tourism were used to obtain a sample of this population. The results indicated that ‘natural attractions/interest’ and ‘vacation atmosphere/exoticness’ were the two most important images of Brazil among the respondents. The results also indicated that respondents were unable to differentiate Brazil from Hispanic countries.

Keywords

destination image destination selection factor and cluster analysis Brazil

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Embratur (2001) ‘Estudo da Demanda Turistica Internacional 2000, Brasilia’.

Reilly, M. D. (1990) ‘Free elicitation of descriptive adjectives for tourism image assessment’ , Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 21-26 .

Reilly, ref. 2 above.

Baloglu, S. and Bringberg D. (1997) ‘Affective image of tourism destinations’ , Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 11-15 .

Ko and Park, ref. 3 above.

Crompton, ref. 3 above.

Dobni and Zinkhan, 1990, and Mazursky and Jacoby, 1986, both cited by Ko and Park, ref. 3 above.

Milman, A. and Pizam, A. (1995) ‘The role of awareness and familiarity with a destination: The central Florida case’ , Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 21-27 .

Gartner, W. C. (1993) ‘Image formation process’ , Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 2, Nos 2/3, pp. 191-215 .

10.

Schneider, I. and Sonmez, S. (1999), ‘Exploring the touristic image of Jordan’ , Tourism Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 539-542 .

11.

Bignon, V. N. , Hammitt, W. E. and Norman, W. C. (1998) ‘French perceptions and images of the United States as a destination country’ , Tourism Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 3/4, pp. 159-171 .

12.

Dimanche, F. , and Moody, M. (1998) ‘Perceptions of destination image: A study of Latin American intermediary travel buyers’ , Tourism Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 3/4, pp. 173-180 .

13.

Baloglu and Bringberg, ref. 4 above.

14.

Gartner, ref. 9 above.

15.

Baloglu and McCleary, ref. 3 above.

16.

Echtner, C. M. , and J. R. B. Ritchie (1993) ‘The measurement of destination image: An empirical assessment’ , Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 3-13 .

17.

Evidence for the assertion made in this sentence comes from Gartner, ref. 9 above, and Ko and Park, ref. 3 above.

18.

Gartner, ref. 9 above.

19.

Chaudhary, M. (2000), ‘India’s image as a tourist destination — A perspective of foreign tourists’ , Tourism Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 293-297 .

20.

Reilly, ref. 2 above.

21.

Echtner and Ritchie, ref. 16 above.

22.

Murphy, L. (1999) ‘Australia’s image as a holiday destination: Perceptions of backpacker visitors’ , Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 21-45 .

23.

Hair, J. F. , Anderson, R. and Tatham, R. (1987) ‘Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings’, Macmillan, New York , pp. 233-348.

24.

Echtner and Ritchie, ref 16 above.

25.

Ibid.

26.

Ibid.

27.

Ibid.

28.

Ibid.