The alienation of body parts and their transformation into commodities raises questions about ownership, property rights, and about possible violation of the moral order. This article focuses on the `social life' of objects, including body parts, and the multiple meanings attached to them that are made visible in systems of exchange. The transformation of DNA obtained in blood samples into immortalized cell lines for use in the Human Genome Diversity Project is introduced as an illustration of contested commodification. The meanings attached to the blood samples by those from whom they are procured and their worth to the scientists who create the cell lines are of an entirely different order. Disputes about the HGDP that have erupted since it was first planned are presented in detail, followed by a discussion of the ethics of gene prospecting and the associated politics of biocapitalism currently proliferating in the private sector.
Appadurai, Arjun
(1986) ‘Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value’, pp. 3–63 in Arjun Appadurai (ed.) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Austin, Christopher P.
and Jack L. Tribble (1997) ‘Gene Patents and Drug Development: The Perspective from Merck’, pp. 379–383 in Bartha Maria Knoppers, Claude M. Laberge and Marie Hirtle (eds) Human DNA: Law and Policy – International and Comparative Perspectives. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
3.
Baumann, Miges
, Janet Bell, Florianne Koechlin and Michael Pimbert (1996) The Life Industry: Biodiversity, People and Profits. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
4.
Bhat, Amar
(1996) ‘The National Institutes of Health and the Papua New Guinea Cell Line’, Cultural Survival Quarterly20(Summer): 29–31.
5.
Businesswire(1996) ‘USA: Cell Cultures are Increasingly Important to Manufacturing in the Biotechnology Industry’, 28 May.
6.
Bynum, Caroline Walker
(1991) Fragmentation and Redemption: Essays on Gender and the Human Body in Medieval Religion. New York: Zone Books.
7.
Cambrosio, Alberto
and Peter Keating (1995) Exquisite Specificity: The Monoclonal Antibody Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Christie, Jean
(1996) ‘Whose Property, Whose Rights?’, Cultural Survival Quarterly20: 34–36.
9.
Dukepoo, F.C.
(in press) ‘Native American Perspectives on Genetic Patenting’, Religion, Science and Industry in Dialogue. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
10.
Duster, Troy
(1990) Back Door to Eugenics. New York: Routledge.
11.
Eisenberg, R.
(1992) ‘Genes, Patents, and Product Development’, Science257: 903-903.
12.
Enright, Anne
(2000) ‘What’s Left of Henrietta Lacks?’, London Review of Books13 April: 8–10.
13.
Fowler, Edward
(2000) ‘The Buraku in Modern Japanese Literature: Texts and Contexts’, The Journal of Japanese Studies26(1): 1–39.
14.
Fox Keller, Evelyn
and Helen E. Longino (eds) (1996) Feminism and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Geertz, Clifford
(1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Globe and Mail(1998) ‘A World Gene Hunt Targets Canada’, 28 November.
17.
Greenblatt, Stephen
(1991) Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Grounds, Richard A.
(1996) ‘The Yuchi Community and the Human Genome Diversity Project’, Cultural Survival QuarterlySummer: 64–68.
19.
Guha, Sumit
(1998) ‘Lower Strata, Older Races and Aboriginal Peoples: Racial Anthropology and Mythical History Past and Present’, Journal of Asian Studies57(2): 423–441.
20.
Haraway, Donna
(1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium: FemaleMan_Meets_Oncomouse. New York: Routledge.
21.
Hatanaka, Toshiyuki (1999) ‘“Burakushi” no kansei: “buraku mondai wa rekishi ni kiin suru” no ka’, Gendai Shiso Ø 27: 52–62.
22.
Hobsbawm, Eric
(1992) ‘Ethnicity and Nationalism in Europe’, Anthropology Today8: 3–8.
23.
Hodgson, John
(1999) ‘CuraGen Lays Down Markers, 120,000 of Them’, Nature Biotechnology17: 951-951.
24.
HUGO (Human Genome Organization)
(1993) The Human Genome Diversity (HGD) Project: Summary Document. London: HUGO Europe.
25.
Ibeji, Yokatam
and Korowai Gane (1996) ‘The Hagahai Patent Controversy: In Their Own Words’, Cultural Survival QuarterlySummer: 33-33.
26.
Juengst, Eric T.
(1998) ‘Group Identity and Human Diversity: Keeping Biology Straight from Culture’, American Journal of Human Genetics63: 673–677.
27.
Knoppers, Bartha Maria
(ed.) (1998) Socio-Ethical Issues in Human Genetics. Cowansville, QC: Les Èditions Yvon Blais Inc.
28.
Knoppers, Bartha Maria
, Claude M. Laberge and Marie Hirtle (eds) (1997) Human DNA: Law and Policy – International and Comparative Perspectives. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
29.
Landecker, Hannah
(1999) ‘Between Beneficence and Chattel: The Human Biological in Law and Science’, Science in Context12(1): 203–225.
30.
Lewontin, Richard C.
(1992) ‘The Dream of the Human Genome’, The New York Review of Books28 May.
31.
Lewontin, Richard C.
, Steven Rose and Leon J. Kamin (eds) (1984) Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature. New York: Pantheon Books.
32.
Linebaugh, Peter
(1975) ‘The Tyburn Riot: Against the Surgeons’, in Douglas Hay, Peter Linebaugh, John Rule, E.P. Thompson and Cal Winslow (eds) AlbionÌs Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England. London: Allen Lane: 65–117.
33.
Lock, Margaret
(1993) ‘The Concept of Race: An Ideological Construct’, Transcultural Psychiatry Research Review30: 203–228.
34.
Lock, Margaret
(1998) ‘Situating Women in the Politics of Health’, pp. 48–63 in Susan Sherwin (ed.) The Politics of Women’s Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
35.
Lock, Margaret
(2002) Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Lock, Margaret
and Patricia Kaufert (1998) Pragmatic Women and Body Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MacIlwain, Colin
(1997) ‘Diversity Project “Does not Merit Federal Funding”’, Nature389: 774-774.
38.
Mantel, Hilary
(1998) The Giant O’Brien. Toronto: Doubleday Canada Ltd.
39.
Marks, Jonathan
(1998) Some Anthropological Issues Concerning the Human Genome Diversity Project.
40.
Marx, Karl
(1967) ‘“The Fetishism of Commodities”, Excerpts from Das Capital, Vol. I’, pp. 319–322 in Robert C. Tucker (ed.) The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edn.New York: W.W. Norton.
41.
Mauss, Marcel
(1967) The Gift, trans. Ian Cunnison. New York: Norton.
42.
Mead, Aroha Te Pareake
(1996) ‘Geneology, Sacredness, and the Commodities Market’, Cultural Survival QuarterlySummer: 46–51.
43.
National Research Council
(1997) Evaluating Human Genetic Diversity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44.
North American Committee of the Human Genome Diversity Project
(1997) ‘Proposed Model Ethical Protocol for Collecting DNA Samples’, Houston Law Review33: 1431–1473.
45.
P·lsson, GÌsli
and Paul Rabinow (1999) ‘Iceland: The Case of a National Human Genome Project’, Anthropology Today15(5): 14–18.
46.
Park, Katherine
(1995) ‘The Life of the Corpse: Division and Dissection in Late Medieval Europe’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences50: 114-114.
47.
Pennisi, Elizabeth
(1997) ‘NRC OKs Long-Delayed Survey of Human Genome Diversity’, Science278: 568-568.
48.
Potter, Paul
(1976) ‘Herophilus of Chalcedon: An Assessment of His Place in the History of Anatomy’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine50: 45–60.
49.
Preston, Douglas
(1997) ‘The Lost Man’, New Yorker16 June: 70–81.
50.
Rabinow, Paul
(1996) Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
RAFI (Rural Advancement Foundation International)
(1993) Patents, Indigenous Peoples, and Human Genetic Diversity(Communique, May). Ottawa: RAFI.
52.
RAFI (Rural Advancement Foundation International)
(1997) The Human Tissue Trade(Communique, January/February). Ottawa: RAFI.
53.
Richardson, Ruth
(1987) Death, Dissection and the Destitute. London: Routledge.
54.
Richardson, Ruth
(1996) ‘Fearful Symmetry: Corpses for Anatomy, Organs for Transplantation’, pp. 66–100 in Stuart J. Youngner, Rene C. Fox and Laurence J. O’Connell (eds) Organ Transplantation: Meaning and Realities. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
55.
Richardson, Ruth
and Brian Hurwitz (1995) ‘Donors’ Attitudes Towards Body Donation for Dissection’, Lancet346: 277–279.
56.
Roberts, Leslie
(1991) ‘Fight Erupts Over DNA Fingerprinting’, Science254: 1721–1750.
57.
Sahlins, Marshall
(1972) Stone Age Economics. Chicago and New York: Aldine, Atherton.
58.
Sharp, Leslie
(1995) ‘Organ Transplantation as a Transformative Experience: Anthropological Insights into the Restructuring of the Self’, Medical Anthropological Quarterly9: 357–389.
59.
Shelton, Brett Lee (1998) ‘Genetic Research and Native Peoples’, unpublished manuscript.
60.
Specter, Michael
(1999) ‘Decoding Iceland’, New Yorker18 January: 40–51.
61.
Starr, Douglas
(1998) Blood: An Epic History of Medicine and Commerce. New York: Alfred A. Knopp.
62.
Strathern, Marilyn
(1988) The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
Taussig, Michael T.
(1980) The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
64.
Taussig, Michael T.
(1987) Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
Taylor, Charles
(1992) Multiculturalism and ‘The Politics’ of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
Thomas, Nicholas
(1991) Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture and Colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
Thompson, Richard H.
(1989) Theories of Ethnicity: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Greenwood Press.
68.
Weiner, Annette B.
(1985) ‘Inalienable Wealth’, American Ethnologist12: 52–65.
69.
Weiner, Annette B.
(1992) Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.
70.
Wilmsen, Edwin
(1989) Land Filled with Flies: A Political Economy of the Kalahari. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
Wolf, Eric
(1982) Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
