National Vocations Qualifications (NVQs) in Prisons: A Reflection of Effort and Achievement or the Perpetuation of Existing Patterns of Discrimination?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 1996
National Vocations Qualifications (NVQs) in Prisons: A Reflection of Effort and Achievement or the Perpetuation of Existing Patterns of Discrimination?
The purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which gender or racial stereotypes are used to categorise or stigmatise inmates in the allocation of work, training and education in prisons. In setting out the impact of recent legislative reforms, the article begins by outlining the effects of the Further and Higher Education Act 1992 and the changes resulting from the introduction of National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs) to the prison regime. The requirement, for the purposes of Sentence Planning, of documentary evidence of an inmate's education and training profile will be seen to have far reaching effects at all stages through a prisoner's sentence; and beyond, for the many prisoners who will be subject to a period of compulsory supervision after release. Yet, it will also be shown that the system operates to allow highly discriminatory decisions to be taken without proper accountability. The effectiveness and implementation of the Prison Department's equal opportunities policy will be considered. The article will conclude by recommending further research that specifically focuses on the allocation of opportunities for education and training for prisoners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Prison Disturbances April 1990, Report of an Inquiry by the Rt. Hon Lord Justice Woolf and His Honour Judge Stephen Tumim CM.1456 HMSO.
2.
The Prison Service has stated (Briefing no. 39 16 Sept 1991) that the programme of change outlined in the Government White Paper, Custody, Care and Justice: the Way Ahead for the Prison Service in England and Wales, steers the Service towards the 12 major recommendations in the Woolf Report. In its Corporate Plan for 1994–97, the Prison Service, by placing emphasis on implementation—improving the quantity, quality, relevance and delivery of regime activities centred on work, training and education (para 7.4) is stated to be following the strategic framework for regime development which is set out in Custody, Care and Justice.
3.
Report on the Work of the Prison Service, April 1990—March 1991 CM.1724 HMSO.
4.
FitzgeraldM.SimJ. (1983) British PrisonsOxford, Basil Blackwell.
5.
The Future Direction of Education Provision in HM Prisons, Young Offender Institutions and Remand Centres: A summary of the findings and recommendations of the Prison Education Consultancy May and July 1994. This report summarises the findings of an investigation, commissioned by the Home Office in April 1994, following the contracting out of educational services. The project, which focused on current practices within education departments in prisons was undertaken by the Prison Research and Education Unit: University of Bristol, Amersham and Wycombe College and City College Manchester.
6.
Her Majesty’s Prison Service Corporate Plan 1994–97, Paragraph 7
7.
Custody, Care and Justice, Paragraph 7.25.
8.
The Prison Population in 1994, Home Office Statistical Bulletin, shows the prison population by ethnic origin as follows: White 83%; Black 12%; South Asian 3% Chinese/other Asian 1%; others not recorded 1%.
9.
Report of a Review by Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector for England and Wales of Suicide and Self-Harm in Prison Service Establishments in England and Wales, December 1990 HMSO.
10.
House of Commons Education, Science and Arts Select Committee, 2nd Report 1990–91, Prison Education.
11.
PillingJ. (1992) The Balance of Regime Activities, Headquarters H.M. Prison Service, letter from the Director General to Governors 17/6/1992.
12.
Regimes: National Vocational Qualifications for Prisoners, Home Office 1992.
13.
The Prison Service has accepted the Consultancy recommendation (footnote 5) that a Common National Framework for the ordering, delivery, development and monitoring of Education in HM Prisons, Remand Centres and Young Offender Institutions be adopted and implemented.
14.
GendersE.PlayerE. (1989) Race Relations in Prisons, Oxford, Open University Press.
15.
Home Office Statistical Bulletin 30 March 1993.
16.
WindleshamLord (1987) ‘Punishment and Prevention: The Inappropriate Prisoners’ Lecture given at Earlham Hall, University of East Anglia, 3 December.
17.
National framework for the Throughcare of offenders in Custody to the Completion of Supervision in the Community, (para. 8.7)
18.
Prison service Race Relations Manual 1991, (para 6.4)
19.
Genders and Player, ibid p. 129.
20.
Genders and Player, ibid.
21.
Black People in Prison: The Role of the Education Service. Report of a NACRO Seminar held on 2nd November 1987.
22.
DobashR. (1986) The Imprisonment of Women, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, p. 51.
23.
ibid.
24.
BrownR. (1981) ‘The Education of Women in Prison’ in FosterW. (ed.) Prison Education in England and Wales, Leicester, National Institute of Adult Education, Bristol.
25.
CarlenP. (1990) Alternatives to Women’s Imprisonment, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, p. 110 (quoting from the Governor’s Annual Report for 1987–88)
26.
WillfordM.(ed.) Higher Education in Prison: A Contradiction in Terms? Phoenix: Oryx Press (p. 139).
27.
CampJ. (1974) Holloway Prison: The Place and the People, p. 149.
28.
CarlenP. (1990) Alternatives to Women’s Imprisonment, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, p. 108.
29.
Of a total prison population of 48,778 in 1994, the number taking Open University degrees was 375, a gender breakdown of this figure was not available. Prison Annual Reports and Accounts 1993–94.
30.
Ennulat WilsonC. (1994) Women Offenders: A Population Overlooked, inWillfordM.(ed.), Higher Education in Prison: A Contradiction in Terms?Phoenix: Oryx Press.
31.
In 1993, a foreign prisoners’ resource pack was published. This was produced in collaboration with the Prison Reform Trust and provides essential information for both prisoners and staff.
32.
CarlenP. (1985) Criminal Women, Cambridge, Polity Press, p. 187.
33.
National Framework for the Throughcare of Offenders in Custody to the Completion of Supervision in the Community, The Prison and Probation Services, Home Office 1994.
34.
Sentence Planning Manual, Prison Service 1992.
35.
National Framework for the Throughcare of Offenders in Custody to the Completion of Supervision in the Community, The Prison and Probation Services, Home Office 1994.
36.
Prison Service Race Relations Manual 1991, 6.10.
37.
Genders and Player, ibid p. 14.
38.
ibid., p. 115.
39.
KarnV. (1983) ‘Race and Housing in Britain: The Role of the Major Institutions’ inGlazerNYoungK(eds.) Ethnic Pluralism and Public Policy (London: Heinmann), 162–83.
40.
See footnote 5.
41.
Black People in Prison: The Role of the Education Service. Report of a NACRO Seminar held on 2nd November 1987.
42.
Tchaikovsky Chris, founder of the campaigning group Women in Prison.
43.
Ennulat WilsonC. (1994) Women Offenders: A Population Overlooked, in WillfordM. (ed.), Higher Education in Prison: A Contradiction in Terms?Phoenix: Oryx Press. Wilson points out (p. 140) that most of the material on higher education programs has been drawn on experience and research in men’s prisons. She notes that comparatively little has been written about women prisoners and post-secondary education and states ‘What exists is mostly anecdotal material about the experience of teaching in a women’s prison, and about instructors having been pleasantly surprised at how literate the women are …’.
