An unequal social distribution of peripheral arterial disease and the possible explanations: results from a population-based study

Abstract

A low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with higher cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. It has remained unclear whether such a social gradient is evident in peripheral artery disease (PAD) because both diseases show different clinical courses. We looked at the association between education and income with PAD within the population of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (HNRS) including 4738 individuals. In both men and women, the ankle–brachial index (ABI) decreased and the prevalence of PAD (ABI < 0.9) increased with decreasing education and income. Looking only at participants without cardiovascular disease, doctor-diagnosed PAD and media calcinosis participants with low (odds ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.53–4.34) and median education (1.90, 1.27–2.85) had higher odds for suffering from PAD compared to participants with high education. Additional adjustment for classical arteriosclerosis risk factors reduced the strength of the association while the odds ratios remained elevated. Current smoking, diabetes and BMI seem to be the most relevant mediators. Income does not significantly correlate with events when adjustments for all other risk factors are made. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that PAD is more pronounced in men and women with lower socioeconomic status. Diabetes prevention and smoking prevention and cessation programs need to specifically target individuals of lower income and education. According to our findings, prevention of PAD would benefit extraordinarily.

Keywords

coronary artery disease education peripheral arterial disease socioeconomic status

References

1 Bhatt DL Steg PG Ohman EM . ; REACH Registry Investigators. International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA 2006; 295: 180–189.

2 CAPRIE Steering Committee . A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996; 348: 1329–1339.

3 Norgren L Hiatt WR Dormandy JA . Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33(suppl 1): S1–S75.

4 Dragano N Verde PE Moebus S . for the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis is more pronounced in men and women with lower socioeconomic status. Associations in a population based study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007; 14: 568–574.

5 Kaplan GA Keil JE . Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation 1993; 88: 1973–1998.

6 Mackenbach JP Bos V Anderson O . Widening socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in six Western European countries. Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32: 830–837.

7 Marmot M Bartley M . Social class and coronary heart disease. In: S Stansfeld M Marmot (ed). Stress and the heart. London: BMJ Books, 2002, p. 5–19.

9 Carson AP Rose KM Catellier DJ . Cumulative socioeconomic status across the life course and subclinical atherosclerosis. Ann Epidemiol 2007; 17: 296–303.

10.

10 Stang A Moebus S Dragano N . Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response. Eur J Epidemiol 2005; 20: 489–496.

11.

11 UNESCO . International Standard Classification of Education. ISCED 1997. Paris: UNESCO, 1997.

12.

12 Kröger K Stang A Kondratieva J . ; Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study Group. Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease – results of the Heinz Nixdorf recall study. Eur J Epidemiol 2006; 21: 279–285.

13.

13 Bild DE Folsom AR Lowe LP . Prevalence and correlates of coronary calcification in black and white young adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001; 21: 852–857.

14.

14 Colhoun HM Rubens MB Underwood SR Fuller JH . Cross sectional study of differences in coronary artery calcification by socioeconomic status. BMJ 2000; 321: 1262–1263.

15.

15 Gallo LC Matthews KA Kuller LH Sutton-Tyrrell K Edmundowicz D . Educational attainment and coronary and aortic calcification in postmenopausal women. Psychosom Med 2001; 63: 925–935.

16.

16 Diez Roux AV Detrano R Jackson S . Acculturation and socioeconomic position as predictors of coronary calcification in a multiethnic sample. Circulation 2005; 112: 1557–1565.

17.

17 Van Rossum CT van de Mheen H Witteman JC Mackenbach JP Grobbee DE . Socioeconomic status and aortic atherosclerosis in Dutch elderly people: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 142–148.

18.

18 Manhem K Dotevall A Wilhelmsen L Rosengren A . Social gradients in cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms of Swedish men and women: the Göteborg MONICA Study 1995. J Cardiovasc Risk 2000; 7: 359–368.

19.

20.

20 Rabi DM Edwards AL Southern DA . Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 124–131.

21.

21 Kuller LH Kinzel LS Pettee KK . Lifestyle intervention and coronary heart disease risk factor changes over 18 months in postmenopausal women: the Women On the Move through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN study) clinical trial. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006; 15: 962–974.

22.

22 Gulliford MC Mahabir D Rocke B . Diabetes-related inequalities in health status and financial barriers to health care access in a population-based study. Diabet Med 2004; 21: 45–51.

23.

23 Gulliford MC Sedgwick JE Pearce AJ . Cigarette smoking, health status, socio-economic status and access to health care in diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2003; 3: 4.

24.

24 Roskam AJ Kunst AE . The predictive value of different socio-economic indicators for overweight in nine European countries. Public Health Nutr 2008; 11: 1256–1266.

25.

25 Jotkowitz AB Rabinowitz G Raskin Segal A Weitzman R Epstein L Porath A . Do patients with diabetes and low socioeconomic status receive less care and have worse outcomes? A national study. Am J Med 2006; 119: 665–669.

26.

26 Smith GD Hart C Watt G Hole D Hawthorne V . Individual social class, area-based deprivation, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and mortality: the Renfrew and Paisley Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 399–405.

27.

27 Ainsworth BE Hakell WL Leon AS . Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 71–80.

28.

28 Ainsworth BE Leon AS Richardson MT Jacobs DR Paffenbarger RS . Accurcy of the college alumnus physical activity questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1403–1411.

29.

29 McDermott MM Greenland P Ferrucci L . Lower extremity performance is associated with daily life physical activity in individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 247–255.

30.

30 McDermott MM Greenland P Liu K . The ankle brachial index is associated with leg function and physical activity: the Walking and Leg Circulation Study. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 873–883.

31.

31 Garg PK Tian L Criqui MH . Physical activity during daily life and mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Circulation 2006; 114: 242–248.

32.

32 Kaufman JS Maclehose RF Kaufman S . A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2004; 1: 4.

33.

33 Kanjilal S Gregg EW Cheng YJ . Socioeconomic status and trends in disparities in 4 major risk factors for cardiovascular disease among US adults, 1971–2002. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 2348–2355.