Abstract
The importance of management strategies for subclavian artery aneurysms (SAAs) is underscored by the risks of aneurysm rupture and distal ischemia. However, there is no consensus on the optimal timing or strategies for treatment due to their low incidence. The existing literature primarily comprises case reports and small retrospective studies, providing limited high-quality evidence. The preservation of the vertebral artery (VA) is critical to the prognosis of SAA repair, particularly when a dominant ipsilateral VA exists and the circle of Willis is incomplete. In this review, we integrate published literature together with our center’s experience to classify SAAs into four types based on the anatomical relationship between the VA and the aneurysm, and we outline the treatment strategies for each type. Furthermore, given the substantial influence of diverse etiologies on disease progression, we address the clinical features and management approaches for SAAs based on distinct etiologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
