Abstract
Objective
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is frequently linked to dysfunctional family dynamics. While certain parental characteristics have been identified as risk factors, specific maternal social-cognitive traits remain underinvestigated. This study aimed to examine autistic traits and mentalization skills in biological mothers of adolescents engaging in NSSI.
Methods
The sample consisted of 100 female adolescents divided into three groups: Suicide Attempt and NSSI (n = 34), NSSI-only (n = 41), and healthy controls (n = 25). Biological mothers completed the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ), The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). Adolescents completed a semi-structured psychiatric interview, the Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. ANCOVA controlled for socioeconomic confounders.
Results
Mothers of adolescents in both clinical groups exhibited significantly lower RMET scores compared to the control group. This deficit remained significant even after controlling for potential confounders such as household income and maternal smoking. While Total AQ scores did not differ between groups, mothers in the clinical groups showed specific deficits in the social skills subscale. Importantly, adolescents who attempted suicide reported significantly higher “interpersonal influence” scores regarding the function of self-harm compared to the NSSI-only group.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that specific maternal deficits in mentalization and social skills may contribute to an invalidating family environment, thereby increasing adolescent vulnerability to self-harm behavior. Furthermore, the results highlight the importance of addressing maternal cognitive-emotional factors in assessment and intervention strategies.
Plain Language Summary
Why is this study important? Self-harm among teenage girls is rising and becoming a serious public health issue. While we know family relationships play a role, specific maternal characteristics have not been studied enough. This study looked at “mentalization” skills in mothers of teens who self-harm, their capacity to understand and respond to their child's mental state. What did we do? We compared three groups of teenage girls: (1) those who engaged in self-harm without ever attempting suicide, (2) those who had attempted suicide in addition to self-harming, and (3) healthy teens with no history of self-harm. We asked their biological mothers to complete a questionnaire about their social skills and autistic traits, and to take a test where they had to guess emotions just by looking at photos of people's eyes. We also interviewed the teens to understand the reasons behind their self-harm behaviors. What did we find? We found that mothers of teens who self-harm (in both clinical groups) had significantly more difficulty reading emotions from the eyes compared to mothers of healthy teens. Interestingly, these mothers did not report high levels of general autistic traits in the questionnaires; they specifically struggled with the skill of tuning into emotions in the eye test. Additionally, we found a key difference among the teens: those who had attempted suicide reported that they did so to get a reaction from others much more frequently than those who only engaged in self-harm. What does this mean? Our study suggests a link between a mother's difficulty in reading emotions and her child's self-harm behavior. Although we do not yet know the exact reasons underlying this relationship, it raises the possibility that missed emotional cues between mother and child may contribute to the issue. Therefore, helping mothers improve their skills in understanding emotions could be a valuable addition to the treatment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
