Abstract
Background
Current theoretical models emphasize sadness as a functional and multifaceted emotion, yet research often neglects the heterogeneity of children’s co-occurring emotional responses to sad events.
Aim
This study investigated the heterogeneity in children’s emotional responses to sad events, moving beyond variable-centered approaches that assume uniform emotionality.
Method
Using a person-centered approach grounded in the core affect framework, the primary aim was to identify distinct configurations of sadness, anger, fear, and confusion in middle childhood. A secondary aim explored whether mother’s and father’s attachment security and loneliness predicted membership in emotional profiles. A total of 174 children (age range: 7–11 years-old; M = 8.79, SD = 1.03; 55.9% female) participated.
Results
Latent Profile Analysis identified four distinct profiles: Sadness-Focused Response, Anxious Sadness, Emotional Overwhelming, and Externalized Sadness. ANOVAs revealed that sadness-focused profile showed higher loneliness than Emotional Overwhelming. Furthermore, Externalized Sadness showed lower attachment security for both mother and father than Sadness-Focused Response and Anxious Sadness.
Conclusion
These findings underscore that sad events elicit qualitatively different emotional configurations, highlighting the need for tailored assessment and intervention strategies based on distinct emotional response patterns.
Plain Language Summary
Sadness is a normal part of growing up, but not every child experiences it the same way. While many think of sadness as a single feeling, it often mixes with other emotions like anger or fear. Researchers wanted to understand these different emotional “mixtures” in children because traditional studies often assume everyone reacts similarly. The research involved 174 children between the ages of 7 and 11 from schools in Italy. Each child was asked to describe a recent event that made them feel very sad. They then rated how much sadness, anger, fear, and confusion they felt during that event. The children also completed surveys about their relationships with their parents and how often they felt lonely. The study discovered four distinct ways children react to sad events: sadness-focused, the most common and “balanced” response, where children felt mostly sad but did not feel much anger, fear, or confusion; anxious sadness, in which children felt both sad and very fearful, seeing the event as threatening; emotional overwhelming, in which children felt high levels of anger, fear, and confusion all at once, making it hard for them to even identify their sadness; externalized sadness, in which instead of feeling sad, children reacted primarily with anger. The study also found that the type of sad event (like an injury or a fight with a friend) didn’t determine which group a child fell into. Instead, their personal relationships mattered more. For example, children who felt lonelier were more likely to feel “overwhelmed” rather than just “sad.” Children who felt very secure with their parents were much less likely to react with anger. These results show that sadness is not the same for everyone. A child’s emotional reaction depends heavily on their personal sense of security and social connection rather than just the event itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
