This study investigated the influence of individual differences in people’s dispositional avoidance orientation on the persuasive effects of low- and high-threat messages promoting moderate drinking. First, participents (N = 99) individual differences in avoidance orientation were assessed, after which they were provided with either high- or low-threat messages about the consequences of drinking too much alcohol. The primary outcome measures were information acceptance, attitude and intention. Results showed that participants low in avoidance orientation were more likely to be persuaded by the low-threat message, whereas participants high in avoidance orientation were more likely to be persuaded by the high-threat message.
AikenLSWestSG (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Los Angeles: Sage.
2.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50: 179–211.
3.
AjzenI (2002) Attitudes. In: Fernandez BallesterosR (ed.) Encyclopedia of Psychological Assessment. London: Sage, pp. 110–115.
4.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 1173–1182.
5.
BennettPNormanPMooreLMurphySTudor SmithC (1997) Health locus of control and value for health in smokers and nonsmokers. Health Psychology16: 179–182.
6.
BrouwersMCSorrentinoRM (1993) Uncertainty orientation and protection motivation theory: the role of individual differences in health compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65: 102–112.
7.
BrownSLLockerE (2009) Defensive responses to an emotive anti-alcohol message. Psychology and Health24: 517–528.
8.
BrownSLSmithEZ (2007) The inhibitory effects of a distressing anti-smoking message on risk perceptions in smokers. Psychology and Health22: 255–268.
9.
CarverCSWhiteTL (1994) Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67: 319–333.
10.
CohenJ (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin112: 155–159.
11.
CoxDCoxAD (2001) Communicating the consequences of early detection: the role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing65: 91–103.
12.
CroyleRTHuntJR (1991) Coping with health threat: social influence processes in reactions to medical test results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology60: 382–389.
13.
De HoogNStroebeWDe WitJB (2005) The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31: 24–33.
14.
De BruijnGJKremersSPDe VetEDe NooijerJVan MechelenWBrugJ (2007) Does habit strength moderate the intention-behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? The case of fruit consumption. Psychology and Health22: 899–916.
15.
DijkstraADe VriesH (1999) The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Education and Counseling36: 193–203.
16.
DillardJPWeberKMVailRG (2007) The relationship between the perceived and the actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: a meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. Journal of Communication57: 613–631.
17.
DonaldsonL (2001) The Annual Report of the Chief Medical Office. London: Department of Health.
18.
EarlAAlbarracínD (2007) Nature, decay, and spiraling of the effects of fear-inducing arguments and HIV counseling and testing: a meta-analysis of the short- and long-term outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. Health Psychology26: 496–506.
19.
FloydDLPrentice DunnSRogersRW (2000) A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology30: 407–429.
20.
FrankenIHMurisPRassinE (2005) Psychometric properties of the Dutch BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment27: 25–30.
21.
GerendMAShepherdJE (2007) Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology26: 745–752.
22.
GoldmanMSBoydGMFadenV (2002) College drinking, what it is, and what to do about it: A review of the state of the science. Journal of Studies on Alcohol14: S1–S50.
23.
GoodAAbrahamC (2007) Measuring defensive responses to threatening messages: a meta-analysis of measures. Health Psychology Review1: 208–229.
24.
GrayJA (1990) Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion4: 269–288.
25.
HastingsGSteadMWebbJ (2004) Fear appeals in social marketing: strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology and Marketing21: 961–986.
26.
HillDChapmanSDonovanR (1998) The return of scare tactics. Tobacco Control7: 5–8.
27.
JemmottJBDittoPHCroyleRT (1986) Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50: 899–905.
28.
KellerPABlockLG (1999) The effect of affect-based dissonance versus cognition-based dissonance on motivated reasoning and health-related persuasion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied5: 302–313.
29.
KruglanskiAWWebsterDM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: ‘seizing’ and ‘freezing’. Psychological Review103: 263–283.
30.
KundaZ (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin108: 480–498.
31.
LatimerAEKatulakNAMowadLSaloveyP (2005) Motivating cancer prevention and early detection behaviors using psychologically tailored messages. Journal of Health Communication10: 137–155.
32.
LearyMRJonesJL (1993) The social psychology of tanning and sunscreen use: self-presentational motives as a predictor of health risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology23: 1390–1406.
33.
LibermanAChaikenS (1992) Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin18: 669–679.
34.
McMathBFPrentice DunnS (2005) Protection motivation theory and skin cancer risk: the role of individual differences in responses to persuasive appeals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology35: 621–643.
35.
MannTShermanDUpdegraffJ (2004) Dispositional motivations and message framing: a test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychology23: 330–334.
36.
NielsenJShapiroS (2009) Coping with fear through suppression and avoidance of threatening information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied15: 258–274.
37.
O’ConnorRMColderCR (2005) Predicting alcohol patterns in first-year college students through motivational systems and reasons for drinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors19: 10–20.
38.
PardoYAguilarRMolinuevoBTorrubiaR (2007) Alcohol use as a behavioural sign of disinhibition: evidence from J.A. Gray’s model of personality. Addictive Behaviors32: 2398–2403.
39.
RimerBKKreuterMW (2006). Advancing tailored health communication: a persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication56: S184–S201.
40.
RuiterRAAbrahamCKokG (2001) Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health16: 613–630.
41.
RuiterRAKesselsLTJansmaBMBrugJ (2006) Increased attention for computer-tailored health communications: an event-related potential study. Health Psychology25: 300–306.
42.
RuiterRAVerplankenBDe CremerDKokG (2004). Danger and fear control in response to fear appeals: the role of need for cognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology26: 13–24.
43.
SchneiderTRSaloveyPApanovitchAMPizarroJMcCarthyD. (2001) The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology20: 256–266.
44.
ShenLDillardJP (2007) The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research34: 433–467.
45.
ShermanDKMannTUpdegraffJA (2006) Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion30: 165–169.
46.
SimonsJSArensAM (2007) Moderating effects of sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward on associations between marijuana effect expectancies and use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors21: 409–414.
47.
Terblanche-SmitMTerblancheNS (2010) Race and attitude formation in HIV/Aids fear advertising. Journal of Business Research63: 121–125.
48.
Van ’t RietJRuiterRAWerrijMQCandelMJDe VriesH (2010) Distinct pathways to persuasion: the role of affect in message-framing effects. European Journal of Social Psychology40: 1261–1276.
49.
Van ’t RietJRuiterRAWerrijMQDe VriesH (2010) Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: the case of skin cancer detection. Psychology and Health25: 339–349.
50.
Van DijckDKnibbeRA (2005) De prevalentie van probleemdrinken in Nederland [The prevalence of problematic drinking in the Netherlands]. Maastricht: Maastricht University.
51.
WechslerHDavenportADowdallGMoeykensBCastilloS (1994) Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college: a national survey of students at 140 campuses. Journal of the American Medical Association272: 1672–1677.
52.
WitteKAllenM (2000) A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior27: 591–615.
53.
WitteKMorrisonK (2000) Examining the influence of trait anxiety/repression-sensitization on individuals’ reactions to fear appeals. Western Journal of Communication64: 1–27.
54.
ZissersonRNPalfaiTP (2007) Behavioral Activation System (BAS) sensitivity and reactivity to alcohol cues among hazardous drinkers. Addictive Behaviors32: 2178–2186.
