This scoping review mapped interventions targeting disease-related loneliness among people living with chronic diseases and synthesized their underlying mechanisms of change. A systematic search was conducted across CINAHL, MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, PsycInfo, AMED, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Source, and Embase to identify original studies reporting findings from interventions addressing loneliness among adults with chronic disease. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify shared mechanisms of change. Seven studies representing six unique interventions were included. Three overarching mechanisms of change were identified: learning-oriented support, trusted relationships, and empathic communication. These mechanisms were observed across interventions and appear to influence participant engagement with interventions for disease-related loneliness. Although the evidence base remains limited, these findings highlight key mechanisms that may inform the development and evaluation of supportive interventions for disease-related loneliness.
AlqahtaniJSArowosegbeAAldhahirAM, et al. (2024) Prevalence and burden of loneliness in COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiratory Medicine233: 107768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107768
2.
AlsubheenSEllertonCBenoitA, et al. (2024) Pulmonary rehabilitation and loneliness in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine8: 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2024.2395533
3.
BlakoeMOlesenCSChristensenAV, et al. (2024) The rise and fall of a social support intervention feasibility trial targeting loneliness in patients with cardiac disease - lessons learned and future perspectives. BMC Nursing23(1): 423. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02113-6
4.
BlakøMChristensenAVHøjskovIE, et al. (2023) Protocol for a feasibility randomized trial of a social support intervention plus usual care versus usual care, targeting patients treated for cardiac disease who experience loneliness. Pilot and Feasibility Studies9(1): 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01255-9
5.
BrightonLJChilcotJMaddocksM (2022) Social dimensions of chronic respiratory disease: stigma, isolation, and loneliness. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care16(4): 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/spc.0000000000000616
6.
FanWMaKKYangCX, et al. (2023) The mediating effect of stigma between self-perceived burden and loneliness in stroke patients. Frontiers in Psychiatry14: 1219805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1219805
7.
GraneheimUHLundmanB (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today24(2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
8.
GrayK (2019) A Conceptual Review of Loneliness Across the Adult Life Course (16+ Years). University London.
HawkleyLCCacioppoJT (2010) Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine40(2): 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8
11.
HawkleyLCHughesMEWaiteLJ, et al. (2008) From social structural factors to perceptions of relationship quality and loneliness: The Chicago health, aging, and social relations study. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences63(6): S375–S384. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.6.s375
12.
Holt-LunstadJSmithTB (2016) Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for CVD: Implications for evidence-based patient care and scientific inquiry. Heart102(13): 987–989. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309242
13.
IllariPMWilliamsonJ (2012) What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science2(1): 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-011-0038-2
14.
KahlonMKAksanNAubreyR, et al. (2021) Effect of layperson-delivered, empathy-focused program of telephone calls on loneliness, depression, and anxiety among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry78(6): 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0113
15.
KotwalAAFullerSMMyersJJ, et al. (2021) A peer intervention reduces loneliness and improves social well-being in low-income older adults: A mixed-methods study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society69(12): 3365–3376. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17450
16.
Local Government Association (2016) Combating Loneliness–A Guide for Local Authorities. Local Government Association.
17.
MansfieldLVictorCMeadsC, et al. (2021) A conceptual review of loneliness in adults: Qualitative evidence synthesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(21): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111522
18.
MartinGPJenkinsDABullL, et al. (2020) Toward a framework for the design, implementation, and reporting of methodology scoping reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology127: 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.014
19.
MooreGFAudreySBarkerM, et al. (2015) Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical research council guidance. BMJ350: h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258
20.
NtoumanisNNgJYYPrestwichA, et al. (2021) A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: Effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychology Review15(2): 214–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529
21.
Olano-LizarragaMWallströmSMartín-MartínJ, et al. (2023) Interventions on the social dimension of people with chronic heart failure: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing22(2): 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvac051
22.
PerlmanDPeplauLA (1981) Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In:GilmourRDuckS (eds) Personal Relationships in Psychological Disorders. Academic Press, pp.31–56.
PetitteTMallowJBarnesE, et al. (2015) A systematic review of loneliness and common chronic physical conditions in adults. Open Psychology Journal8: 113–132. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101508010113
25.
PinquartMSorensenS (2001) Influences on loneliness in older adults: A meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology23(4): 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2304_2
RyanRMDeciEL (eds) (2017) Self-Determination Theory : Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness, 1st edn. Guilford Press, https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
28.
ShvedkoAVThompsonJLGreigCA, et al. (2020) Physical Activity Intervention for loneliness (PAIL) in community-dwelling older adults: A randomised feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies6: 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00587-0
29.
SkivingtonKMatthewsLSimpsonSA, et al. (2021) A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of medical research council guidance. BMJ374: n2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061
30.
TheekeLAMallowJABarnesER, et al. (2015) The feasibility and acceptability of LISTEN for loneliness. Open Journal of Nursing5(5): 416–425. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2015.55045
31.
TheekeLAMallowJAMooreJ, et al. (2016) Effectiveness of LISTEN on loneliness, neuroimmunological stress response, psychosocial functioning, quality of life, and physical health measures of chronic illness. International Journal of Nursing Science3(3): 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.08.004
32.
The Joanna Briggs Institute (2015) Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute.
33.
ThompsonDMBoothLMooreD, et al. (2022) Peer support for people with chronic conditions: A systematic review of reviews. BMC Health Services Research22(1): 427. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07816-7
34.
TriccoACLillieEZarinW, et al. (2016) A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology16: 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
35.
TriccoACLillieEZarinW, et al. (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine169(7): 467–473.
36.
ZhangZMLiuHJLiG, et al. (2024) The effect of comprehensive psychological interventions on the mental health of the community elderly. Frontiers in Psychiatry15: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1431116
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
