This study was intended to compare processing instruction (VanPatten, 1993, 1996, 2000), an input-based focus on form technique, to dictogloss tasks, an output-oriented focus-on-form type of instruction to assess their effects in helping beginning-EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners acquire the simple English passive voice. Two intact classes of Grade 7 beginning EFL learners (n = 110) in China were randomly assigned to each type of instruction: Group A (n = 55) to processing instruction (PI), and Group B (n = 55) to dictogloss tasks (DG). A pretest and posttest (immediate and delayed) design was used, where participants' ability to comprehend and produce the target feature was assessed. Results showed that the PI group performed significantly better than the DG group in comprehension, and as well as the DG group in production on the immediate posttest. One month later, the two groups' performances were similar in terms of both comprehension and production on the delayed posttest. Both groups improved significantly from the pretest to the two posttests in comprehension and production. One reasonable pedagogical implication is that both PI and DG are effective pedagogical tools to help beginning-EFL learners to acquire target grammatical forms.
Benati, A. (2005). The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research, 9, 67—93.
2.
Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspectives: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. Modern Language Journal, 79, 179—193.
3.
DeKeyser, R., & Sokalski, K. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613—642.
4.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 87—106.
6.
Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge?: A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223—236.
7.
Farley, A.P. (2001). Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania, 84, 289—299.
8.
Farley, A.P. (2004). The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 143—168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
García Mayo, M.P. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 12, 156—175.
10.
Jacob, G. (2003). Combing dictogloss and cooperative learning to promote language learning. The ReadingMatrix, 3, 1—15.
11.
Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness , 3, 73—93.
12.
LaPierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
13.
Lee, J. (2004). On the generalizability, limits, and potential future directions of processing instruction research. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 293—309). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen . New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
National English achievement test for primary and secondary schools. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 August 2007, from http://www.neat.net.cn
16.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417—528.
17.
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language. A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237—326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
18.
Swain, M. (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning . In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in the study of language: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125—144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty, and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64—81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 371—391.
21.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (Eds.), Research pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 99—118). Harlow: London.
22.
Thornbury, S. (1997). Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote `noticing'. ELT Journal, 51, 326—335.
23.
Toshiyo, N. (1996). Dictogloss: Is it an effective language learning task? Working Papers in EducationalLinguistics, 12, 59—74.
24.
VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom . Foreign Language Annals, 26, 435—450.
25.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
26.
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755—803.
27.
VanPatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225—243.
29.
VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495—510.
30.
VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee , J. Milleham, and R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169—185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford University Press.
32.
Williams, J. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1—48.
33.
Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325—340.
34.
Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998). What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 139—155). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187—205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
Zhou, Y.P. (1991). The effect of explicit instruction on the acquisition of English grammatical structures by Chinese learners. In C. James and P. Garret , (Eds.), Language awareness in the classroom (pp. 254—277). London: Longman.
