This article presents the findings of an intervention study designed to examine the effects of metacognitive strategy instruction (MCSI) on learners' performance and on strategy use. Two classes in the secondary English oral classroom in Hong Kong participated in the study; one class received eight sessions of MCSI and the other served as a comparison group. In weeks 1, 10 and 20, data were collected from the learners' performance in group-work discussions, from the self-report questionnaires, from the observations of learners' strategy use, and from the stimulated recall interviews. The findings indicated that the treatment class generally outperformed the comparison class in the group discussion task. In addition, there was corroborating evidence from the multi-method approach to support the view that the learners tended to deploy `problem identification' as a global planning strategy to cope with an upcoming prioritization group discussion task. The findings are discussed with respect to awareness-raising value of the MCSI, the interaction effect between strategy instruction and research method, explicit and implicit learning, and a match of task type and strategy choice. Finally, the distinct advantages of using a multi-method approach to gauging the effects of MCSI are appraised.
Anderson, N.J. (2005). L2 learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757-771). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Breen, M.P. (Ed.) (2001). Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research. Harlow: Longman.
3.
Brown, T.S. and Perry, F.L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 655-670.
4.
Chamot, A.U. (2001). The role of learning strategies in second language acquisition. In M.P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 25-43). Harlow: Longman .
5.
Chamot, A.U. and Rubin, J. (1994). Comments on Janie Rees-Miller's `A critical appraisal of learner instruction: theoretical bases and teaching implications'. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 771-781.
6.
Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language . Harlow: Longman.
7.
Cotterall, S. (2007). Promoting strategic awareness and control. Plenary address delivered at the 42nd RELC (Regional Language Centre) International Seminar, Singapore.
8.
Dansereau, D.F. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J.W. Segal, S.F. Chipman and R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills, vol. 1: Relating instruction to research (pp. 67-83). Hillsdale, MJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C.J. Doughty and M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
Dörnyei, Z. and Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning . In C.J. Doughty and M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Oxford: Blackwell .
11.
Ellis, R. (Ed.). (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
12.
Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist , 34(10), 906-911.
13.
Foster, P. and Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research , 3(3), 215-247.
14.
Gass, S.M. and Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
15.
Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Hassan, X., Macaro, E., Mason, D., Nye, G., Smith, P. and Vanderplank, R. (2005). Strategy instruction in language learning: a systematic review of available research. In Research evidence in education library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Available online at http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=297andlanguage=en-US/ (February 2009).
17.
Johnson, K. (1994). Teaching declarative and procedural knowledge . In M. Bygate, A. Tonkyn and E. Williams (Eds.), Grammar and the language teacher (pp. 121-131). Hemel Hempstead : Prentice Hall International.
18.
Lam, W. (2004). Teaching strategy use for oral communication tasks to ESL learners. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Education, University of Leeds, UK.
19.
Lam, W. (2006). Gauging the effects of ESL oral communication strategy teaching: A multi-method approach. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2), 142-157. Available online at http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v3n22006/lam.htm (February 2009).
20.
Lam, W. and Wong, J. (2000). The effects of strategy instruction on developing discussion skills in an ESL classroom. ELT Journal, 54(3), 245-255.
21.
Little, D. (1996). Strategic competence considered in relation to strategic control of the language learning process. In H. Holec, D. Little and R. Richterich (Eds.), Strategies in language learning and use: Studies towards a common European framework of reference for language learning and teaching (pp. 11-34). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
22.
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337.
23.
Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising instruction on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal , 89(1), 76-91.
24.
Nunan, D. (1997). Strategy instruction in the language classroom: An empirical investigation. RELC (Regional Language Centre) Journal, 28(2), 56-82.
25.
O'Malley, J.M. and Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
O'Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. and Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 285-296.
27.
Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S. and Kim, H-J. (2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42(1), 1-47.
28.
QSR (Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty Ltd) (1997). Non-numerical unstructured data indexing searching and theorizing. London: Sage.
29.
Rees-Miller, J. (1993). A critical appraisal of learner instruction: theoretical bases and teaching implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 679-689.
30.
Rossiter, M.J. (2003). The effects of affective strategy instruction in the ESL classroom. TESL-EJ, 7(2). Available online at http://tesl-ej.org/ej26/a2.html (February 2009).
31.
Rubin, J. (2005). The expert language learner: A review of good language learner studies and learner strategies. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 37-64.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning . Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
33.
Wenden, A. (1995). Learner-instruction in context: a knowledge-based approach. System, 23(2), 183-194.
34.
Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50(2), 203-243.
35.
Wigglesworth, G. (2005). Current approaches to researching second language learner processes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 98-111.
