This study investigated the negotiations and challenges experienced by five Chinese ESL (English as a second language) students of Commerce through their engagement in an academic presentation in a regular content course at a Canadian university. Multiple sources of data were collected, including interviews, class observations, group discussions, emails, field notes, assignment drafts, and course materials. Data analysis showed that, in their preparatory activities outside the classroom, students employed peer—peer dialogues (group discussions and email exchanges) to clarify the task requirements, generate ideas, seek peer comments, and coach rehearsals. However, the academic presentation — especially open discussion part — was a great challenge to them, related to their underdeveloped English conversation ability, their unfamiliarity with participatory communication modes in the Canadian classroom, and their limited experience with group work. To compensate for their limited sense of conversational abilities, they chose to present a thorough case analysis rather than engage the class in discussion through their presentation as expected by the instructor. The students eventually understood the norms of academic presentation in this content course through their observation of the instructor’s reaction to their presentation in class and subsequent presentations of their classmates, and they realized that they should approach assignments according to the requirements. Implications drawn from these findings are discussed.
Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T.N., & Ackerman, J. ( 1988). Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric PhD program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-45.
2.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. ( 2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Coughlan, P. & Duff, P. ( 1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of an SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173-93). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Creswell, J.W. ( 2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Cumming, A. (Ed.) (2006). Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6.
Donato, R. ( 1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7.
Duff, P. ( 2001). Language, literacy, content and (pop) culture: Challenges for ESL students in mainstream courses. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 103-32.
8.
Duff, P. ( 2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream . Applied Linguistics, 23, 289-322.
9.
Duff, P. ( 2007). Case study research in applied linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Ferris, D. ( 1998). Students’ views of academic aural/oral skills: A comparative needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 289-318.
11.
Ferris, D. & Tagg, T. ( 1996). Academic oral communication needs of EAP learners: What subject-matter instructors actually require. TESOL Quarterly , 30, 31-58.
12.
Flowerdew, L. ( 1998). A cultural perspective on group work. ELT Journal, 52, 323-29.
13.
Gillette, B. ( 1994). The role of learner goals in L2 success. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 195-213). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14.
Goetz, C. & LeCompte, M. ( 1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research . Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15.
Heath, S.B. ( 1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kobayashi, M. ( 2003). The role of peer support in ESL students’ accomplishment of oral academic tasks. The Canadian Modern Language Review , 59, 337-68.
18.
Kobayashi, M. ( 2004). A sociocultural study of second language tasks: Activity, agency, and language socialization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Canada.
19.
Lantolf, J.P., & Pavlenko, A. ( 2001). Second language activity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-58). Harlow: Pearson Education.
20.
Lantolf, J.P. & Thorne, S. ( 2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P., & Brabston, M. ( 2002). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. First Canadian Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. ( 1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Leki, I. ( 2007). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Leont’ev, A.N. ( 1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
26.
Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. ( 1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Merriam, S. ( 1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
28.
Miles, M. & Huberman, A. ( 1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Miller, J.E., Trimbur, J., & Wilkes, J.M. ( 1994). Group dynamics: Understanding group success and failure in collaborative learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 59, 33-44.
30.
Morita, N. ( 2000). Discourse socialization through oral classroom activities in a TESL graduate program. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 279-310.
31.
Morita, N. ( 2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 573-603.
32.
Morita, N. & Kobayashi, M. ( 2008). Academic discourse socialization in a second language . In P.A. Duff & N.H. Hornberger (eds.), Language Socialization (pp. 243-55), Encyclopaedia of language and education, Volume 8. 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Springer .
33.
Norton, B. & Toohey, K. ( 2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 307-22.
34.
Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. ( 2008). Language socialization: An historical overview. In P.A. Duff & N.H. Hornberger (eds.), Language Socialization (pp. 3-15), Encyclopaedia of language and education, Volume 8. 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Springer.
35.
Ostler, S.E. ( 1980). A survey of academic needs for advanced ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 489-502.
36.
Parks, S. ( 2000). Same task, different activities: Issues of investment, identity, and use of strategy. TESL Canada Journal, 17, 64-88.
37.
Parks, S. & Raymond P.M. ( 2004). Strategy use by nonnative English-speaking students in an MBA Program: Not business as usual!The Modern Language Journal, 88, 374-89.
38.
Schieffelin, B. & Ochs, E. ( 1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 163-91.
39.
Spack, R. ( 1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14, 3-62.
40.
Storch, N. ( 2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-58.
41.
Swain, M. ( 2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. ( 1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-37.
43.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. ( 2000). Task-based second language learning: The use of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 251-74.
44.
Swales, J. ( 2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
van Lier, L. ( 2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1987). Thinking and speech. In R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum.
48.
Weissberg, B. ( 1993). The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre . English for Specific Purpose, 12, 23-35.
49.
Wenger, E. ( 1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Zappa-Hollman, S. ( 2007). Academic presentations across post-secondary contexts: The discourse socialization of non-native English speakers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 455-85.
