Erratum to Task repetition,synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study

YouJin Kim, Bumyong Choi, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim, and Sujeong Choi (2020) Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. DOI: 10.1177/1362168820912354

In the above referenced article, there is an error in the formatting of Excerpt 3 A, 4, 5 A and 6 B. The correct Excerpts are given below:

(4) Example 1: Learner-learner interaction during original writing

1 A: 어& 그리고& 할머니께서  저… 할머니께서  저… 음&

   e… kuliko… halmeni-kkeyse ce& halmeni-kkeyse ce& um…

    uh… and… grandmother-NM I… grandmother-NM I… um…

   ‘uh…and… grandmother   I… grandmother  I… um…’

2 B: 한테

   hantey

   to

   ‘to’

3 A: 저한테,  저한테, 비싼,   비비싼   비싼      스웨터

   ce-hanthey, ce-hanthey, pissan,    pi pissan   pissan     suweythe

   I-to   I-to  expensive-NOM expensive-NOM expensive-NOM sweater

   주 었어요 줬어요. Right?

   cwu ess-eyo cw-ess-eyo

   give PST-POL give-PST-POL

   ‘(She) gave me an expensive sweater. Right?’ (without an honorific form)

4 B: 네.

   ney

   yes

   ‘Yes’

(5) Example 2: Learner-learner interaction while responding to synchronous WCF

5 A: 비싼 스웨터 할머니께서 어 저, 한테, 음 So it also, it should be also 드렸어요?

   pissan suweythe halmeni-kkyese e ce hanthey um       tuly-ess-eyo?

   expensive-NOM sweater grandmother-NM uh I to um    give-PST-POL

   ‘Expensive sweater, grandmother, uh, to me, um, so it also, it should be also tuly-ess-eyo?’ (suggesting an honorific form)

6 B: 어, 줘 *줘셨어요,   주

   e cwe *cwe-sy-ess-eyo  cwu

   uh give *give-HON-PST-POL give

   ‘uh, gi-give’