In this study, 118 native speakers of Japanese watched 48 separate video clips in which a teacher provided recasts on phonological or lexical errors to students in Portuguese, a language with which the participants were unfamiliar. In the video clips, six recast characteristics were manipulated: length, segmentation (segmented/whole), prosodic emphasis (stressed/non-stressed), intonation (declarative/interrogative), head movements (nodding/shaking), and gestures (beat/deictic/metaphoric). Participants judged whether or not the teacher had corrected errors and stated the reasons for their decisions. Multiple regressions extracted segmentation and gestures as being significant variables for both phonological and lexical errors. Precisely speaking, recasts were more likely to be accurately perceived as correction when they were provided in sentence-length discourse along with deictic gestures. Additionally, head-shaking and beat also contributed to improved accuracy of phonological errors. The analysis of their reasoning indicates that the participants actively compared errors with recasts when judging the presence of a recast. The overall results indicate that contrary to the common belief suggesting that shorter recasts are better than longer ones, when true beginners overhear recasts, they may find it easier to notice the corrections when they are provided in sentence-length discourse; as such recasts facilitate more accurate perceptions.
Al-SurmiM. (2012). Learners’ noticing of recasts of morpho-syntactic errors: Recast types and delayed recognition. System, 40, 226–236.
2.
AlcónE.García MayoM.D.P. (2008). Incidental focus on form and learning outcomes with young foreign language classroom learners. In PhilpJ.OliverR.MackeyA. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child’s play? (pp. 173–192). John Benjamins.
3.
AmmarA.SpadaN. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574.
4.
AsariY. (2012). Types of recasts and learners’ uptake. Dialogue, 10, 1–20.
5.
BaoM.EgiT.HanY. (2011). Classroom study on noticing and recast features: Capturing learner noticing with uptake and stimulated recall. System, 39, 215–228.
6.
BigelowM.DelmasR.HansenK.TaroneE. (2006). Literacy and the processing of oral recasts in SLA. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 665–689.
7.
BrownD. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20, 436–458.
8.
CarpenterH.JeonK.S.MacGregorD.MackeyA. (2006). Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209–236.
9.
CutlerA. (2001). Listening to a second language through the ears of a first. Interpreting, 5, 1–23.
10.
DoughtyC. (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In AlatisJ.E. (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 1993: Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 96–108). Georgetown University Press.
11.
EgiT. (2007a). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511–537.
12.
EgiT. (2007b). Recasts, learners’ interpretation, and L2 development. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 249–267). Oxford University Press.
13.
FaracoM.KidaT. (2008). Gesture and negotiation of meaning in a second language classroom. In McCaffertyS.G.StamG. (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 280–297). Routledge.
14.
FarsaniM.A.BeikmohammadiM. (2016). Iranina EFL learners’ noticing of morpho-syntactic corrective feedback: Recast types and uptake. Iranian EFL Journal, 12, 76–98.
15.
FieldA. (2014). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th edition. Sage.
16.
GassS.LewisK. (2007). Perceptions of interactional feedback: Differences between heritage language learners and non-heritage language learners. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 79–99). Oxford University Press.
17.
GluharevaD.PrietoP. (2017). Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Research, 21, 609–631.
18.
GooJ. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474.
19.
GullbergM.RobertsL.DimrothC. (2012). What word-level knowledge can adult learners acquire after minimal exposure to a new language?IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50, 239–276.
20.
HattoriK.IversonP. (2009). English /r/–/l/ category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 469–479.
21.
IsaacsT.TrofimovichP. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505.
22.
KamiyaN. (2015). The effectiveness of intensive and extensive recasts on L2 acquisition for implicit and explicit knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 29, 59–72.
23.
KamiyaN. (2018). The effect of learner age on the interpretation of the nonverbal behaviors of teachers and other students in identifying questions in the L2 classroom. Language Teaching Research, 22, 47–64.
24.
KamiyaN. (2019). What factors affect learners’ ability to interpret nonverbal behaviors in EFL classrooms?Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 43, 283–307.
25.
KamiyaN.NakataT. (2021). Corrective feedback and the development of second language vocabulary. In NassajiH.KartchavaE. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (pp. 387–406). Cambridge University Press.
26.
KartchavaE. (2019). Noticing oral corrective feedback in the second language classroom: Background and evidence. Lexington Books.
27.
KimJ.-H.HanZ. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap? In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 269–297). Oxford University Press.
28.
KitaS. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 145–167.
29.
KucerS.B. (2005). Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school settings. 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
LoewenS. (2020). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. 2nd edition. Routledge.
31.
LoewenS.PhilpJ. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556.
32.
LoewenS.ReindersH. (2011). Key concepts in second language acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
LysterR. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51–81.
34.
LysterR.SaitoK.SatoM. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40.
35.
MackeyA. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587.
36.
MackeyA. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405–430.
37.
MackeyA.PhilpJ. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings?The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.
38.
MackeyA.SachsR. (2012). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning, 62, 704–740.
39.
MackeyA.GassS.McDonoughK. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471–497.
40.
MackeyA.PhilpJ.EgiT.FujiiA.TatsumiT. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Individual differences in L2 learning (pp. 181–209). John Benjamins.
41.
MackeyA.Al-KhalilM.AtanassovaG., et al. (2007). Teachers’ intentions and learners’ perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 129–152.
42.
McDonoughK.CrowtherD.KielstraP.TrofimovichP. (2015). Exploring the potential relationship between eye gaze and English L2 speakers’ responses to recasts. Second Language Research, 31, 563–575.
43.
McDonoughK.TrofimovichP.DaoP.AbashidzeD. (2020). Eye gaze and L2 speakers’ responses to recasts: A systematic replication study of McDonough, Crowther, Kielstra and Trofimovich (2015). Language Teaching, 53, 81–95.
44.
McNeillD. (2005). Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press.
45.
NabeiT.SwainM. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student’s second language learning. Language Awareness, 11, 43–63.
46.
NakatsukasaK. (2016). Efficacy of recasts and gestures on the acquisition of locative prepositions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 771–799.
47.
NakatsukasaK. (2021). Gesture-enhanced recasts have limited effects: A case of the regular past tense. Language Teaching Research, 25, 587–612.
48.
NakatsukasaK.LoewenS. (2017). Non-verbal feedback. In NassajiH.KartchavaE. (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 158–173). Routledge.
49.
OliverR.GroteE. (2010). The provision and uptake of different types of recasts in child and adult ESL learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 26.21–26.22.
50.
PhilpJ. (2003). Constraints on ‘noticing the gap’: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS–NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99–126.
51.
RobertsM.A. (1995). Awareness and the efficacy of error correction. In SchmidtR.W. (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 163–182). Second Language Teaching Curriculum Center.
52.
SaitoK. (2021). Effects of corrective feedback on second language pronunciation development. In NassajiH.KartchavaE. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (pp. 407–428). Cambridge University Press.
53.
SaxtonM. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139–161.
54.
SchmidtR. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
55.
SheenY. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361–392.
56.
SimeD. (2008). ‘Because of her gesture, it’s very easy to understand’: Learners’ perceptions of teachers’ gestures in the foreign language class. In McCaffertyS.G.StamG. (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 259–279). Routledge.
57.
TakahashiN. (2014). Stressed intonation on recasts: Differential effects in comparison with prompts. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 4, 15–28.
58.
TrofimovichP.AmmarA.GatbontonE. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 171–195). Oxford University Press.
59.
VanPattenB. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.
60.
VanPattenB.WilliamsJ.RottS. (2004). Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition. In VanPattenB.WilliamsJ.RottS.OverstreetM. (Eds.), Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 1–26). Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
WangW.LoewenS. (2016). Nonverbal behavior and corrective feedback in nine ESL university-level classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 20, 459–478.
62.
WeberA.BroersmaM. (2012). Spoken word recognition in second language acquisition. In ChapelleC.A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.
63.
WhiteL.MelhornJ.F.MattysS.L. (2010). Segmentation by lexical subtraction in Hungarian speakers of second-language English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 63, 544–554.
64.
WilliamsJ.N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.
