Textual thinking as evidenced through think-alouds: Designing meanings in interpreting authentic L2 web texts

Abstract

Recent scholarship in multiliteracies-oriented pedagogies has advocated for greater attention to fostering ‘textual thinking’, understood as forms of literacy that consider the complexities of semiotic choices made by authors, and their underlying meanings, rhetorical purposes, and cultural contexts. This kind of engagement with texts calls upon readers to focus on form–meaning connections, and shifts the focus of reading purposes, toward reading as a form of participation in everyday literacy practices, and reading as a way of thinking critically about representation and communication. This article presents findings from an empirical study investigating the reading processes of second language (L2) French learners while interpreting an authentic multimodal web text, guided by tasks informed by multiliteracies. A prompted think-aloud methodology was used to capture learners’ dynamic meaning-making processes. Drawn from a larger group of participants (n = 9), the current article reports on three unique cases, documenting their engagement with different semiotic modes and their evolving interpretations. The participants performed three phases of reading tasks: skimming for predictions about topic and authorship, scanning for specific details, and tracking webs of text signals. Participants saw the question prompts prior to each task phase, and again at the end of the phase, with multiple choice response options. Findings demonstrate participants’ unique sets of interpretations and processes in terms of the way they drew differently upon various domains of background knowledge, genre knowledge, and reading strategies; the way they attended to various linguistic and non-linguistic modes; and the way the tasks guided their reading. The article concludes by suggesting several concrete instructional practices for L2 literacy development, including tasks that are adaptable for a range of languages.

Keywords

digital web texts L2 reading multiliteracies textual thinking think-alouds

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

N. J.

(1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460–472.

Arens

(2008). Genres and the standards: Teaching the 5 C’s through texts. The German Quarterly, 81, 35–48.

Benjamin

Donohue-Bergeler

Fuchs

Lorenz

(2020). ‘Is nicht egal’: Guided multimodal reading of a music video advertisement. Die Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German, 53, 55–64.

Block

(1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463–494.

Bowles

M. A.

(2010). Concurrent Verbal Reports in Second Language Acquisition Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190510000036

Bowles

(2019). Verbal reports in instructed SLA research: Opportunities, challenges, limitations. In Leow

R.P.

(Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 31–43). Routledge.

Byrnes

(2005). Literacy as a framework for advanced language acquisition. ADFL Bulletin, 37, 11–15.

Carioli

Peru

(2016). The think aloud approach: A promising tool for online reading comprehension. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 8, 49–61.

Cerezo

Caras

Leow

R.P.

(2016). Effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish ‘gustar’ structures: An analysis of learning outcomes and processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 265–291.

10.

Cohen

(1987). Using verbal reports in research on language learning. In Færch

Kasper

(Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 82–95). Multilingual Matters.

11.

Cong-Lem

Lee

S.-Y.

(2020). Exposure to L2 online text on lexical and reading growth. Language Learning and Technology, 24, 87–102.

12.

Cope

Kalantzis

(2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In Cope

Kalantzis

(Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1–36). Palgrave Macmillan.

13.

Ericsson

K.A.

Simon

H.A.

(1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.

14.

Ericsson

K.A.

Simon

H.A.

(1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Revised edition. MIT Press.

15.

Gee

J. P.

(2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. (4th ed.). Routledge.

16.

Gee

J.P.

(2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 714–725.

17.

Godfroid

(2020). Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A research synthesis and methodological guide. Routledge.

18.

Hosenfeld

(1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and unsuccessful second language learners. System, 5, 110–123.

19.

Jewitt

(2006). Technology, literacy, learning: A multimodal approach. Routledge.

20.

Kern

(2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford University Press.

21.

Kim

(2019) Elementary English learners’ use of reading strategies with culturally relevant and culturally distant stories. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 18, 73–91.

22.

Kress

(2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.

23.

Kress

(2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to communication. Routledge.

24.

Kucer

(2014). Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school settings. Routledge.

25.

Kumagai

Iwasaki

(2011). What it means to read ‘critically’ in a Japanese language classroom: Students’ perspectives. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 8, 125–152.

26.

Lin

L.-C.

W.-Y.

2015. A think-aloud study of strategy use by EFL college readers reading Chinese and English texts. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 286–308.

27.

Lück

(2008). Web-based foreign language reading: Affective and productive outcomes. CALICO Journal, 25, 305–325.

28.

LVMH (2020). LVMH and its Maisons engaged in fight against coronavirus in France. LVMH. Available at: https://www.lvmh.com/news-documents/news/lvmh-and-its-maisons-engaged-in-fight-against-coronavirus-in-france (accessed April 2022).

29.

Margaud

(2019). La Cosmetic Valley, berceau de l’innovation de la parfumerie-cosmétique. Marques de France. Available at: https://www.marques-de-france.fr/la-cosmetic-valley-berceau-de-l-innovation-de-la-parfumerie-cosmetique (accessed April 2022).

30.

Martin

J.R.

(2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21.

31.

Maxim

H.H.

(2006). Integrating textual thinking into the introductory college-level foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 19–32.

32.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.

33.

Paesani

(2018). Researching literacies and textual thinking in collegiate foreign language programs: Reflections and recommendations. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 129–139.

34.

Paesani

Allen

H.W.

Dupuy

(2016). A multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Pearson.

35.

Patton

M.Q.

(2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.

36.

Prieto Ramos

. (2011). ‘Why do they hit the headlines?’: Critical media literacy in the foreign language class. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 22, 33–49.

37.

Pritchard

(1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273–295.

38.

Ryshina-Pankova

(2013). Understanding ‘Green Germany’ through images and film: A critical literacy approach. Die Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German, 46, 163–184.

39.

Saldaña

(2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd edition. Sage.

40.

Seliger

H.W.

Shohamy

(1989). Second language research methods. Oxford University Press.

41.

Serafini

(2012). Expanding the four resources model: reading visual and multimodal texts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7, 150–164.

42.

Sheorey

Mokhtari

(2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431–449.

43.

Smith

King

J.R.

(2013) An examination of veridicality in verbal protocols of language learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, 709–720.

44.

Smith

Kim

Vorobel

King

J.R.

(2020). Verbal reports in the reading processes of language learners: A methodological review. Review of Education, 8, 37–114.

45.

Swaffar

(2004). A template for advanced learner tasks: Staging genre reading and cultural literacy through the précis. In Byrnes

Maxim

H.H.

(Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs: Issues in language program direction (pp. 19–45). Heinle.

46.

Swaffar

Arens

(2005). Remapping the foreign language curriculum: An approach through multiple literacies. Modern Language Association.

47.

Tungka

N.F.

(2018). Guided literacy instruction: Helping students read multimodal English-medium texts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 345–357.

48.

Turnbull

Sweetnam Evans

(2017). The effects of L1 and L2 group discussions on L2 reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29, 133–154.

49.

Umek

(2020). Reading comprehension of subject-specific texts in a foreign language. Andragoška Spoznanja, 26, 105–124.

50.

Urlaub

(2013). Questioning the text: Advancing literary reading in the second language through web-based strategy training. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 508–521.

51.

Walsh

(2006). The ‘textual shift’: Examining the reading process with print, visual and multimodal texts. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29, 24–37.