What puzzles L2 learners about German grammar? Using practitioner research to explore threshold concepts in language curricula

Abstract

Taking the perspective of a language program director (LPD), this practitioner research (PR) study describes how analysis of learners’ reflections written for an advanced undergraduate German course in the United States helped an LPD see how students had experienced learning grammar in lower-level instruction. The study analyses a semester-long project based on the PR framework of exploratory practice (EP), in which students (n = 30) pursued individual questions (‘puzzles’) about German grammar that would be most meaningful to them in their language learning journey. Initial analysis of the students’ questions revealed a general preference among learners to investigate grammar topics previously covered in the lower-division curriculum. In-depth case studies, focused on two learners’ experiences with EP, show how the project allowed students to investigate their grammar puzzles using resources across the entire curriculum, including dialoguing with teachers and students in other courses. The study looks to threshold concept theory to theorize students’ learning experiences vis-à-vis L2 grammar (specifically inflectional morphology, i.e. case markings) and argues that the flexibility of the EP framework and its core tenets of working towards understanding and involving others supported the LPD in seeing how learners understood and felt about German grammar and grammar instruction across the larger curriculum.

Keywords

curriculum design exploratory practice German grammar language program direction learner reflection practitioner research threshold concepts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allwright

(2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7, 113–141.

Allwright

Hanks

(2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Arnett

Jernigan

(2014). A cognitive grammar account of case for L2 students of German. German as a Foreign Language, 1, 68–93.

Blyth

(forthcoming). Understanding languaculture: From threshold concept to learner transformation. John Benjamins.

Carson

(2017). Second language use as a threshold concept: Reconceptualising language learning journeys. International Journal of Education, 9, 34–43.

Chavez

(2016). Students’ accounts of grammatical forms of German that are difficult, unattainable, and irrelevant for self-expression. Language Awareness, 25, 197–221.

Chavez

(2017). Hard rules and bad memories: College learners’ accounts of what makes learning German grammar difficult. Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German, 50, 1–21.

Crane

Sosulski

M.J.

(2020). Staging transformative learning across collegiate language curricula: Student perceptions of structured reflection for language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 53, 69–95.

Davies

(2006). Threshold concepts. How can we recognize them? In Meyer

Land

(Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 70–84). Routledge.

10.

Dawson

(2017). EAP learners explore their language learning lives through exploratory practice. In Stewart

(Ed.), TESOL Voices: Insider accounts of classroom life: Higher education (pp. 7–13). Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.

11.

Ergünay

(2018). Investigating self-reported reading comprehension via Exploratory Practice. In Dikilitaş

Hanks

(Eds.), Developing language teachers with exploratory practice: Innovations and explorations in language education (pp. 83–101). Palgrave Macmillan.

12.

Golombek

(2024). Reimagining criteria and the review process for practitioner research. Unpublished conference presentation, 12th International Language Teacher Education Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

13.

Hanks

(2019). From research-as-practice to exploratory practice-as-research in language teaching and beyond. Language Teaching, 52, 143–187.

14.

Land

Cousin

Meyer

J.H.F.

Davies

(2006). Implications of threshold concepts for course design and evaluation. In Meyer

Land

(Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 195–206). Routledge.

15.

Liamkina

Ryshina-Pankova

(2012). Grammar dilemma: Teaching grammar as a resource for meaning making. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 270–289.

16.

Lyra

Fish

Braga

(2003). What puzzles teachers in Rio de Janeiro, and what keeps them going? Language Teaching Research, 7, 143–162.

17.

Orsini-Jones

(2008). Troublesome language knowledge: Identifying threshold concepts in grammar learning. In Land

Meyer

J.H.F.

Smith

(Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 213–226). Sense Publishers.

18.

Meyer

J.H.F.

Land

(2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In Rust

(Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving student learning theory and practice: Ten years on (pp. 412–424). OCSLD.

19.

Meyer

J.H.F.

Land

(2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373–388.

20.

Mezirow

(1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

21.

Ritterbusch

LaFond

Agustin

(2006). Learner difficulties with German case: Implications from an action research study. Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German, 39, 30–45.

22.

Rowland

(2011). Lessons about learning: Comparing learner experiences with language research. Language Teaching Research, 15, 254–267.

23.

Slimani-Rolls

Kiely

(2019). Exploratory Practice for continuing professional development: An innovative approach for language teachers. Palgrave Macmillan.

24.

Stoller

F.L.

Grabe

(1997). A six-T’s approach to content-based instruction. In Snow

M.A.

Brinton

(Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 78–94). Longman.

25.

Thompson

Michell

(2020). Vygotsky, threshold concepts and liminality. Using Vygotsky to illuminate the edge of conceptual understanding. In Timmermans

J.A.

Land

(Eds.), Threshold concepts on the edge (pp. 71–88). Koninklijke Brill.

26.

Timmermans

J.A.

Meyer

J.H.F.

(2019). A framework for working with university teachers to create and embed ‘Integrated Threshold Concept Knowledge’ (ITCK) in their practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 24, 354–368.

27.

Tucker

V.M.

Weedman

Bruce

C.S.

Edwards

(2014). Learning portals: Analyzing threshold concept theory for LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 55, 150–165.

28.

Walter

D.R.

(2020). The acquisition of German declension in additive and concept-based approaches to instruction via computer-based cognitive tutors. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 11, 130–162.